1,722,299 research outputs found

    Huangdi nei jing su wen

    No full text
    張志聰集註.綫裝.框19.9x13.8公分, 9行20字, 小字雙行同. 白口, 四周雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心上鐫題名,中鐫卷次, 下鐫葉次及"善成堂"第九卷分上, 下卷.內封背頁牌記鐫"光緒癸卯善成藏板"卷一卷端題名下署"錢塘張志聰隱菴集註, 同學張文啓開之參訂, 長男張兆璜玉師校正".《靈樞經》刻書風格與《素問》不同.With: 黃帝内經素問 : 九卷 / 張志聰集註.鈐"莊兆祥印"朱, 白文各一方.Xian zhuang.Kuang 19.9 x 13.8 gong fen, 9 hang 20 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong. Bai kou, si zhou shuang bian, dan hei yu wei. Ban xin shang juan ti ming, zhong juan juan ci, xia juan ye ci ji "Shan cheng tang"Di jiu juan fen shang, xia juan.Nei feng bei ye pai ji juan "Guangxu gui mao Shan cheng cang ban"Detailed notes in vernacular field only."Ling shu jing" ke shu feng ge yu "Su wen" bu tong.Zhang Zhicong ji zhu.With: Huangdi nei jing su wen : jiu juan / Zhang Zhicong ji zhu.Qian "Zhuang Zhaoxiang yin" zhu, bai wen ge yi fang

    Huangdi nei jing su wen yi bian

    No full text
    V.1-6. 重廣補註黃帝内經素問 -- v.7-10. 黃帝内經靈樞 -- v.10. 黃帝内經素問遺編.V.1-6. Chong guang bu zhu Huangdi nei jing Su wen -- v.7-10. Huangdi nei jing Ling shu -- v.10. Huangdi nei jing Su wen yi bian.啟玄子次註 ; 林億...[et al.]校正 ; 孫兆改誤. 黃帝内經靈樞 : 十二卷. 黃帝内經素問遺編 / 劉温舒原本.綫裝 .框21.1x15.7公分, 10行20字, 小字雙行同. 白口, 左右雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心中鐫"内經"及卷次, 下鐫葉次.書名頁刻"内經, 校對無訛, 京口文成堂摹刻宋本". 書名背頁牌記刻"光緖甲申年[1884]孟秋開雕, 文成".《中國中醫古籍總目》(00006)著錄.鈐"長沙李氏夢瑩藏本", "莊兆祥印", "莊兆祥".Xian zhuang .Kuang 21.1 x 15.7 gong fen, 10 hang 20 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong. Bai kou, zuo you shuang bian, dan hei yu wei. Ban xin zhong juan "Nei jing" ji juan ci, xia juan ye ci.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Qixuanzi ci zhu ; Lin Yi ...[et al.] jiao zheng ; Sun Zhao gai wu. Huangdi nei jing Ling shu : shi er juan. Huangdi nei jing Su wen yi bian / Liu Wenshu yuan ben.Qian "Changsha Li shi Mengying cang ben", "Zhuang Zhaoxiang yin", "zhuang zhao xiang"

    Huangdi nei jing su wen yi pian

    No full text
    啟玄子次注 ; 林億...[et al.]校正 ; 孫兆重改誤. 黃帝内經素問遺篇 / 劉温舒原本.綫裝.框18.4x13.5公分, 9行21字, 小字雙行同. 白口, 左右雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心中鐫"内經"及卷次, 下鐫葉次.內封背頁牌記刻"光緖三年[1877]浙江書局據明武陵顧氏影宋嘉祐本刻"《中國中醫古籍總目》(00006)著錄.鈐"莊兆祥印", "莊兆祥".Xian zhuang.Kuang 18.4 x 13.5 gong fen, 9 hang 21 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong. Bai kou, zuo you shuang bian, dan hei yu wei. Ban xin zhong juan "Neijing" ji juan ci, xia juan ye ci.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Qixuanzi ci zhu ; Lin Yi ...[et al.] jiao zheng ; Sun Zhaozhong gai wu. Huangdi nei jing su wen yi pian / Liu Wenshu yuan ben.Qian "Zhuang Zhaoxiang yin", "Zhuang Zhaoxiang"

    Os dois aspectos do Coração XIN : Interpretações sobre o livro de medicina chinesa HUANG DI NEI JING SU WEN LING SHU.

    Full text link
    TCC (graduação) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, História.O presente trabalho é uma pesquisa sobre o conceito de Coração XĪN 心 em um dos mais antigos e influentes livros de medicina chinesa atualmente, originalmente dividido em HUÁNG DÌ NÈI JĪNG SÙ WÈN 黃帝內經素問 e HUÁNG DÌ NÈI JĪNG LÍNG SHŪ 黃帝內經靈樞. Evidências sugerem que as bases do SÙ WÈN 素問 e do LÍNG SHŪ 靈 樞 são um conjunto de textos escritos durante o período dos Estados Combatentes (475-221 AEC), passando pela dinastia Qin (221-206 AEC) e pela dinastia Han (206 AEC-221 DEC), embora as versões mais antigas que chegaram até nós remontem a dinastia Song (970-1279) . No capítulo 8 do HUÁNG DÌ NÈI JĪNG SÙ WÈN 黃帝內經素問, o Coração XĪN 心 é apresentado como o Mestre e Soberano do corpo humano, aquele que tudo controla e governa, enquanto no capítulo 8 do HUÁNG DÌ NÈI JĪNG LÍNG SHŪ 黃帝內經靈樞, o Coração XĪN 心 é o Vazio do Coração XĪN XŪ 心虛, aquele que não deve a nada se apegar ou rejeitar, morada dos Espíritos SHÉN 神 e nossa ligação primordial com o Céu TIĀN 天. Corroborando a percepção desses dois aspectos, apresento textos clássicos não-médicos como LǍOZI 老子, ZHUĀNGZI 莊子, HUÁINÁNZǏ 淮南子e LǙSHÌ CHŪNQIŪ 呂氏春 秋. Por fim, pretendo mostrar como esse duplo aspecto, que a princípio pode parecer contraditório, está baseado na teoria YĪN YÁNG 陰陽, a realidade última como a união dinâmica dos opostos. Permeando todo o trabalho, pretendo analisar a cosmologia em que a Medicina Chinesa está enraizada, completamente diferente, em muitos aspectos, da cosmologia biomédica moderna e, assim, discuto a própria noção que temos atualmente no Ocidente em relação à saúde e à doença, ao ser humano e à natureza.This paper is a research about the concept of Heart XĪN 心 in one of the most ancient and influential Chinese medicine books that currently exist, originally divided in HUÁNG DÌ NÈI JĪNG SÙ WÈN 黃帝內經素問 and HUÁNG DÌ NÈI JĪNG LÍNG SHŪ 黃帝內經靈樞. Available evidence suggests that at the basis of SÙ WÈN 素問 and LÍNG SHŪ 靈 樞 is a layer of texts written during the end of the Warring States period (475-221), through Qin dynasty and beginning of Western Han dynasty, although the most ancient versions remained until nowadays are from Song dynasty (960-1279). In HUÁNG DÌ NÈI JĪNG SÙ WÈN 黃帝內 經素問 chapter 8, the Heart XĪN 心 is presented as Master and Sovereign of human body, who control and govern all things, while in HUÁNG DÌ NÈI JĪNG LÍNG SHŪ 黃帝內經靈樞 chapter 8, the Heart XĪN 心 is Heart‟s Emptiness XĪN XŪ 心虛, who should not cleave or reject anything, residence of Spirits SHÉN 神 and our primordial connection with Heaven TIĀN 天. In addiction about these two aspects, I present non-medical classical texts as LǍOZI 老子, ZHUĀNGZI 莊子, HUÁINÁNZǏ 淮南子, GUǍNZǏ 管子, XÚNZǏ 荀子, LǙSHÌ CHŪNQIŪ 呂氏春秋 e LǏ JÌ 禮記. Lastly, I pretend show how this double aspect, seems like a contradiction for us westerns, is based on YĪN YÁNG 陰陽 theory, the reality as a dynamic union of opposites. Throughout this work, I pretend to analyze the cosmology that Chinese medicine is rooted on, completely diffent, in several aspects, from modern biomedic cosmology, thereby I also discuss some differences notions between ancient Chinese medicine and we westerns about health and disease, human beign and nature

    Huangdi nei jing ling shu

    No full text
    V.1-8. 補注黃帝内經素問 : 二十四卷 / 啟玄子次注 ; 林億...[et al.]校正 ; 孫兆重改誤 -- v.8. 黃帝内經素問遺篇 / 劉温舒原本 -- v.9-10. 黃帝内經靈樞 : 十二卷.V.1-8. Bu zhu Huangdi nei jing Su wen : er shi si juan / Qixuanzi ci zhu ; Lin Yi ...[et al.] jiao zheng ; Sun Zhaozhong gai wu -- v.8. Huangdi nei jing su wen yi pian / Liu Wenshu yuan ben -- v.9-10. Huangdi nei jing ling shu : shi er juan.綫裝 .框18.5x13.4公分, 9行21字, 小字雙行同. 白口, 左右雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心中鐫題名及卷次, 下鐫葉次.題名據叢書內封頁.內封背頁牌記刻"光緖三年[1877]浙江書局據明武陵顧氏影宋嘉祐本刻"《中國中醫古籍總目》(00006)著錄.鈐"莊兆祥印", "莊兆祥".Xian zhuang .Kuang 18.5 x 13.4 gong fen, 9 hang 21 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong. Bai kou, zuo you shuang bian, dan hei yu wei. Ban xin zhong juan ti ming ji juan ci, xia juan ye ci.Ti ming ju cong shu nei feng ye.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Qian "Zhuang Zhaoxiang yin", "Zhuang Zhaoxiang"

    Huang di nei jing ling shu

    No full text
    V.1-3. 補注黃帝内經素問 -- v.4. 黃帝内經素問遺篇 -- 黃帝内經靈樞 : 十二卷.V.1-3. Bu zhu huang di nei jing su wen -- v.4. Huang di nei jing su wen yi pian -- Huang di nei jing ling shu : shi er juan.啟玄子注 ; 林億 ...[et al.]校正 ; 孫兆改誤.綫裝.框18x12.7公分, 13行40字,小字雙行同. 白口, 四周單邊,對黑魚尾. 版心中鐫題名, 卷次, 下鐫葉次.書名頁題"黃帝内經後附靈樞, 光緒二十二年圖書集成局印".《中國中醫古籍總目》00006著錄光緒二十三年上海圖書集成印書局鉛印子書二十二種本.附: 黃帝内經素問遺篇 ; 黃帝内經靈樞 : 十卷.鈐"莊兆祥印"朱, 白文各一方.Xian zhuang.Kuang 18 x 12.7 gong fen, 13 hang 40 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong. Bai kou, si zhou dan bian, dui hei yu wei. Ban xin zhong juan ti ming, juan ci, xia juan ye ci.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Qixuanzi zhu ; Lin Yi ...[et al.] jiao zheng ; Sun Zhao gai wu.Fu: Huang di nei jing su wen yi pian ; Huang di nei jing ling shu : shi juan.Qian "Zhuang Zhaoxiang yin" zhu, bai wen ge yi fang

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore