33,796 research outputs found
Ji Han xiang chen zhuan
No full text[V.1-2]. 前漢相臣傳 : 十二卷 -- [v.3-5]. 後漢相臣傳 : 十六卷 -- [v.6]. 季漢相臣傳 : 六卷.[V.1-2]. Qian Han xiang chen zhuan : shi er juan -- [v.3-5]. Hou Han xiang chen zhuan : shi liu juan -- [v.6]. Ji Han xiang chen zhuan : liu juan.魏顯國纂述 ; 魏一鵬編次.綫裝, 1函.框22x14.3公分, 10行20字, 白口, 單黑魚尾, 四周單邊, 版心上鐫題名, 中鐫卷次, 下鐫葉次及小題.刻書年據《四庫全書存目叢書》鈐有"元鑑齋", "潤州笪重光鑒定印", "毛氏收藏子孫永保"印.Library's copy: 本館只存《歷代相臣傳》中《前漢》, 《後漢》, 《季漢》共六冊.Xian zhuang, 1 han.Kuang 22 x 14.3 gong fen, 10 hang 20 zi, bai kou, dan hei yu wei, si zhou dan bian, ban xin shang juan ti ming, zhong juan juan ci, xia juan ye ci ji xiao ti.Ke shu nian ju "Si ku quan shu cun mu cong shu"Wei Xianguo zuan shu ; Wei Yipeng bian ci.Qian you "Yuan jian zhai", "Runzhou Da Chongguang jian ding yin", "Mao shi shou cang zi sun yong bao" yin.Library's copy: ben guan zhi cun "Li dai xiang chen zhuan" zhong "Qian Han", "Hou Han", "Ji Han" gong liu ce
Das Hou Han ji des Yuan Hong: Zur Historiographie der Späteren Han-Dynastie
No full textIn the period after the fall of the Later Han Dynasty 後漢 (25-220), numerous historians began to revise and abridge the dynasty's official history work, the Dongguan Han ji 東觀漢記, which had been compiled by imperial order. Within about 200 years, a round dozen works emerged in this way, all of which drew on the same sources, but each told the story a little differently. Only two of these have survived to this day, Fan Ye's 范曄 (398-446) Hou Han shu 後漢 書and Yuan Hong's 袁宏 (330-378) Hou Han ji 後漢紀. However, these are far from being on equal footing. While the Hou Han shu has been included in the circle of 24 dynastic histories and has long been the most important source for the Later Han dynasty, the Hou Han ji disappeared almost completely in its shadow and has often been dismissed as a kind of abridged version of the actual historical work.
This study demonstrates, on the basis of comparisons of the portrayal of important events and figures in the two works and in fragments that survived from other Later Han histories, that in many cases an alternative account and interpretation of events was disregarded, and that reading the Hou Han ji can provide valuable insights into the methods of medieval Chinese historians. For even though both authors drew from the same material base, they did not always ask the same questions and selected their material according to different criteria: The results are two quite different accounts of the Later Han Dynasty
On the Hou-kuo (封國) of the Former Han
No full textThe lieh-hou (列侯), which was a kind of feaudal lord under the Han dynasty was enfeoffed to the hsien (縣), and such a hsien was called houkuo. But the number of the households of the hsien disagrees with that of the hsien's households, indicating that the lieh-hou was enfeoffed as lord of part of the hsien. Such was the rule in the Former Han period, but at the end of the period this rule was loosed, and the lieh-hou became to be enfeoffed as lord of the entire hsien as we find in the Biography of K'uang Ch'eng (框衡)who had the whole Lo-an (樂安) hsien as his feof. Unless we take it into consideration that the lieh-hou's feof was not same with the hsien. we cannot grasp the difference of function between the hsiang (相) and the chia-ch'eng (家丞). The hsiang of a lieh-hou was, in fact, ling-ch'ang of an ordinary hsien, the only difference being that he was obliged to send in a certain amount of taxes collected in his hsien to the lieh-hou. It seems that the lieh-hou as a feudal lord had only limited power over his feof, though sometimes he wielded his power unlawfully in extorting the peasants
Neural Correlates of Optimal Multisensory Decision Making under Time-Varying Reliabilities with an Invariant Linear Probabilistic Population Code. Hou et al
No full textEach .mat file stores each cell's raw data (e.g., spike trains and monkey's behavioral events) as well as pre-processed data (e.g., smoothed PSTHs for different conditions). All experimental figures can be reproduced by running the Matlab GUI in the GitHub repository: /Labtools/HH_Tools/GROUP_GUI.fig
Structure of the Han Astronomical Bureau (Hou Hanshu)
No full textOrganization of the late Han (206 bc–ad 220) office of the Prefect Grand Scribe (Taishi ling 太史令). Asterisks indicate titles born by named individuals appearing in primary sources found to date. Source: Hanguan 漢官 (Han Offices) as cited in Hou Hanshu 後漢書 (Zhonghua shuju, 1965), zhi 25, 3572
Structure of the Han Astronomical Bureau (Hou Hanshu)
No full textOrganization of the late Han (206 bc–ad 220) office of the Prefect Grand Scribe (Taishi ling 太史令). Asterisks indicate titles born by named individuals appearing in primary sources found to date. Source: Hanguan 漢官 (Han Offices) as cited in Hou Hanshu 後漢書 (Zhonghua shuju, 1965), zhi 25, 3572
Hou Han Ji(Records of Later Han) and Yuan Hong's Historiography and Thoughts
No full text今本《後漢紀》是一部尚稱完整的斷代史文獻，此書早於范曄的《後漢書》成書問世，從研究後漢史的立場來看，應有重於《後漢書》的史料價值性。可是《後漢紀》歷經一段被輕忽的時期後，雖然現今存本大致上完整，但是內容已有些許脫誤，而且史事記載也與他書有諸多殊異。本文研究從《後漢紀》的內容重新審定這部歷史文獻對於後漢史的史料價值，並且檢視袁宏編撰這部史著在中國史籍編纂學與史學史上所蘊含的意涵，分析其指導撰史的思想意念，以對《後漢紀》與作者袁宏有整體而深度的認識。
根據本論文研究的主題與方向，按史料、文獻的內容分類，由核心向外分別為「各本《後漢紀》」、「其他古籍相關史料」、「《後漢紀》的校勘與研究」、「袁宏相關研究」、「中國傳統史學與思想相關論著」及「其他相關文獻」等等。研究《後漢紀》得與相關的其他古籍文獻相互參校，以核對或補正史事的內容，從而找出《後漢紀》記載的獨特之處。至於與袁宏相關之研究、與中國傳統史學及思想相關的論著，以及其他相關的文獻等等，藉資前人研究成果輔助本論文更精確地探索《後漢紀》的價值與意義。
研究方法上，首先運用文獻學方法探討《後漢紀》的傳行與其史料價值，對《後漢紀》所記載的後漢史事作全面性的分析後，再進一步深入探討其內在意涵，如史籍創作的條件、作者運用的方法，甚至作者的創作思維及思想蘊含等。在探討這部史籍以上的諸多面向，採多種研究方法交互運用，以歷史研究法為核心，研究過程中時時善用分析方法與綜合方法，再佐以歷史比較方法與心理分析方法。
本文以《後漢紀》為研究主體，從中國史部文獻發展史的角度切入，探討一部史籍的傳世與價值。蔣國祚、陳璞、鈕永建等清代學人，以及近人周天游、張烈等皆已致力於此書校考工作，筆者藉助前人的成果，進一步分析《後漢紀》所記載的史事，探討這部後漢斷代史籍的文獻價值。接著，筆者從中國傳統史學發展史的角度，討論到東晉時期如何誕生一部編年後漢史，從《後漢紀》裡找出魏晉史學的元素，檢視《後漢紀》中的史學內涵，以及身為一時文宗而著史的袁宏其史學素養的層次。最後，則再深入作者的思想層面，從《後漢紀》中探索作者袁宏所灌注其中的思想，甚至將觸角延伸至魏晉整個時代思想觀念的影響因素。The present edition of Hou Han Ji was viewed as the complete ancient literature about dynastic history. Not only was this book earlier than Book of Later Han by Fan Ye in the time of publishing, it was also more important than Book of Later Han in the value of historic materials based on the study of Later Han Dynasty history. Although the present edition of Hou Han Ji remains the outline of its original edition after a period of time without being valued, there are many omissions and errors in its content. Moreover, many historical events in this book are far different from the ones in other historic books about Later Han Dynasty history. The purpose of this study is to make sure its historic-material value of this book regarding Later Han Dynasty history through proofreading the content of the historic literature, to inspect the meaning of Yuan Hong's compiling this book in Chinese historiography, and to analyze Yuan's ideas of compiling historic documents. In other words, I hope to understand Hou Han Ji and its author, Yuan Hong thoroughly and deeply.
In order to match the subject and approach of this dissertation, the sorts of historic materials, based on the content, are separately “separate editions of Hou Han Ji ”, “other ancient literature related to Later Han history”, “the studies related to Yuan Hong”, “the studied literature of Chinese traditional historiography and thought”, “other literature related to Chinese historiography” in order. It is necessary for studying Hou Han Ji that all other ancient historic materials and literature related to Later Han history and Hou Han Ji must have proofread each other so as to check or supplement and correct historical events. Finally, it is hoped that I can find the unique characteristics belonged to Hou Han Ji in all the historic literature about Later Han history. Of the six sorts of historic materials, the latter three ones include the achievements of the predecessors' research on Chinese traditional historiography and Yuan Hong. I hope to explore precisely the values and significance of Hou Han Ji by assistance these achievements of the predecessors' research.
In research method, first, explore the circulation and publishing of Hou Han Ji and its values of historic material. Second, make a thorough analysis of the historical events Hou Han Ji recorded. Third, explore the inner meaning further, for instance, creation conditions of historic writings, author's method, even author's creation thought. I adopted many kinds of methods to utilize alternately to discuss a lot of perspectives of this piece of historic writing. In details, I took the historic method as the core, and made good use of the analysis method and the synthesis method at times in process. And then, I took the historic comparison method and the psycho-analysis method as the assistance.
Hou Han Ji was the principal part of this dissertation. There were three gradations of approaches to exploring this subject. The research took the development of historic literature to approach the circulation and value of a piece of historic writing. The scholars of Ch'ing Dynasty, Jiang Guozuo, Chen Pu, Niu Yongjian, and modern scholars, Zhou Tianyou, Zhang Lie, devoted themselves to proofreading of this book. I analyzed further the historical events Hou Han Ji had recorded on the basis of the research results of these senior scholars, and explored the literature value of this piece of dynastic writing. Moreover, I took the development of Chinese traditional historiography to approach how to bring an annual historic record of Later Han Dynasty forth during the Eastern Jin Dynasty. I planned to find out a lot of elements Chinese historiography during Wei-Jin Era from Hou Han Ji. And then, I made use of these elements to inspect the connotation of historiography of Hou Han Ji, and the general capacity of historiography of Yuan Hong, as a literature master at that time. Finally, dig into the author's concept level. I explored the thought which Yuan Hong had poured into Hou Han Ji, even extended to the factors that the thought of Wei-Jin Era influenced the author.第一章 緒論 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 1
一、研究動機﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 1
二、研究回顧﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 6
三、研究目的與方法﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 16
四、章節綱要 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 18
第二章 《後漢紀》與其史事﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 21
第一節 《後漢紀》之傳世 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 21
一、北宋大中祥符前《後漢紀》的傳行﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 22
二、刊而不傳時期 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 26
三、明嘉靖以降的復甦 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 27
第二節 《後漢紀》之史事疑議﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 30
一、數字與時間的錯誤 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 31
二、身分職務的錯誤 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 34
三、輿地與史事內容的錯誤 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 39
第三節 《後漢紀》對後漢史之價值 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 43
一、漢末事記載詳盡 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 47
二、存異史文 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 48
三、補《後漢書》之不足 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 50
四、獨存的記載 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 53
第三章 《後漢紀》之編纂 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 63
第一節 二體交游 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 64
一、編年體的變革 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 64
二、兩晉時期二體關係 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 70
三、《後漢紀》與「新式編年體」 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 73
第二節 史法體例 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 79
一、體裁規則 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 80
二、體例問題 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 87
三、編纂方法 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 91
第三節 盛興的史論風氣 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 95
一、兩晉前史籍史論發展 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 96
二、史論的文體與內容 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 98
三、《後漢紀》史論 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 101
第四章 《後漢紀》之思想 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 107
第一節 政論 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 107
一、論人治 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 109
二、論制度與禮法 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 120
三、論政策與施為 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 123
第二節 「務飾玄言」析論 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 125
一、名理與自然 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 126
二、性之異別與應世之道 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 129
三、袁宏之謙論與《易》學 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 132
第三節 以史明玄——「通古今而篤名教」之思想內涵﹍ 137
一、建構史玄關係 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 138
二、今不如古——久失名教之義 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 140
三、以史為憑、篤行名教 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 146
第五章 結論 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 155
一、《後漢紀》版本的擇取與運用﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 155
二、學術藩籬未定下的史學家 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 157
三、玄史相輔、通史致用 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 158
徵引書目 ﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍﹍ 16
A Buried Past: The Tomb Inscription (Muzhiming) and Official Biographies of Wang Chuzhi (863-923).
No full textTh e present article investigates the tomb inscription of Wang Chuzhi (863-923), a militarygovernor whose career spanned the end of the Tang and the beginning of the Five Dynasties. By comparing the inscription with representations of the deceased in offi cial sources,the article reveals that the tomb inscription presents a critical attitude toward the moral standards of conventional historiography, and demonstrates a shifting moral geography in the works of Song historians. Th is new standard increasingly excluded nomadic peoples from the newly imagined political body, and excluded with them the pragmatic diplomacy that had characterized the politics of the Five Dynasties. Cet article analyse l’inscription funéraire de Wang Chuzhi (863-923). Ce gouverneur militaire vécut à la fi n des Tang et au début de la période des Cinq Dynasties. La comparaison de l’inscription à diverses représentations du défunt contenues dans les sources offi cielles montre la manière dont l’auteur de l’inscription critique les standards moraux de l’historiographie offi cielle. Elle montre aussi le cadre géographique mouvant dans lequel s’appliquait la morale Song : les populations nomades étaient de plus en plus exclues du corps politique tel qu’il était alors imaginé ; la diplomatie pragmatique qui avait dominé la période des Cinq Dynasties était abandonnée
- …
