1,720,964 research outputs found
Dịch vụ Tác giả RePEc: PID do cộng đồng dẫn dắt được thiết lập
No full textĐây là bản dịch của tài liệu 'RePEc Author Service: An established community-driven PID' của các tác giả Pablo de Castro, Ulrich Herb, Laura Rothfritz và Joachim Schöpfel (scidecode science consulting), do Knowledge Exchange (KE) xuất bản tháng 2/2023. Bản gốc tiếng Anh có tại địa chỉ: https://zenodo.org/record/733051
Dịch vụ Tác giả RePEc: PID do cộng đồng dẫn dắt được thiết lập
No full textĐây là bản dịch của tài liệu 'RePEc Author Service: An established community-driven PID' của các tác giả Pablo de Castro, Ulrich Herb, Laura Rothfritz và Joachim Schöpfel (scidecode science consulting), do Knowledge Exchange (KE) xuất bản tháng 2/2023. Bản gốc tiếng Anh có tại địa chỉ: https://zenodo.org/record/733051
Aus- und Weiterbildung für das Forschungsdatenmanagement in Deutschland
Full text linkFolgendermaßen erschienen (published as): Laura Rothfritz, Vivien Petras, Maxi Kindling, Heike Neuroth: „Aus- und Weiterbildung für das Forschungsdatenmanagement in Deutschland“. In: Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement. Hrsg. von Markus Putnings, Heike Neuroth, Janna Neumann. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021, Seiten 255–276. DOI: 10.1515/9783110657807-015Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über Aus- und Weiterbildungsmöglichkeiten im Bereich des wissenschaftlichen Forschungsdatenmanagements (FDM) in Deutschland. Sowohl internationale als auch nationale Koordinierungsmaßnahmen für das FDM wie die European Open Science Cloud und die Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur erfordern gut qualifiziertes Personal. Jedoch befinden sich sowohl Rollen- als auch Berufsbilder noch in der Entwicklung und es besteht die Herausforderung, Kompetenzbereiche entsprechend zu definieren. Grundlage für ein gutes FDM ist ein hohes Maß an Datenkompetenz (Data Literacy), die zu einem kritischen und lösungsorientierten Umgang befähigt. Hierzu werden beispielsweise vom Stifterverband Projekte für Qualifizierungsmaßnahmen gefördert. Kompetenzbereiche und entsprechende Profile werden auf internationaler Ebene ausgearbeitet - in Deutschland gibt es bislang keine klaren Bezeichnungen und Kompetenzanforderungen. Bestehende Qualifizierungsmaßnahmen lassen sich in grundständige und weiterbildende Studiengänge sowie in Fort- und Weiterbildungen wie Workshops oder Lehrgänge unterteilen. Innerhalb von Studiengängen werden bislang vorwiegend im Bereich der Informationswissenschaft Fähigkeiten vermittelt. Insbesondere für fachspezifische Qualifizierungsmaßnahmen bieten sich Fort- und Weiterbildungen an. An dieser Stelle ist die exakte Definition der Zielgruppe von Qualifizierungsansätzen sowie die daraus abgeleiteten benötigten Kenntnisse weiterhin eine große Herausforderung. Eine gemeinsame Qualifizierungsstrategie fehlt bislang in Deutschland. Zukünftig könnten neben der Ausarbeitung von Rollen- und Kompetenzbereichen sowie Berufsbezeichnungen und Karrierewegen auch gemeinsam abgestimmte Qualifizierungsangebote, beispielsweise durch Qualifizierungsallianzen dazu beitragen, das Forschungsdatenmanagement systematisch und nachhaltig im deutschen Wissenschaftsbetrieb zu verankern
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Chế tạo chiếc máy bay chúng ta bay: lời hứa về mã nhận diện thường trực
No full textĐây là bản dịch của tài liệu 'Building the plane as we fly it: the promise of Persistent Identifiers' của các tác giả Pablo de Castro, Ulrich Herb, Laura Rothfritz và Joachim Schöpfel (scidecode science consulting), do Knowledge Exchange (KE) xuất bản tháng 2/2023. Bản gốc tiếng Anh có tại địa chỉ: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.725828
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
