177,339 research outputs found
A composição do estilo do contista Machado de Assis
No full textTese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Comunicação e Expressão, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Literatura, Florianópolis, 2007Esta tese discute a percepção, ainda vigente em parte da crítica literária, de que a obra de Machado de Assis é cindida em duas partes, como se fosse possível a um autor ter dois estilos distintos. Amparada na revisão da fortuna crítica machadiana e com o método da estatística textual mediante a utilização do programa Hyperbase, compara bases de dados formadas pelo conjunto de contos de Machado, cotejando-os com os romances do autor e a base Portext. A análise exploratória dos dados permite descrever a anatomia do material que compõe o conto machadiano, enquanto as funções estatísticas viabilizam a busca de padrões e transformações no léxico e na distribuição do texto. Os resultados da análise qualitativa, ao indicarem que há poucas variações de classe gramatical e de vocabulário no material, contrapõem-se à ideia de ruptura estilística e reforçam a hipótese de que a transformação do estilo de Machado de Assis no conto é gradual e encontra-se fundamentalmente não no material linguístico, mas na composição
Experiências pioneiras de Machado de Assis sobre o jornal
No full textTese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Comunicação e Expressão. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Literatura.A autora se propõe trazer à tona um instante pioneiro de experimentação do corpo móvel e público do jornal através da perspectiva de Machado de Assis na virada do século XIX para o XX. Tal perspectiva se dá, num primeiro momento, quando o autor carioca faz a travessia do livro ao jornal por intermédio da crônica, e, num segundo momento, quando faz a travessia ao revés: do jornal ao livro através de Memórias póstumas de Brás Cubas
Bryconops collettei Chernoff & Machado-Allison, 2005, n.sp.
No full textBryconops collettei n.sp. (Figs. 3b, 8) Holotype. MBUCV-V-30780, 74.0 mm SL; Venezuela: Bolívar: Río Nichare at Wakawajai, tributary of the Río Caura, 6º 19 21 N 64º 57 13 W; A. Machado-Allison, F. Provenzano, A. Marcano, 6 Dec. 2000. Paratypes. All localities in Venezuela: FMNH 109350, 3 (42.8-52.4 mm SL); MBUCV-V-30781, 2 (43.1-52.6 mm SL); collected with the holotype. FMNH 109348, 2 (55.0-58.5 mm SL); Río Caura, beach in front of El Playón, 6º 19 31 N 64º 31 37 W; A. Machado-Allison et al., 3 Dec. 2000. FMNH 109347, 1 (46.0 mm SL); Río Caura, Caño at Katuwadi Chenu down-river from El Playón, 6º 19 44 N-64º 31 40 W; A. MachadoAllison et al., 3 Dec. 2000. ANSP 139597, 6 (45.9-58.0 mm SL); Río Mato, sandy beach, tributary of Río Caura, 7º 02 N 65º 14 W; J.E. Bohlke et al., 1 Feb. 1977. Additional Material (non-types). FMNH 109349, 20 (10.6-16.0 mm SL); Río Tawadu, raudal Dimoshi Soodii, tributary of the Río Caura, 6º 19 38 N-65º 02 52 W; A. Machado-Allison et al., 5 Dec. 2000. ANSP 168006, 18 (33.5-71.0 mm SL); MBUCV-V- 21791. 20 (36.0-76.0 mm SL); Río Miamo, on Guasipati-El Miamo road, 20 km S of El Miamo, Río Yuruari/ Cuyuní basin, 7º 38 N 61º 50 W; S. Schaefer et al., 24 Jan. 1991. ANSP161536, 21 (29.0-66.0 mm SL); Río Iguapo, tributary of Río Orinoco, ca. 1 hr. above its mouth by boat. 03º 09 N 65º 28 W; H. López et al., 13 Mar. 1987. Diagnosis. A species of Bryconops, subgenus Bryconops, that is distinguished from all other congeners except B. magoi by its unique color pattern, in which red coloration occupies the upper half of a diffuse caudal-fin ocellus. It is further distinguished from members of the subgenus Bryconops by the following traits: pored lateral scales 44-48, modally 47 (>57 in B. alburnoides, 6.2) than the waters in the other rivers (pH<5.7). However, this is speculation at present. As a precaution, we have restricted the types to the Río Caura populations.Published as part of Barry Chernoff & Antonio Machado-Allison, 2005, Bryconops magoi and Bryconops collettei (Characiformes: Characidae), two new freshwater fish species from Venezuela, with comments on B. caudomaculatus (Gunther)., pp. 1-23 in Zootaxa 1094 on pages 13-1
Cruz Machado: Etnograficzne spojrzenie na krajobraz w stulecie polskiego osadnictwa
No full textCRUZ MACHADO: AN ETHNOGRAPHICAL TAKE ON THE LANDSCAPE 100 YEARS AFTER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF POLISH SETTLEMENTS
The monograph describes the micro-world of the Polish-background community in the Brazilian municipality of Cruz Machado, which is one of the largest and most important centers of the Polish diaspora i South America. The work came to being as a result of field studies that were carried out by the author in two stages in 2013-2015 and therefore it captures the reality of the place in one hundred years after the initial settlings in the area. The places visited by the author include the main seat of the municipality, Santana, as well as numerous colonies such as Aprorriba, Linha Boa Ventura, Linha Colônia Nova, Linha Divisa, Linha dos Couros, Linha Fartura, Linha Guarapuava, Linha Iguaçu Norte, Linha Lageado Liso, Linha Palmital, Linha Papuan, Linha Pinhão, Linha Potingal, Pinaré, and Rio do Banho. The author made a hundred or so interviews with the inhabitants of Polish origin. The content of these conversations corresponds with the collection of nearly six thousand photographs that document landscape views, buildings, architectonic and decorative details, vegetation, animals, and people. The sources made at the field were supplemented with materials from private and church archives, official statistics, information from Polish and Brazilian academic texts, press, novels, and the content of websites and fast-developing social media at the time.Monografia przybliża mikroświat społeczności polonijnej zamieszkującej brazylijskie municypium Cruz Machado. Miejsce to stanowi jeden z największych i najważniejszych ośrodków diaspory polskiej w Ameryce Południowej. Opracowanie jest wynikiem etnograficznych badań terenowych przeprowadzonych przez autora w dwóch etapach w latach 2013–2015, stąd przedstawia rzeczywistość po 100 latach od rozpoczęcia akcji osadniczej na tym obszarze. Książka pokazuje, jak ludzkie praktyki, w tym przypadku życie potomków polskich osadników, związane są z zamieszkiwaną przestrzenią. Człowiek z jeden strony musi dostosować się do istniejących warunków przyrodniczych, z drugiej zaś stara się przekształcić objęty w posiadanie obszar, aby jak najlepiej zaspokajał jego potrzeby: materialne, społeczne i duchowe. Ideą przyświecającą stworzeniu tego opracowania było ukazanie zarówno statyki, jak i dynamiki krajobrazu – zaprezentowanie, jak w lokalnej topografii przeszłość przenika się z teraźniejszością i przyszłością. Książka ta nie jest skierowana wyłącznie do przedstawicieli środowiska naukowego. Jej adresatami są także wszyscy ci, którym bliskie są sprawy Polonii: działacze społeczni i polityczni, edukatorzy oraz duszpasterze, a także ci, dla których Brazylia jest krajem odległym i nieznanym, a pragnęliby dowiedzieć się czegoś interesującego o tym kraju
Leptomantispa catarinae Machado & Rafael 2007
No full text<i>Leptomantispa catarinae</i> Machado & Rafael, 2007 <p> <i>Leptomantispa catarinae</i> Machado & Rafael, 2007: 37. Figs. 1–2. Type locality: Brazil: Amazonas, Manaus. Holotype male (INPA) studied.</p> <p>This species was recently described with detailed figures (Machado & Rafael 2007), so we opted to not redescribe it. Beyond the type series we analyzed another three specimens, collected very near to the type locality and similar to the type specimens.</p> <p> Material examined: <b>Brazil: Amazonas:</b> Presidente Figueiredo: AM 240: Km 24, x.2008, luz (1 ♀ – MZUSP; 1 ♀ – INPA); Estrada para Balbina: Km 11: Pousada Berro d’água, vii.2008, luz, 02º03’44’’S – 59º58’28’’W (1 ♂ – INPA).</p>Published as part of <i>MACHADO, RENATO JOSÉ PIRES & RAFAEL, JOSÉ ALBERTINO, 2010, Taxonomy of the Brazilian species previously placed in Mantispa Illiger, 1798 (Neuroptera: Mantispidae), with the description of three new species, pp. 1-61 in Zootaxa 2454 (1)</i> on page 44, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2454.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10093813">http://zenodo.org/record/10093813</a>
Tanymastigites lusitanica Machado & Sala, 2013, sp. nov.
No full textTanymastigites lusitanica sp. nov. (Figs 1–10) Tanymastigites sp.—Cancela da Fonseca et al., 2008; Gascón et al., 2012. Etymology. This species is named after the word Lusitânia, used by one of the greatest Portuguese poets, Luís de Camões, in his masterpiece “Os Lusíadas”, referring to Portugal, where this new taxon was discovered. The gender is feminine. Type locality. Puddles (for instance, tire tracks) on unpaved clayish roads on the way to and around Horta do Tio Luís temporary pond, Mértola, Alentejo, Portugal (37 º 45 ’N, 7 º 52 ’W; 159–174 m asl). Type material. All material preserved in 80 º ethanol, although fixed in formaldehyde, except when otherwise stated. All material comes from the district of Beja, Portugal. Holotype: male; HTL (37 º 45 ’N, 7 º 52 ’W); 17 / 12 / 2003; TL 26.1 mm, SL 23.0 mm; M. Machado leg.; MB (Accesion number: 11 -000931). Allotype: female; HTL; 09/ 11 / 2004; TL 22.3 mm, SL 19.4 mm; M. Machado leg.; MB (Accesion number: 11 - 000932). Paratypes: 1) 3 males; HTL; 30 / 10 / 2004; J. Reis & M. Machado leg., M. Machado det.; MB 11 -000933. 2) 3 males fixed in ethanol; HTL; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MB 11 -000934. 3) 3 females; AZ (37 º 45 ’N, 7 º 48 ’W); 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MB 11 -000935. 4) 3 males and 3 females; HTL; 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MNCN 20.04 / 8853. 5) 3 males fixed in ethanol; VF (37 º 47 ’N, 7 º 48 ’W); 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MNCN 20.04 / 8854. 6) 3 males and 3 females; HTL; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; NHMUK 2013.1 - 6. 7) 3 males fixed in ethanol; VF; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; NHMUK 2013.7 - 9. 8) 3 males and 3 females; AZ; 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MNHN-IU- 2009-3031. 9) 3 males fixed in ethanol; HTL; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MNHN- IU- 2009-3032. 10) 3 males and 3 females; AT (37 º 46 ’N, 7 º 53 ’W); 30 / 10 / 2004; J. Reis & M. Machado leg., M. Machado det.; ISR CRUS 001TL 2013. 11) 3 males fixed in ethanol; HTL; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; ISR. CRUS 001TL 2013. 12) 3 males and 3 females; VF; 30 / 10 / 2004; J. Reis & M. Machado leg., M. Machado det.; DBUA 1324.01. 13) 3 males fixed in ethanol; VF; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; DBUA 1324.02. 14) 1 male, prepared for SEM; AZ; 16 / 12 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; DBUA 1325.01. 15) 2 male and 1 female, prepared for SEM; AT; 27 /03/ 2002; J. Sala & M. Machado leg.; DBUA 1326.01. 16) 1 female, prepared for SEM; AZ; 14 / 11 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; DBUA 1325.02. 17) Mature cysts, prepared for SEM; HTL; 17 / 12 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; DBUA 1327.01. 18) 2 males fixed in ethanol, prepared for SEM; AZ; 10 / 10 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; DBUA 1325.03. Additional material examined. 1) 6 females; HTL; 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 2) 13 males and 9 females; HTL; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 3) 4 males fixed in ethanol; HTL; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 4) 4 males and 1 female; AT; 27 /03/ 2002; J. Sala & M. Machado leg.; MM. 5) 5 males; AT; 30 / 10 / 2004; J. Reis & M. Machado leg.; M. Machado det.; MM. 6) 1 male fixed in ethanol; AT; 24 /04/ 2002; J. Sala & M. Machado leg.; MM. 7) 4 males; AZ; 16 / 12 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; MM. 8) 1 female; AZ; 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 9) 3 males; AZ; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 10) 4 males fixed in ethanol; AZ; 10 / 10 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; MM. 11) 1 male fixed in ethanol; AZ; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 12) 2 males; VF; 18 /02/ 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 13) 7 males; VF; 30 / 10 / 2004; J. Reis & M. Machado leg.; M. Machado det.; MM. 14) 2 males fixed in ethanol; VF; 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 15) 2 males fixed in ethanol; VF; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; MM. 16) 4 males and 4 females; HTL; 30 / 10 / 2004; J. Reis & M. Machado leg.; M. Machado det.; LLAM-GB 47. 17) 15 males and 9 females; HTL (puddle # 3); 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 46. 18) 7 males and 3 females; HTL (puddle # 5); 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 33. 19) 7 males and 3 females; HTL; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 48. 20) 7 males fixed in ethanol; HTL; 26 / 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 49. 21) 4 males and 1 female; AT; 27 /03/ 2002; J. Sala & M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 40. 22) 7 males and 9 females; AT; 30 / 10 / 2004; J. Reis & M. Machado leg.; M. Machado det.; LLAM- GB 50. 23) 1 male and 1 female; AZ; 20 /03/ 2002; J. Sala & M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 43. 24) 3 males and 2 females; AZ; 06/ 10 / 2002; J. Sala & M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 41. 25) 4 males; AZ; 14 / 11 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 42. 26) 2 males; AZ; 16 / 12 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 45. 27) 4 males and 2 females fixed in ethanol; AZ; 10 / 10 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 39. 28) 1 male; VF; 18 / 11 / 2003; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 44. 29) 1 female; VF; 18 /02/ 2004; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 51. 30) 3 females; VF; 30 / 10 / 2004; J. Reis & M. Machado leg.; M. Machado det.; LLAM-GB 52. 31) 1 female; VF; 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 53. 32) 7 males fixed in ethanol; VF; 09/ 11 / 2004; M. Machado leg.; LLAM-GB 54. Diagnosis. Male. Antennal appendage with a short, undivided, distally smooth lateral branch; dorsal clypeal process as a non-sclerotized small tubercle, hardly exceeding level of fused basal part of antennal appendages; frontal clypeal process as a well developed dorsoventrally flattened plate; ventral clypeal process as typical of the genus; distal segment of antenna with a short prominent ventrolateral crest at a level very close to the point of maximum curvature; basal part of penis ending into 2 mucronated, divergent “lips”. Female. 10 th and 11 th thoracic somites widened, with the 11 th somite having one pair of dorsolateral swellings. Cyst. Spherical, with moderate high crests delimiting irregular polygonal cells, without superficial hairs. Description. Adult Male. General. Body of living specimens unpigmented, ivory or milky white coloured, sclerotized parts golden brown. Head with nuchal organ widely elliptic, sometimes almost subrectangular, main axis transversal. Antennule more than twice as long as the compound eye plus peduncle, longer than the basal segment of antenna (Figs 2 A, C; 7 B), with 3 long subdistal setae and 6 distal aesthetascs (as in Fig. 10 A). Antennae sclerotized, elliptic (sometimes almost circular) in outline (Figs 1 A, B; 2 A; 7 C), slightly longer than wide, extending up to the posterior limit of 3 rd thoracic somite (Fig. 7 B). Basal segment longer than distal segment of antenna (ratio: 1.1–1.3); proximal 50–60 % of basal segment fused, forming the clypeus. Clypeus with 3 pairs of processes (Fig. 1 A, B): dorsal (dp), frontal (fp) and ventral (vp). Dorsal processes, located at base of frontal processes as small non-sclerotized rounded tubercles pointing to the front, provided dorsally with a cluster of small setae; they laterally border the incompletely fused proximal part of the antennal appendages, hardly projecting beyond it (Figs 1 A; 2 A, C; 7 C, D, G). Frontal processes partly hidden under the antennal appendages (Figs 2 A; 7 A); each as a subquadrangular plate originating from middle of dorsal extension of clypeus and protruding approximately the same length beyond its frontal end; flattened dorsoventrally, triangular in lateral view and arched dorsally to lateral, mucronated distal angle; medial distal angle a roundish right or somewhat obtuse angle, very close to that of its pair; frontal border with a triangular incision, closer to its lateral side; lateral part of frontal border can extend beyond medial one (Figs 1 A; 2 A; 7 A, C, D, G). Ventral processes arising close to the medial part of frontal border of clypeus, each as a dorsoventrally flattened, subtrapezoidal plate, distal margin longer, medial distal angle right to somewhat acute, widened dorsally into a more or less prominent conical or roundish outgrowth; lateral distal angle prolonged into a digitiform outgrowth extending to or surpassing the medial distal end of the basal segment of antenna; a subconical apophysis on its dorsal side, near its frontal oblique border, approximately midway to distal angles; convex proximal surface of apophysis squamous; frontal flat smooth surface of apophysis approximately transverse, oblique in relation to frontal edge of the plate (Figs 1 A, B; 2 A, B; 7 C, D, E, F). Distal segments of antennae outlining a semicircle, each with the maximum point of curvature at 25– 33 % from its proximal end, approximately cylindrical in cross-section diminishing in diameter to the distal end, which is ventrally scooped, spoon-shaped (Figs 1 A, B; 2 A, B, C; 7 C, D, F). Distal segment of antenna with 3 ridges: the most proximal ridge (pr), short and prominent, developing ventrolaterally, at the point of maximum curvature or, more commonly, immediately distal to that point; shaped like a deformed semicircle, flattened (higher) proximally or, less commonly, subtriangular with proximal rounded angle and rounded distal side; concave ventrally and convex dorsally (Figs 1 A, B; 2 A, B, C; 7 A, C, D, F); an intermediate ventral ridge (ir) developing slightly to medial side from the proximal end of distal ventral “spoon” to the base of the most proximal ridge to which it is connected; shaped as an asymmetrical arc of a circle, highest proximally, distal edge somewhat sinuous and flattened (Figs 1 B; 2 B, C; 7 A, B, F); a subdistal ridge (sr) arising ventromedially and developing to dorsomedial side, typically higher distally, subtrapezoidal or subtriangular with roundish free angle and sides or shaped as an asymmetrical arc of a circle, forming a bifurcated extremity with the distal tip of antenna (Figs 1 A, B; 2 A, B; 7 A, C, D). Base of distal segment of antenna with a medial small, unapparent, hyaline lamella (hl), subrectangular, transverse, sometimes prolonged laterally to form a pointed or rounded beak (Figs 1 A; 2 A; 7 C, D). Antennal appendages—also called appendix verticalis in Daday (1910) and Gauthier (1928 b), processus serriformis in Brtek (1972) and Thiéry (1986 b) or antennal serrated laminar outgrowths in Thiéry & Brtek (1984) —up to twice the length of antennae, arising from the middle of the base of clypeus as an incompletely fused pair of sclerotized cylindroid branches, partially hiding the frontal processes (Fig. 2 A, C); approximately at the level of half length of these processes, the incomplete fusion of the two antennal appendages ends, and continue squeezed against each other before getting separated like the teeth of a fork closer to the distal edge of frontal processes (Figs 2 A; 7 A, G); from this separation point, each antennal appendage, sclerotized and cylindroid proximally, become progressively wider, flatter and softer, losing the sclerotized appearance before dividing into a very short lateral branch and a long medial branch at 20–33 % of the extension of its free portion (Fig. 2 A, C, D). Antennal appendages, when in resting position, stay wrapped under themselves, enclosed by the antennae (Fig. 7 A, B); lateral branch digitiform, 14–20 % as long as medial branch; medial branch ribbon-like, dorsoventrally flattened, gradually tapering toward a distal, rounded triangular end. Undivided basal part of the free portion of antennal appendage with a longitudinal ventral row of long sclerotized spines standing perpendicular to the appendage surface, rarely bent to medial side; spines getting shorter and softer distally to the base of lateral branch or even until the middle of its length, still forming a single row, or a wider band of short, soft, rounded conical papillae; distal ventromedial edge of undivided basal part of the free portion of antennal appendage and ventromedial edge of medial branch with a row of short, soft, rounded conical papillae becoming small sclerotized spines toward the distal end; ventral side of medial branch ornamented with short, soft, rounded conical or spine-like papillae, distal end normally with one sclerotized spine; ventrolateral edge of medial branch with more or less sclerotized spines, normally getting shorter toward its distal end; marginal spines of distal part of medial branch (ventromedial, distal and ventrolateral) approximately of same size (Figs 2 A, C, D; 7 H). Labrum very similar to that of Branchipus cortesi Alonso & Jaume; distal lamella widest subdistally, ending in a rounded acute angle (Figs 2 E, F; 8 A). Mandibles as in Fig. 9, similar to those described for the genus (Mura, 1996). First maxillae, each with 22–24 setae and a posterior ventral spine (Fig. 2 G); basal part of setae half length the distal part, or a little less; posterior side of the basal part of setae completely covered with spines arranged in two rows; transitional area between basal and distal part of setae also completely covered by spines (Fig. 2 I); anterior side of distal part of setae ornamented with two rows of fine setulae (Fig. 2 I), incorporating in the distal half more spaced spines (Fig. 2 J); posterior ventral spine small (around 0.1 times the shortest setae), devoid of setulae, divided into two subequal parts, and ending in a fine point; a field of fine setulae appear near the base of the posterior ventral spine (Fig. 2 G, H). Second maxillae ventrally directed, swollen, truncated distally; proximal part widely covered with fine setulae, with a small spine and 2–3 anterior setulose setae; distal part covered with scattered small setulae, and a ventral distal long plumose seta with basal crown of pectinate scales (Fig. 2 K). Thorax fusiform, wider at 6 th or 7 th somite level. Eleventh thoracic somite with lateral lobes at the posterior 20– 25 % of its length. Dorsally, each thoracic somite carries one pair of warty outgrowths with a central sensilla, similarly to other anostracan species (Linder, 1941). Thoracopods are homonomous, though T 4 –T 7 —less commonly T 8 —are the biggest ones (Fig. 3 A). Praepipodite undivided, ear-shaped in the first ten thoracopods, about twice as long as high, with 2 spaced denticles on lateral edge and denticulate distal edge (Fig. 1 C; 3 A, C, F); praepipodite of T 11 as a basally truncated ellipsis, oblique, directed to the distal part of thoracopod, about 1.5 times as long as high, edge almost smooth except for 2 denticles on lateral margin (Fig. 4 A). Epipodite tending to be longer in relation to width (from about 2: 1 to about 3: 1) from anterior to posterior thoracic appendages, digitiform in the first ten thoracopods, margin smooth (Fig. 3 A, C, F); epipodite of T 11 of similar shape but usually narrowing towards distal tip, with a denticle on it (Figs 3 A; 4 A, C); the distal part of its medial edge (much more rarely of lateral edge) may present a few naked or plumose setae (Fig. 4 C): 36.4 % of the examined males (n= 151) have one or both epipodites of T 11 with those setae; this percentage differs from a population to another, ranging from 12.5 % (n= 32) in VF, to 57.1 % (n = 28) in AZ. Exopodite like an asymmetrical truncate orange segment, wider near the base, straighter side lateral, tending to be longer from anterior to posterior thoracic limbs (length of exopodite in relation to length of endopodite, from about 0.8 times at T 1 to about 1.8 times at T 11; length of exopodite in relation to length of the remaining of thoracopod, from about 0.8 times at T 1 to approximately equal at T 11; length of exopodite in relation to length of the whole thoracopod, from about 0.4 times at T 1 to 0.9 times at T 11) (Figs 3 A, C, F; 4 A); provided with a few (5–7) proximal spine-like setae on lateral margin, gradually longer distally; rest of exopodite with marginal plumose setae. Endopodite of T 1 semi-oval (Fig. 3 A, C); endopodite of T 2 elongated semi-oval with a small distomedial subtriangular projection (Figs 3 A; 4 D); endopodite of T 3 –T 4 elongated semi-oval with a pronounced narrow distomedial subtriangular projection (Figs 3 A; 4 E, F; 7 A); endopodite of T 5 –T 10 expanded semi-oval, medial edge straightened with an angulation closer to the 6 th endite, apex provided with a notch (Figs 3 A, F; 4 H); endopodite of T 5 sometimes also with a small narrow distomedial subtriangular projection (Fig. 4 G), intermediate shapes rare but possible; endopodite of T 11 as that of T 5 –T 10, but apex without a notch (Fig. 4 A); endopodite, excluding the subtriangular projection on T 2 –T 4 or T 5, about half length of the whole thoracopod; endopodite of T 1 provided with spine-like setae on medial or distomedial margin and plumose setae on lower margin; endopodites of T 2 –T 4 (also, that of T 5 when it presents a distomedial subtriangular projection) with spine-like setae on medial margin and on distal part of lower margin, plumose setae on proximal part of lower margin and some short, naked spines (3–4) on the subtriangular projection; endopodites of T 5 –T 10 with spine-like setae on distomedial margin and on distal part of lower margin and plumose setae on proximal part of lower margin; endopodite of T 11 with spine-like setae on distomedial margin and plumose setae on lower margin. Endite 1 + 2 elongated with roundish edge bordered by a comb of long filtering setae lacking basal crown of pectinate scales except at T 11, and with the typical anostracan number and location of anterior setae (Linder, 1941). The distal anterior seta, strong, pectinate, with basal crown of pectinate scales. The intermediate anterior seta at T 1–10, very close to the distal one, is very short, bubble-like and naked; at T 11, it is not so close to the distal one, almost half length of it, conical, ending in a stiletto. The most proximal anterior seta at T 1 –T 10, approximately twice as long as the most distal anterior seta, fragile and provided with sparse, short and very fine setulae at both sides; at T 11 it is similar in shape to the intermediate seta, about half length of the most distal anterior seta (Figs 3 D, G; 4 B). Third endite normally 25–33 % as long as endite 1 + 2, with roundish edge bordered by a comb of long filtering setae at T 1 –T 10, with the typical anostracan number and location of anterior setae (Linder, 1941). The more distal anterior seta similar to the more distal anterior seta of endite 1 + 2, about twice its length, and the more proximal one of the same type as the intermediate seta of T 11 endite 1 + 2 (Fig. 3 D, G). T 11 with 3 rd endite globular just a little longer than the 4 th– 6 th endites; filtering comb reduced to 2–4 long setae; anterior setae similar to the corresponding setae at the other thoracopods, the more distal one located near the middle of the endite margin and about 1.5 times as long as the more distal anterior seta of endite 1 + 2; the more proximal one close to endite 1 + 2, a little shorter or as long as the more distal one (Fig. 4 B). Fourth endite conical (rounded conical at T 1; rounded conical to globular at T 11) with 2 spine-like anterior setae and typically 3 (2–3) long plumose posterior setae located distally at the first ten thoracic limbs, and 2–3 located centrally at T 11 (Figs 3 E, H; 4 B). Fifth endite conical or rounded conical, with 2 spine-like anterior setae and typically 2 (1–3) long plumose posterior setae located distally at the first ten thoracic limbs, and normally in the middle of the endite at T 11 (Figs 3 E, H; 4 B). Sixth endite typically conical (sometimes rounded conical) at T 1 –T 10, and rounded conical (sometimes conical or globular) at T 11, with 1 spine-like anterior setae and typically 2 (1–2) long plumose posterior setae located distally (sometimes closer to a central position) at the first 10 thoracic limbs and 1–2 posterior setae located centrally at T 11 (Figs 3 E, H; 4 B). Genital somites. First genital somite usually longer than 11 th thoracic somite and wider than the 2 nd genital somite, both with posterodorsolateral pair of warty outgrowths with a central sensilla (Fig. 5 C). Penes with a pair of symmetrical, ventral basal, dorsoventrally flattened, triangular sclerotized processes typical of the genus (Brendonck, 1995), with lateral margin regularly curved or, when forming an angle, more obtuse than the one described for T. brteki (Thiéry, 1986 b) (Figs 5 A, D; 8 B, C). Basal part of each penis cylindroid, extending posteriorly hardly up to the end of 1 st postgenital somite, about twice as long as the ventral basal triangular process, and with the medial spur typical of the genus at a level just proximal to the distal end of the triangular process; distal end with 2 mucronated “lips”, the lateral “lip” longer than the medial, mucrons divergent (Figs 5 A, D; 8 B). Apical eversible part of penis (Figs 5 E, F; 8 D, E, F) about twice as long as its basal part, extending as far as the end of the 3 th postgenital somite; cylindroid with the distal part wider, lobed, with a transversal proximal constriction (a) at 20–25 % of its length and a conspicuous ridge (carina: b) along most of the non-distal lobed part of the medial side, disrupting the transversal constriction; conspicuous longitudinal medial carina provided with a normally single row of big spines (7–14; n= 48) typically directed to the base of the penis, the more distal the shortest; also medially, one medium or long apical spine (c) in the wider distal part of everted penis; ventral side with one big spine approximately at level of the transversal constriction (d), normally with one (0–2) subdistal spine of variable size (e) and with one long, more distal spine closer to the medial margin (f), proximal in relation to spine c; ventrolateral side typically with one medium or long spine distal to transversal constriction (g) and one or more small spines (usually 2–5) proximal to the wider lobed part of protruded penis, in discrete groups or longitudina
Machado de Assis, retratista
No full textResumo: Neste artigo, busca-se analisar alguns aspectos da ficção de Machado de Assis a partir da noção de pose, que é sugerida pelas discussões em torno da fotografia no século XIX: “salão de poses” era o nome que se dava aos estúdios fotográficos que surgiram logo após a invenção do daguerreotipo, em 1839. Para isso, o artigo parte de um debate de certa crítica machadiana em torno de outro gênero da fotografia e da arte, a paisagem, assim como da conclusão de Silvio Romero segundo a qual Machado seria um “mau retratista”, procurando mostrar os valores em questão nessas análises. Finalmente, o artigo discute a maneira como o autor privilegia em sua literatura a investigação do salão e da “sociabilidade”, expressão tomada de empréstimo da obra de Georg Simmel, assim como do coquetismo e das formas da aparência, a partir da análise de personagens como o Conselheiro Aires e contos como “Teoria do Medalhão”.Palavras-chave: Machado de Assis; pose; retrato; fotografia.Abstract: This paper intends to analyze some aspects of Machado de Assis’ fiction drawing on the notion of pose, which was suggested by the discussions on Photography in the 19th century: “poses hall” was the name given to the photographic studios that emerged right after the invention of the daguerreotype, in 1839. The paper discusses Machado’s critique on landscape, a genre of Photography and Art, as well as Silvio Romero’s conclusion that Machado was a “bad portraitist”, highlighting the value of such analyses. Finally, we try to show how the author privileged the investigation of the hall and the “sociability”, as defined by Georg Simmel, as well as coquetismo [“coquetry”] and other forms of appearance. We also attempt to analyze these aspects from the point of view of characters including Conselheiro Aires and short stories such as “Teoria do Medalhão” [“Theory of the Medallion”].Keywords: Machado de Assis; pose; portrait; photography
Prof. Th. W. Adorno and the author Hans Erich Nossack.
No full textProf. Th. W. Adorno and the author Hans Erich Nossack at a reception of Insel Verlag, Buchmesse Frankfurt 1966LB
Neotrichobius delicatus Machado-Allison 1966
No full textdelicatus (Machado-Allison), 1966: 76, figs 8–11 (Pterellipsis). Type locality: Venezuela, Distrito Federal, Chichiriviche. Type host: Vampyressa thyone Thomas. Distr.: Colombia (Meta (El Parque La Macarena, 1 km n Cabana Duda; Villavicencio, Barrio Emporio, Guatiquia river)), (? see Guerrero, 1997), Bolivia, Brazil, Panamá, Peru, Venezuela, Trinidad. HT M (UCV); PT 6 (? see Machado-Allison, 1966). Refs.: Machado-Allison, 1966: 76; Wenzel, 1970: 9 (cat.); Wenzel, 1976: 95; Guerrero, 1994 b: 182, 1997: 11 (cat.); Graciolli & Aguiar, 2002: 179; Dick et al., 2007: 374; FMNH, 2014.Published as part of Dick, Carl W., Graciolli, Gustavo & Guerrero, Ricardo, 2016, FAMILY STREBLIDAE, pp. 784-802 in Zootaxa 4122 (1) on page 792, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4122.1.67, http://zenodo.org/record/26415
Traducir: tarea bella, necesaria e imposible. Poesías de Antonio Machado
No full textTranslation — a task of beauty, necessity and impossibility. Antonio Machado’s poetryThe paper is a continuation of a former analysis included in Estudios Hispánicos, vol. 12. The author follows the same method, choosing a pair of Polish translations of one poem by Antonio Machado and comparing them in the aspects of their formal fidelity, artistic values and Polish normatives of poetry. This leads her to state questions concerning the good of the target reader and the impossibility of ideal poetic transfer between languages. In order to find the answer, she conducts three simultaneous analyses, that is, one of the original work and respective analyses of the translations.Translation — a task of beauty, necessity and impossibility. Antonio Machado’s poetryThe paper is a continuation of a former analysis included in Estudios Hispánicos, vol. 12. The author follows the same method, choosing a pair of Polish translations of one poem by Antonio Machado and comparing them in the aspects of their formal fidelity, artistic values and Polish normatives of poetry. This leads her to state questions concerning the good of the target reader and the impossibility of ideal poetic transfer between languages. In order to find the answer, she conducts three simultaneous analyses, that is, one of the original work and respective analyses of the translations
- …
