1,720,995 research outputs found

    Biometrics

    No full text

    Dynamical Biostatistical Models

    No full text
    International audienc

    Modèles biostatistiques pour l'épidémiologie

    No full text
    International audienc

    Stat Methods Med Res

    No full text
    In biomedical research, various longitudinal markers measuring different quantities are often collected over time. For example, repeated measures of psychometric scores are very informative about the degradation process toward dementia. These trajectories are generally nonlinear with an acceleration of the decline a few years before the diagnosis and a large heterogeneity between psychometric tests depending on the underlying cognitive function to be evaluated and the metrological properties of the test. Comparing the times of acceleration of the decline before diagnosis between cognitive tests is useful to better understand the natural history of the disease. Our objective is to propose a bivariate random changepoint model that allows for the comparison of the mean time of change between two markers. A frequentist approach is proposed that gives validated statistical tests to assess the temporal order of the changepoints. Using a spline transformation function, the model is designed to handle non-Gaussian data, that are common for cognitive scores which frequently exhibit a strong ceiling effect. The procedure is assessed through a simulation study and applied to a French cohort of elderly to identify the order of the decline of several cognitive scores. The whole methodology has been implemented in a R package freely available

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Stat Methods Med Res

    No full text
    Mixed models estimated by maximum likelihood and marginal models estimated by generalized estimating equations are the standard methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. However, their use is highly debated when attrition may be due to death. While some authors consider that mixed model estimates are interpretable only in an immortal cohort, we show that their subject-specific interpretation still holds in the population currently alive, but their population-averaged interpretation is valid only in the immortal cohort. We propose an approximation of the population-averaged mean among the population alive that highlights the difference with the population-averaged mean in the immortal cohort. The interpretation of ML estimates of mixed models and joint models for the marker and the time-to-death as well as unweighted and weighted GEE of marginal models is then illustrated in a simulation study and in an application regarding cognitive decline in the elderly

    Dynamic Prediction of an Event Using Multiple Longitudinal Markers:A Model Averaging Approach

    No full text
    Dynamic event prediction, using joint modeling of survival time and longitudinal variables, is extremely useful in personalized medicine. However, the estimation of joint models including many longitudinal markers is still a computational challenge because of the high number of random effects and parameters to be estimated. In this paper, we propose a model averaging strategy to combine predictions from several joint models for the event, including one longitudinal marker only or pairwise longitudinal markers. The prediction is computed as the weighted mean of the predictions from the one-marker or two-marker models, with the time-dependent weights estimated by minimizing the time-dependent Brier score. This method enables us to combine a large number of predictions issued from joint models to achieve a reliable and accurate individual prediction. Advantages and limits of the proposed methods are highlighted in a simulation study by comparison with the predictions from well-specified and misspecified all-marker joint models, as well as the one-marker and two-marker joint models. Using the PBC2 data set, the method is used to predict the risk of death in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The method is also used to analyze a French cohort study called the 3C data. In our study, seventeen longitudinal markers are considered to predict the risk of death
    corecore