1,721,031 research outputs found

    Mario Denti, Ellenismo e romanizzazione nella X Regio. La scultura délie élites locali dall'età repubblicana ai Giulio-Claudi

    No full text
    Balty Jean-Charles. Mario Denti, Ellenismo e romanizzazione nella X Regio. La scultura délie élites locali dall'età repubblicana ai Giulio-Claudi. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 63, 1994. pp. 629-630

    Des pratiques rituelles perpétuées sur deux siècles d’occupation à Incoronata: La campagne de 2017

    No full text
    [En ligne]International audienceDirection de la fouille : Mario Denti. Assistante : Emmanuelle Smirou (Laboratoire LAHM, UMR 6566 CReAAH, Université Rennes 2). Responsables de secteur : Josipa Mandić, Cesare Vita, Théo Ben Makhad, Florian Fuduche (Laboratoire LAHM, UMR 6566 CReAAH, Université Rennes 2). Responsables du laboratoire : Marine Poissenot (Laboratoire LAHM, UMR 6566 CReAAH, Université Rennes 2). Responsable de la topographie et de la photogrammétrie : Théo Ben Makhad. Laserscanner et relief drone : Valentino Vitale, Università degli Studi della Basilicata. Archéozoologue : Jacopo De Grossi Mazzorin, Università degli Studi di Lecce. La campagne a vu la participation, aux côtés des membres de notre équipe, d’étudiants et doctorants de l’Université Rennes 2 et d’autres universités françaises et italiennes

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore