124,977 research outputs found

    Salvia macrantha Hylander

    No full text
    S. macrantha (K. Koch) Hylander (Betonica grandiflora Stephan, B. macrantha K. Koch, S. grandiflora Bentham non Host) 3: Zermatt, an der Visp (Mme Deletra 1944).Published as part of Becherer, 1956, Florae Vallesiacae Supplementum, pp. 1-556 in Denkschriften der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 71 on pages 1-55

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Organizando para una multitud pacífica: ejemplo de un partido de fútbol

    No full text
    Gewalt in großen Menschenmengen ist ein Thema, für das sich die Sozialpsychologie seit Langem interessiert, und das auch für die Sportpsychologie von Belang ist (STOTT, ADANG, LIVINGSTONE & SCHREIBER 2007; STOTT, HUTCHINSON & DRURY 2001; RUSSELL 2004; MUSTONEN, ARMS & RUSSELL 1996). Die Entstehung von Krawallen wurden aus unterschiedlichen theoretischen Perspektiven heraus erklärt (HYLANDER 2008), z.B. im Sinn individueller Differenzen, als Deindividuations-Phänomen (PRENTICE-DUNN & ROGERS 1989), infolge spezifischer Gruppeninteraktionen (DRURY & REICHER 2000) oder in geschichtlicher (GUTTMAN 1986, 1998) und kultureller Perspektive (CRABBE 2003). In dieser Studie wurde ein sozialpsychologisches Modell, das an Gruppeninteraktionen interessiert ist, hinzugezogen, das "Aggravation und Mitigation (AM)-Modell (GUVÅ & HYLANDER 2008; GRANSTRÖM 2008; GRANSTRÖM & ROSANDER 2008), um Befriedungsprozesse im Rahmen eines Sportereignisses zu identifizieren. Hauptergebnis war - im Einklang mit dem AM-Modell - dass dann am ehesten friedliche Ausgänge von Großveranstaltungen zu erwarten sind, wenn 1. diese Veranstaltungen eine Art "Festival-Charakter" haben, 2. Gelegenheiten zur Erfüllung von Grundbedürfnissen und eine wiedererkennbare Ordnung sowie 3. übergeordnete Identifikationsangebote vorhanden sind. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100283Crowd violence has interested researchers in social psychology for many years and is an important issue for sports psychology (STOTT, ADANG, LIVINGSTONE & SCHREIBER, 2007; STOTT, HUTCHINSON & DRURY, 2001; RUSSELL, 2004; MUSTONEN, ARMS & RUSSELL, 1996). Riots in crowds have been explained from different theoretical perspectives (HYLANDER, 2008), such as individual differences, de-individuation (PRENTICE-DUNN & ROGERS, 1989), group interaction (DRURY & REICHER, 2000), history (GUTTMAN, 1986, 1998) and cultural perspectives (CRABBE, 2003). In this study, a social psychology model focusing on group interaction, the Aggravation and Mitigation (AM) model (GUVÅ & HYLANDER, 2008; GRANSTRÖM, 2008; GRANSTRÖM & ROSANDER, 2008), is used as a means of analysis. This article applies the AM model to a sporting event to identify if and how peacemaking processes can be detected. Furthermore, the intention is to discern and illuminate organizational strategies that maybe linked to peacemaking processes. The main results indicate that when arrangements are based on (a) "festival-making," (b) arrangements for basic needs and recognizable order and (c) the creation of a superordinate identity, then the outcome of mass events may turn out peaceful, which is also in line with the AM model. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100283La violencia de las multitudes ha interesado a los investigadores en psicología social durante años y es un tema importante en la psicología del deporte (STOTT, ADANG, LIVINGSTONE & SCHREIBER 2007; STOTT, HUTCHINSON & DRURY 2001; RUSSELL 2004; MUSTONEN, ARMS & RUSSELL 1996). Se han explicado los disturbios en las multitudes desde diferentes perspectivas teóricas (HYLANDER 2008), tales como diferencias individuales, la individuación (PRENTICE-DUNN & ROGERS 1989), la interacción de grupo (DRURY & REICHER 2000), historia (GUTTMAN 1986, 1998) y perspectivas culturales (CRABBE 2003). En este estudio se usa como medio de análisis un modelo de psicología social focalizado en la interacción grupal: el modelo de agravación y mitigación (AM) (GUVÅ & HYLANDER 2008; GRANSTRÖM 2008; GRANSTRÖM & ROSANDER 2008). Este artículo aplica el modelo AM a un evento deportivo para si se pueden detectar los procesos de pacificación. Por consiguiente, se intenta discernir e iluminar estrategias organizacionales que están probablemente ligadas con procesos tales. Los principales resultados indican que cuando los acuerdos están basados en (a) "hacer un festival", (b) acuerdos sobre necesidades básicas y un orden reconocible y (c) la creación de una identidad supra ordenada, el resultado de eventos masivos puede tornarse pacífico, lo cual está en línea con el modelo AM. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs10028

    Organizing for a peaceful crowd: an example of a football match

    No full text
    Crowd violence has interested researchers in social psychology for many years and is an important issue for sports psychology (STOTT, ADANG, LIVINGSTONE & SCHREIBER, 2007; STOTT, HUTCHINSON & DRURY, 2001; RUSSELL, 2004; MUSTONEN, ARMS & RUSSELL, 1996). Riots in crowds have been explained from different theoretical perspectives (HYLANDER, 2008), such as individual differences, de-individuation (PRENTICE-DUNN & ROGERS, 1989), group interaction (DRURY & REICHER, 2000), history (GUTTMAN, 1986, 1998) and cultural perspectives (CRABBE, 2003). In this study, a social psychology model focusing on group interaction, the Aggravation and Mitigation (AM) model (GUVÅ & HYLANDER, 2008; GRANSTRÖM, 2008; GRANSTRÖM & ROSANDER, 2008), is used as a means of analysis. This article applies the AM model to a sporting event to identify if and how peacemaking processes can be detected. Furthermore, the intention is to discern and illuminate organizational strategies that maybe linked to peacemaking processes. The main results indicate that when arrangements are based on (a) "festival-making," (b) arrangements for basic needs and recognizable order and (c) the creation of a superordinate identity, then the outcome of mass events may turn out peaceful, which is also in line with the AM model.La violencia de las multitudes ha interesado a los investigadores en psicología social durante años y es un tema importante en la psicología del deporte (STOTT, ADANG, LIVINGSTONE & SCHREIBER 2007; STOTT, HUTCHINSON & DRURY 2001; RUSSELL 2004; MUSTONEN, ARMS & RUSSELL 1996). Se han explicado los disturbios en las multitudes desde diferentes perspectivas teóricas (HYLANDER 2008), tales como diferencias individuales, la individuación (PRENTICE-DUNN & ROGERS 1989), la interacción de grupo (DRURY & REICHER 2000), historia (GUTTMAN 1986, 1998) y perspectivas culturales (CRABBE 2003). En este estudio se usa como medio de análisis un modelo de psicología social focalizado en la interacción grupal: el modelo de agravación y mitigación (AM) (GUVÅ & HYLANDER 2008; GRANSTRÖM 2008; GRANSTRÖM & ROSANDER 2008). Este artículo aplica el modelo AM a un evento deportivo para si se pueden detectar los procesos de pacificación. Por consiguiente, se intenta discernir e iluminar estrategias organizacionales que están probablemente ligadas con procesos tales. Los principales resultados indican que cuando los acuerdos están basados en (a) "hacer un festival", (b) acuerdos sobre necesidades básicas y un orden reconocible y (c) la creación de una identidad supra ordenada, el resultado de eventos masivos puede tornarse pacífico, lo cual está en línea con el modelo AM.Gewalt in großen Menschenmengen ist ein Thema, für das sich die Sozialpsychologie seit Langem interessiert, und das auch für die Sportpsychologie von Belang ist (STOTT, ADANG, LIVINGSTONE & SCHREIBER 2007; STOTT, HUTCHINSON & DRURY 2001; RUSSELL 2004; MUSTONEN, ARMS & RUSSELL 1996). Die Entstehung von Krawallen wurden aus unterschiedlichen theoretischen Perspektiven heraus erklärt (HYLANDER 2008), z.B. im Sinn individueller Differenzen, als Deindividuations-Phänomen (PRENTICE-DUNN & ROGERS 1989), infolge spezifischer Gruppeninteraktionen (DRURY & REICHER 2000) oder in geschichtlicher (GUTTMAN 1986, 1998) und kultureller Perspektive (CRABBE 2003). In dieser Studie wurde ein sozialpsychologisches Modell, das an Gruppeninteraktionen interessiert ist, hinzugezogen, das "Aggravation und Mitigation (AM)-Modell (GUVÅ & HYLANDER 2008; GRANSTRÖM 2008; GRANSTRÖM & ROSANDER 2008), um Befriedungsprozesse im Rahmen eines Sportereignisses zu identifizieren. Hauptergebnis war - im Einklang mit dem AM-Modell - dass dann am ehesten friedliche Ausgänge von Großveranstaltungen zu erwarten sind, wenn 1. diese Veranstaltungen eine Art "Festival-Charakter" haben, 2. Gelegenheiten zur Erfüllung von Grundbedürfnissen und eine wiedererkennbare Ordnung sowie 3. übergeordnete Identifikationsangebote vorhanden sind

    Organizing for a Peaceful Crowd: An Example of a Football Match

    No full text
    Crowd violence has interested researchers in social psychology for many years and is an important issue for sports psychology (STOTT, ADANG, LIVINGSTONE & SCHREIBER, 2007; STOTT, HUTCHINSON & DRURY, 2001; RUSSELL, 2004; MUSTONEN, ARMS & RUSSELL, 1996). Riots in crowds have been explained from different theoretical perspectives (HYLANDER, 2008), such as individual differences, de-individuation (PRENTICE-DUNN & ROGERS, 1989), group interaction (DRURY & REICHER, 2000), history (GUTTMAN, 1986, 1998) and cultural perspectives (CRABBE, 2003). In this study, a social psychology model focusing on group interaction, the Aggravation and Mitigation (AM) model (GUVÅ & HYLANDER, 2008; GRANSTRÖM, 2008; GRANSTRÖM & ROSANDER, 2008), is used as a means of analysis. This article applies the AM model to a sporting event to identify if and how peacemaking processes can be detected. Furthermore, the intention is to discern and illuminate organizational strategies that maybe linked to peacemaking processes. The main results indicate that when arrangements are based on (a) "festival-making," (b) arrangements for basic needs and recognizable order and (c) the creation of a superordinate identity, then the outcome of mass events may turn out peaceful, which is also in line with the AM model. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs10028

    Organizing for a peaceful crowd : An example of a football match

    No full text
    Crowd violence has interested researchers in social psychology for many years and is an important issue for sports psychology (STOTT, ADANG, LIVINGSTONE and SCHREIBER, 2007; STOTT, HUTCHINSON and DRURY, 2001; RUSSELL, 2004; MUSTONEN, ARMS and RUSSELL, 1996). Riots in crowds have been explained from different theoretical perspectives (HYLANDER, 2008), such as individual differences, de-individuation (PRENTICE-DUNN and ROGERS, 1989), group interaction (DRURY and REICHER, 2000), history (GUTTMAN, 1986, 1998) and cultural perspectives (CRABBE, 2003). In this study, a social psychology model focusing on group interaction, the Aggravation and Mitigation (AM) model (GUVÅ and HYLANDER, 2008; GRANSTRÖM, 2008; GRANSTRÖM and ROSANDER, 2008), is used as a means of analysis. This article applies the AM model to a sporting event to identify if and how peacemaking processes can be detected. Furthermore, the intention is to discern and illuminate organizational strategies that maybe linked to peacemaking processes. The main results indicate that when arrangements are based on (a) "festival-making," (b) arrangements for basic needs and recognizable order and (c) the creation of a superordinate identity, then the outcome of mass events may turn out peaceful, which is also in line with the AM model. © 2010 FQS.</p

    Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology

    No full text
    To unify or not to unify applied psychology: that is the question. In this article we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question—from a comprehensive, positivist, “top-down,” deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 60s, to a postmodern no since then. A rationale and proposal for a limited, “bottom-up,” inductive yes in applied psychology is then presented, employing a case-based paradigm that integrates both positivist and postmodern themes and components. This paradigm is labeled “pragmatic psychology” and, its specific use of case studies, the “Pragmatic Case Study Method” (“PCS Method”). We call for the creation of peer-reviewed journal-databases of pragmatic case studies as a foundational source of unifying applied knowledge in our discipline. As one example, the potential of the PCS Method for unifying different angles of theoretical regard is illustrated in an area of applied psychology, psychotherapy, via the case of Mrs. B. The article then turns to the broader historical and epistemological arguments for the unifying nature of the PCS Method in both applied and basic psychology.Peer reviewe

    Dr. Edwin Wright Collection: Author Unknown

    No full text
    Notes - The author relates several short stories about his neighbours including Alex McDonell, homesteading and life around Meanook and Athabasca (1 page

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore