1,720,954 research outputs found
Kajian disinhibisi online di media sosial : studi kasus kreator konten kritik sosial di media sosial Tiktok
Full text linkDisinhibition Online merupakan sebuah fenomena di mana individu ketika di dunia maya melakukan atau mengatakan hal-hal yang tidak akan mereka katakan atau lakukan dalam situasi “kehidupan nyata” karena mereka merasa kurang terkendali dan mampu mengekspresikan diri mereka dengan lebih bebas. Disinhibisi online juga merupakan konsep penting untuk dipahami karena merupakan salah satu faktor kunci yang terkait dengan agresi siber, perundungan siber, ujaran kebencian, dan berbagai bentuk perilaku menyimpang di lingkungan online. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, saya ingin meneliti mengenai bagaimana kreator konten dalam menanggapi isu-isu sosial yang ada di masyarakat dan menyampaikannya di media sosial, serta bagaimana pengaruh efek disinhibisi online yang ada mempengaruhi para Kreator Konten kritik sosial di media sosial dengan lokus media sosial TikTok. Dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pola disinhibisi online pada kreator konten ketika melakukan kritik di media sosial, serta mengetahui Bagaimana disinhibisi online mempengaruhi kreator konten di media sosial TikTok.
Jenis dari penelitian ini adalah penelitian lapangan dengan menjadikan media sosial TikTok sebagai lapangan penelitian dengan metode penelitian kualitatif. penelitian kualitatif ini akan menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus. Sumber data yang akan digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer dan sekunder. Data primer dalam penelitian ini bersumber langsung dari informan penelitian, yaitu Kreator Konten kritik sosial di media sosial TikTok. Sedangkan data sekunder dalam penelitian ini bersumber dari buku, artikel jurnal, serta dokumen-dokumen. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Penentuan informan dilakukan menggunakan teknik Purposive Sampling dengan jumlah informan yaitu tiga orang. Analisis dilakukan dengan mereduksi data, menyajikan data, dan menarik kesimpulan. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan Online disinhibition effect milik Suler serta teori Dramaturgi milik Erving Goffman untuk menempatkan para pengguna media sosial dalam panggung depan, panggung belakang, dan self-presenting.
Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa panggung depan, panggung belakang, dan presentasi diri para Kreator Konten kritik sosial dipengaruhi oleh efek disinhibisi online ketika melakukan kritik di media sosial tiktok. Dan dengan adanya efek disinhibisi online. Kemudian adanya efek disinhibisi online tersebut ternyata membantu para Kreator Konten untuk menjadi lebih berani serta percaya diri terhadap apa yang dilakukannya. Selain itu, para Kreator Konten merasa lebih aman dikarenakan adanya hal-hal yang ditimbulkan dari disinhibisi online tersebut. Serta Kreator Konten kritik sosial memberikan komentar ataupun kritikan lebih banyak ketika berada di media sosial dengan adanya efek disinhibisi online tersebut. Adanya hal tersebut menimbulkan dorongan terhadap Kreator Konten untuk melakukan hal positif ketika berada di media sosial, sehingga yang dirasakan oleh para Kreator Konten tersebut adalah efek disinhibisi online jinak
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Visualisasi kreasi humor Covid-19: Pengawasan penanganan Covid-19 oleh milenial di ranah virtual
No full textHumor merupakan salah satu cara komunikasi politik. Humor divisualisasi dalam bentuk meme dan dimanfaatkan oleh kalangan milenial untuk melakukan fungsi pengawasan terhadap kebijakan pemerintah dalam menangani pandemi covid-19. Tujuan dari riset ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana visualisasi humor di kalangan milenial dan mengapa milenial memilih kreasi humor visual dalam mengawasi penanganan covid-19 oleh pemerintah di ranah virtual. Metode yang dipakai dalam riset ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan etnografi digital. Temuan riset ini adalah jenis meme yang dikreasikan oleh kalangan milenial dalam mengawasi penanganan covid-19 umumnya adalah meme agresif (aggressive meme). Milenial cenderung memilih visualisasi humor berupa meme sebagai sebuah saluran komunikasi politik karena sifat instan dari kreasi meme namun efektif dalam menyampaikan pesan melalui medsos di ranah virtual.
Humour is also used as political communication. Most humour is visualized as memes and used by millenials to do control and watch how government in tackling pandemic covid-19 in Indonesia. This research aims to understand how visualization of humour amongst millenials and why millenials choose visualization of humour to take control in virtual space of how government handling covid-19. Findings of this research is type of memes that often used by millenials related to covid-19 is an aggressive meme. Millenials usually create memes visualization of humour as a channel of political communication because memes is simple and instant but so effective disseminating message through social media in virtual space
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
