113,923 research outputs found
Oral and Maxillo-facial Bone Reconstruction
No full textContains fulltext :
127344.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 17 juni 2014Promotores : Jansen, J.A., Tideman, H. Co-promotor : Goh, B.T
Classification of Pelvic Floor Fistulas (‘Vesicovaginal/Rectovaginal’): A Review
No full textPelvic floor fistulas are abnormal communications between the lower urinary tract and/or anorectum and the female genital tract. Classification systems for female pelvic floor fistulas have existed for over 150 years. At present, there is no consensus on a classification system. Traditionally, classification systems were used for obstetric fistulas. Earlier classification systems were descriptive (small/large/simple/complex) to communicate clinical findings. More recently, classification systems, in particular the Goh and Waaldijk systems, have been tested to predict the outcome of surgical closure and the risk of post-fistula closure urinary incontinence. Conclusions: Features of the fistula may predict outcomes following fistula surgery but other patient features and surgical experience and skill also play a role in the results
Co-attention-Based Pairwise Learning for Author Name Disambiguation
No full textDigital libraries face a pressing issue of author name ambiguity. This paper proposes a novel pairwise learning model for author name disambiguation, utilizing self-attention and co-attention mechanisms. The model integrates textual, discrete, and co-author attributes, amongst others, to capture comprehensive information from bibliographic records. It incorporates an optional random projection-based dimension reduction technique for efficiency to handle large datasets. The attention weight visualizations provide explanations for the model’s predictions. Our experiments on a substantial bibliographic catalogue repository validate the model’s effectiveness using accuracy, F1, and ROC AUC scores.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
A new poly-Si TFT pixel circuit scheme for an active-matrix organic light emitting diode displays
No full textAppropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Introduction: Comparative Dimensions of Law in Context
No full textEmeritus Professor Mary Hiscock is a foremost Australian legal scholar in Comparative Law. She has, over the course of her long and distinguished academic career, positively contributed to scholarship, practice and education in Comparative Law. This edited volume brings together Australian and international legal scholars to honour her in this festschrift in celebration of her 80th birthday
Stress analysis of carotid plaque based on in vivo MRI of acute symptomatic and asymptomatic patients
No full textStress analysis within carotid plaques based on in vivo MR imaging has shown to be useful for the identification of vulnerable atheroma. This study is to investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based-biomechanical stress analysis of carotid plaques can differentiate acute symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. 54 asymptomatic and 45 acute symptomatic patients underwent in vivo multi-contrast MRI of the carotid arteries. Plaque geometry used for finite element analysis was derived from in vivo MR images at the site of maximum and minimum plaque burden. In total 198 slices were used for the computational simulations. A pre shrink technique was used to refine the simulation. Maximum principle stress at the vulnerable plaque sites (i.e. critical stress) was extracted for the selected slices and a comparison was performed between the two groups. Critical stress at the site of maximum plaque burden is significantly higher in acute symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic patients [median: 198.0kPa (inter quartile range (IQR) = (119.8 - 359.0) vs. 138.4kPa (83.8, 242.6), p=0.04]. No significant difference was found at the minimum plaque burden site between the two groups [196.7kPa (133.3- 282.7) vs. 182.4kPa (117.2 - 310. 6), p=0.82). Stress analysis at the site of maximal plaque burden can be effectively used for differentiating acute symptomatic carotid plaques from asymptomatic plaques. This maybe potentially used for development of biomechanical risk stratification criteria based on plaque burden in future studies
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
The construction of Karen Karnak: The multi-author-function
No full textThis thesis is situated within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia, and explores the mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture compared to that of a Read/Only tradition. The hypothesis of this study is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such, represents new functions and attributes, distinct from a more conventional concept of authorship, in which the roles of audience and author are more separate. Read/Write and participatory culture, as defined by this study, is focused on collaboration, and includes the influences of D.I.Y. culture, Open-Source practices and the production of text by multiple authors. Multi-authorship presents a re-thinking of several concepts which support the notion of the individual author, since the focus of multi-authorship is not on attribution and ownership of a finished text, but on the continued malleability of a text. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Alan Smithee and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, whilst concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names form an important context to this study, since primary research involves the construction of an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology and the interaction of thirty nine participants, who are invited to create a body of work under the collective pseudonym Karen Karnak. The data generated by this experiment is analysed using aspects of Michel Foucault's author-function to identify and determine power structures inherent in the WikiMedia context. The interplay of power structures, including concepts such as identity, ownership and the body of work, affect the resulting mode of authorship and contribute to the construction of Karen Karnak, suggesting further areas of research into the emerging multi-author
- …
