1,721,437 research outputs found
Hu Feng wen ji.
No full textChapter 第一輯理想主義者時代底囘憶 ---p.2Chapter 第二輯悲痛的告別 ---p.12關於魯迅精神底二三基點 ---p.17從'有一分熱發一分光'生長起來的 ---p.19Chapter 第三輯文學史上的五.四 ---p.34從冬天想起的 ---p.37Chapter 第四輯林語論堂 ---p.42田間底詩 ---p.62吹蘆笛的詩人 ---p.66憶東平 ---p.74Chapter 第五輯'過客'小釋 ---p.88論'北京人' ---p.90靑春底詩 ---p.101Chapter 第六輯文藝界風習一景 ---p.108漫談個人主義 ---p.112略論文學無門 ---p.115答文藝問題上的若幹質疑 ---p.119Chapter 第七輯流氓哲學 ---p.128棘源村斷想 ---p.131Chapter 一關於丑角Chapter 二印象論Chapter 三另一種阿Q精神或者叫'量決定質的哲學'Chapter 四齊家之道舉例Chapter 五一個母親底過年法以及由這引起的風波死人復活的時候 ---p.139半侖村斷想 ---p.146Chapter 一想到幾個小故事Chapter 二懷古Chapter 三人民底三相論'大國之風'種種 ---p.153關於'善意的第三人' ---p.163空洞的話 ---p.166上海是一個海 ---p.168在瘋狂的時代裏面 ---p.174[著作者胡風(張光人)].[zhu zao zhe Hu, Feng(Zhang Guang Ren)]
Hu Feng und die Literaturkritik der kommunistischen Partei Chinas
No full textDie vorliegende Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Kampagne gegen den linksgerichteten Schriftsteller und Herausgeber Hu Feng (1902-1985) Mitte der 1950er Jahre in der VR China. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf Textkritik als Mittel der Diffamierung, wie sie von den Literaturbürokraten der KPCh angewendet wurde, um Hu Feng und andere Literaturschaffende zu verurteilen. Diese Strategie der Textkritik wird anhand ausgewählter Texte Hu Fengs, anhand der Anklageschriften der KPCh, sowie anhand von Kritiken parteikonformer Autoren untersucht.
Durch die Manipulation und Diskreditierung von Texten sollte das harte Vorgehen gegen Hu Feng und gleichgesinnte Intellektuelle gerechtfertigt werden. Dabei ging es der Partei um die Implementierung der Richtlinien für Literatur und Kunst von Mao Zedong, sowie um die Einschüchterung der Intellektuellen, die bei einem Abweichen von diesen kulturpolitischen Vorgaben die Parteilinie in Frage gestellt hätten. Zum besseren Verständnis der Ursachen und Auswirkungen der Hu Feng-Kampagne stellt die Arbeit auch den historisch-politischen Kontext von Hu Fengs Werdegang, sowie sein Schicksal nach Ende der offiziellen Kampagne dar.This master thesis deals with the campaign against the leftist writer and editor Hu Feng (1902-1985) in the nineteen fifties. It identifies and analyses literary critique as a tool used by the literature bureaucrats of the CCP to accuse Hu Feng and other literary figures. This strategy in the form of textual criticism is examined on the basis of selected works by Hu Feng, the indictments of the CCP, and critiques of his works by conformist authors.
The manipulation of Hu Feng’s writings was aimed at legitimizing the purging of him and his followers. It was meant to enforce the implementation of Mao Zedong’s guidelines for literature and art, and to intimidate intellectuals who by not adhering to those guidelines would have questioned the party line. For a better understanding of the reasons for and implications of the campaign, the thesis also introduces information on the historical and political context of Hu Feng’s career, as well as his fate after the official end of the campaign
Traduciendo la subjetividad: la traducción de Hu Feng de una novela proletaria soviética
No full textThe renowned Chinese intellectual Hu Feng (1902-1985) is either referenced as the heir of the May Fourth critical spirit, especially that of Lu Xun (1881-1936), or associated with a famous case of political persecution in the 1940s and 1950s, namely, the “Hu Feng Anti- Revolutionary Clique.” However, the young Hu Feng as a translator during his years in Japan is somewhat neglected. This article situates Hu Feng in the context of world proletarian literature. I look into Hu Feng’s literary activities in Japan and examine his Chinese translation, Yanggui (1930), of a Soviet proletarian-utopian novel titled Mess Mend, or a Yankee in Petrograd (1923) via Japanese translation. I argue that the years in Japan and his translation of the Soviet novel shape Hu Feng as a thinker of international proletarian subjectivity.Al renombrado intelectual chino Hu Feng (1902-1985) se le menciona ya sea como el heredero del espíritu crítico del 4 de mayo, especialmente el de Lu Xun (1881-1936), o como el asociado con un famoso caso de persecución política en los años 1940 y 1950, es decir, la "Camarilla anti-revolucionaria de Hu Feng". Sin embargo, la labor del joven Hu Feng como traductor durante sus años en Japón está algo descuidada. Este artículo sitúa a Hu Feng en el contexto de la literatura proletaria mundial. En él se estudian las actividades literarias de Hu Feng en Japón y se analiza su traducción china, Yanggui (1930), de una novela soviética proletaria-utópica titulada Mess Mend, o un yanqui en Petrogrado (1923) mediada a través de una traducción al japonés. En este artículo argumento que los años en Japón y su traducción de la novela soviética conforman a Hu Feng como un pensador de la subjetividad proletaria internacional
“Hu Feng Incident” and the Formation of New Literary Mechanism
Full text link“胡风事件”包含了丰富的内容，无论是从文学史还是从思想史的角度总能获取巨大的理论和精神资源，这种资源必然会对中国文学的发展具有十分重要的价值。为此，本文将分三章展开论述。第一章：“胡风事件”。回到历史现场，还原出整个事件形成的脉络，交代“胡风事件”“是什么”，即“胡风事件”是胡风及其同仁们因主张的文艺思想与政治要求不符而产生的文艺论争、人事纠纷，直至升级为政治事件而获罪的一系列活动的总称；“胡风事件”形成的原因，在了解了事件“是什么”后再进一步追问“为什么”，从众多原因中得出最本质的原因，即文学与主流意识形态的偏离；在此基础上考察胡风研究的各种观点，分析其研究的成果，在梳理以往研究成果后发掘胡...“Hu Feng incident” includes abundant contents, we can obtain the enormous theoretical and spiritual resources in terms of the literature history and the intellectual history in the incident. This kind of resources will inevitably have very important value to the development of Chinese literature. For this reason, the thesis will be divided into three chapters to expound. Chapter one: “Hu Feng inci...学位：文学硕士院系专业：人文学院中文系_中国现当代文学学号：20020103
Four new earthworms of the genus Amynthas (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) from Mount Emei, Sichuan Province, China
No full textSun, Jing, Jiang, Jibao, Hu, Feng, Qiu, Jiangping (2016): Four new earthworms of the genus Amynthas (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) from Mount Emei, Sichuan Province, China. Journal of Natural History 50: 2499-2513, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1193649, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2016.119364
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
