1,720,996 research outputs found

    Tolerability and efficacy of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: a meta-analysis of observational studies

    No full text
    Aims The role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is controversial. However, they have shown encouraging results in several clinical settings, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease, and various forms of restrictive cardiomyopathy. The current study aims to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of SGLT2i in patients with CA. Methods and results PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase were scanned for eligible articles up to 28th of March 2025. Safety endpoints included the cumulative prevalence of adverse events (AEs) and drug discontinuation (DD) in the SGLT2i-group. Efficacy endpoints were the pooled risk ratio (RR) of all-cause death (ACD) and hospitalization due to worsening heart failure (WHF) between treatment- and control-groups, as well as the difference between mean change of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in both treatment- and control-groups. Thirteen observational studies, encompassing 19 227 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors use in patients with CA resulted to be tolerable, as demonstrated by a low absolute cumulative prevalence of both AEs [8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-17, nine studies, 603 patients] and DD (4%; 95% CI: 1-7, nine studies, 603 patients). Furthermore, its use was associated with a reduction in the risk of ACD (RR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.48-0.72) and NT-proBNP levels (median difference: -525.54; 95% CI: -718.09 to -332.98), despite no significant association with WHF was noted. Conclusion The administration of SGLT2i proved to be well tolerated in patients with CA. Randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to confirm the prognostic improvement associated with their use in this clinical setting

    Impact of Mild Hypothermia As Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta‐Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    No full text
    Background: The prevention of reperfusion injury remains an unmet need in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated mild hypothermia as adjunctive therapy during STEMI, with conflicting results. Aims: To summarize the evidence about the efficacy and safety of mild hypothermia in patients with STEMI, as well as its conclusiveness through a trial sequential analysis (TSA). Methods: PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were screened for eligible studies until August 12, 2024. Efficacy endpoints were all-cause death, infarct size (IS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the occurrence of microvascular obstruction (MVO), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3, and the resolution of ST-segment elevation (i.e., > 50−70% from baseline) after the procedure. Safety endpoints included: the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), infections, any bleeding, major bleeding, acute and subacute stent thrombosis (STh), cardiogenic shock/pulmonary oedema, and ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia. “Door-to-balloon time” was indicated as the procedural endpoint. Two pre-specified subgroup analyses were planned according to the mean ischemic time and the site of hypothermia induction (intra-coronary vs. extra-coronary). A TSA was run to explore whether the effect estimate of each efficacy outcome could be influenced by further studies. Results: Ten RCTs were included. Hypothermia did not provide a benefit for any of the specified efficacy endpoints. Furthermore, it enhanced the risk of infection, the risk of STh in patients with a mean ischemic time of less than 4 h, and the risk of AF in patients undergoing extra-coronary hypothermia. Finally, it was also associated with an increased “door-to-balloon time”, and a trend toward an increased risk of any bleeding. No significant difference was found for the other endpoints. TSA showed conclusive evidence of an absence of benefit of hypothermia on IS, MVO, LVEF, and TIMI three flow. Conclusions: Mild hypothermia is not beneficial and causes relevant delays in clinical management of STEMI patients, raising safety issues mainly related to the occurrence of STh, AF, and infections

    Efficacy and safety of trans-catheter repair devices for mitral regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    Background: Several repair strategies emerged as possible treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the different percutaneous mitral valve repair approaches. Methods: PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were scanned for eligible studies until December 11th, 2023. Clinical efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and post-procedural NYHA functional class <3; the echocardiographic efficacy endpoint was a post-intervention residual MR less than moderate. Safety endpoints and procedural outcome measures were also assessed. Results: Eleven studies were included: 8 [N = 1662 patients, mean follow-up (FUP) 294 days] compared MitraClip® vs Pascal® device, 2 (N = 195 patients) MitraClip® vs Carillon® and 1 study (N = 186 patients) evaluated MitraClip® against Cardioband®. The Pascal®-treated group had lower MR degree compared to the MitraClip®-treated group, without difference in post-intervention mean trans-mitral gradient and in clinical and safety endpoints. A longer procedure time was observed in the Pascal® group, albeit with a lower average number of implanted devices per procedure. The two studies comparing MitraClip® and Carillon® were inconsistent in terms of both efficacy and safety outcomes, while the study evaluating MitraClip® vs Cardioband® showed that the latter might confer a significant clinical benefit, with a similar reduction in MR. Conclusions: Pascal® is as safe and clinically effective as MitraClip® in treating patients with MR, with an apparent greater reduction in the magnitude of residual valve insufficiency over the long term. Data on Cardioband® and Carillon® are not robust enough to draw conclusions from the use of such devices

    Statins as preventive therapy for anthracycline cardiotoxicity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Full text link
    Background: Cardiotoxicity occurs in 5-20% of cancer patients who receive anthracyclines. The aim of this study was to pool all the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the cardio-protective role of statins in patients treated with anthracyclines. Methods: PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were scanned for eligible studies up to May 3rd, 2023. A total of 5 RCTs with 808 patients were included. Efficacy endpoints were the rate of anthracycline-mediated cardiotoxicity, the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure (HF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value after anthracycline treatment, and ∆LVEF calculated as the difference in LVEF before and after anthracycline therapy. Safety endpoints [i.e., the incidence of muscle pain and serious adverse events (SAE)] were also assessed. Results: On pooled analysis, the statin-treated group had a lower incidence of cardiotoxicity compared to the placebo group [risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence Interval (CI) 0.33-0.83, P = 0.01; I2 = 0%], as well as higher mean LVEF [Mean difference (MD) 1.88, 95% CI 0.66-3.1, P < 0.01; I2 = 57.3%)] and a more favorable ∆LVEF during follow-up (MD 2.38, 95% CI -0.03 - +4.79, P = 0.05; I2 = 99%), despite no significant difference in terms of hospitalization for HF and rate of adverse events. Of note, severe heterogeneity affected the analyses for both LVEF and ΔLVEF. Conclusions: The current meta-analysis of all RCTs conducted so far shows an overall beneficial effect of statins on the risk of anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity and LVEF preservation. No difference was observed in the rate of HF hospitalization. More powered RCTs are needed to fully investigate the impact of statins on prognosis in patients receiving anthracyclines therapy

    The effects of SGLT2i on cardiac metabolism in patients with HFpEF: Fact or fiction?

    No full text
    : The rising prevalence of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been closely associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Cardiometabolic disturbances in T2D, such as insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia, contribute to both microvascular and macrovascular complications, thereby intensifying the risk of heart failure. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), initially developed as glucose-lowering agents for T2D, have demonstrated promising cardiovascular benefits in patients with heart failure, including those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), regardless of T2D status. These benefits include reduced heart failure hospitalization rates and improvements in various metabolic parameters. This review aims to critically examine the effects of SGLT2i on cardiac metabolism in HFpEF, evaluating whether the observed benefits can truly be attributed to their impact on myocardial energy regulation or whether they represent other, potentially confounding, mechanisms. We will focus on the key metabolic processes possibly modulated by SGLT2i, including myocardial glucose utilization, fatty acid oxidation, and mitochondrial function, and explore their effects on heart failure pathophysiology. Additionally, we will address the role of SGLT2i in other pathogenetic factors involved in HFpEF, such as sodium and fluid balance, inflammation, and fibrosis, and question the extent to which these mechanisms contribute to the observed clinical benefits. By synthesizing the current evidence, this review will provide an in-depth analysis of the mechanisms through which SGLT2i may influence cardiac metabolism in HFpEF, assessing whether their effects are supported by robust scientific data or remain speculative. We will also discuss the potential for personalized treatment strategies, based on individual patient characteristics, to optimize the therapeutic benefits of SGLT2i in managing both T2D and cardiovascular risk. This review seeks to clarify the true clinical utility of SGLT2i in the management of cardiometabolic diseases and HFpEF, offering insights into their role in improving long-term cardiovascular outcomes

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore