1,721,239 research outputs found
Leadership in the EU? The Self-Concept of German Political Elites (SUF edition)
Full edition for scientific use. This dataset results from a web-based survey of German political elites. The survey examined the self-concept of German political elites with regard to a potential or actual leadership role in the European Union (EU). More precisely, the dataset provides information on whether and how respondents believe Germany should assume a leadership role in the EU and to what extent it actually does so in their view. In addition, the data covers related aspects, such as what respondents understand by regional leadership, whether they perceive a demand for German leadership from other EU member states, and in which policy areas they see the greatest need for action in the EU
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Governing finance in Europe : a centralisation of rulemaking?
How do regulatory structures evolve in EU financial governance? Incorporating insights from a variety of disciplines, Governing Finance in Europe provides a comprehensive framework to investigate the dynamics leading to centralisation, decentralisation and fragmentation in EU financial regulation.This research would not have been possible without important support from the following institutions. First and foremost, we acknowledge funding from the Swedish Research Council (Grant No 2016-01596) and the support of the University of Uppsala. Moreover, the Robert Schuman Centre of the European University Institute in Florence provided crucial administrative and infrastructural support, including the managing of funds and language editing, and also intellectual input such as critical and constructive discussions with the ‘EUI Reading Group on Finance.’ Finally, the book profited from valuable collaboration with the Hertie School of Governance Berlin.1. Governing finance in Europe: a centralisation of rule-making?, Adrienne Héritier and Magnus G. Schoeller.
-- PART I: VERTICAL RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE: EUROPEAN LEGISLATION IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
2. MiFID II between European rule-making and national market surveillance: the case of high-frequency trading, Johannes Karremans and Magnus G. Schoeller.
3. The internal and external centralisation of Capital Markets Union regulatory structures: the case of Central Counterparties, Fabio Bulfone and Agnieszka Smoleńska.
4. The choice of instrument for EU legislation: mapping the system of governance under MiFID II and MiFIR, Magnus Strand.
-- PART II: HORIZONTAL INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE: RIVAL FINANCIAL REGULATORY POWERS
5. Sharing global regulatory space: transatlantic coordination of the G20 OTC derivatives reforms, Heikki Marjosola.
-- PART III: HYBRID GOVERNANCE PERSPECTIVE: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE REGULATION
6. The emergence of transnational hybrid governance: how private risks trigger public intervention, Johannes Karremans and Adrienne Héritier.
-- PART IV: TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION PERSPECTIVE
7. The impacts of technological innovation on regulatory structure: Fintech in post-crisis Europe, Agnieszka Smoleńska, Joseph Ganderson and Adrienne Héritier. (8) Governing finance in Europe: discussion and conclusion, Adrienne Héritier
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
