1,720,954 research outputs found
Evaluasi Pelayanan Rawat Jalan RS X pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 melalui Segmenting, Targeting dan Positioning
No full textPandemi Covid-19 membuat perubahan besar pada layanan rumah sakit klinik rawat jalan di Indonesia. Perubahan dalam layanan rawat jalan termasuk perubahan alur masuk rawat jalan sesuai protokol kesehatan dimana pasien harus memakai masker, melakukan prosedur skrining, dan membatasi pendamping pasien bahkan pemisahan layanan untuk pasien Covid-19 dan non-Covid-19. Dengan adanya perubahan tersebut, rumah sakit perlu mengembangkan strategi yang efektif untuk mempertahankan angka kunjungan klinik rawat jalan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendapatkan gambaran evaluasi pelayanan rawat jalan di RS X tahun 2020 melalui segmenting, targeting dan positioning sebagai strategi ke depan.Desain penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif, cross sectional dengan menggunakan sampel laporan survei pasien rawat jalan dan laporan kinerja pasien rawat jalan RS X tahun 2020.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelanggan rawat jalan Rumah Sakit X berdomisili di luar wilayah kecamatan rumah sakit (50,1%), pelanggan wanita terbanyak, dan penanggung biaya paling banyak pribadi (83,8%). Jumlah kunjungan rawat jalan selama pandemi mengalami penurunan sebesar 55,63%. Namun tetap saja meskipun banyak protokol baru yang dibutuhkan, kepuasan pasien terhadap pelayanan rawat jalan sebesar 97%, pelayanan kefarmasian rawat jalan sebesar 92,1% dan kesulitan mendapatkan tempat parkir pada saat kunjungan rawat jalan hanya 16,6%.Dengan masih tingginya kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap pelayanan RS X, manajemen disarankan segera menerapkan strategi yang tepat untuk meningkatkan jumlah kunjungan pasien rawat jalan selama pandemi ini.Kata kunci: evaluasi rawat jalan, segmenting, targeting, positionin
BIAYA PENGOBATAN PASIEN RAWAT INAP COVID-19 DI RUMAH SAKIT X TAHUN 2021
Get PDFPandemi COVID-19 telah menyebabkan berbagai rumah sakit di dunia mengalami kesulitan dalam memberikan pelayanan karena jumlah pasien melonjak dengan waktu singkat. Pandemi yang meluas dengan mortalitas yang tinggi di berbagai belahan negara mengakibatkan rawat inap pasien karena penyakit COVID-19 menjadi tinggi sehingga biaya perawatannya pun mengalami peningkatan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melakukan analisis biaya pengobatan COVID-19 pasien rawat inap Rumah Sakit X. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang berasal dari data INA-CBGs dan rekam medis sebanyak 1,196 sampel dalam periode Agustus 2020 sampai dengan April 2021. Uji statistik menggunakan Mann Whitney Test, Kruskal Wallis Test dan Spearman Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan biaya rata-rata pengobatan pasien rawat inap COVID-19 di RS X adalah Rp 43,595,339.94. Selisih biaya riil pengobatan pasien rawat inap COVID-19 dengan biaya klaim sebesar positif Rp. 48,622,313.07. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi peningkatan biaya pengobatan pasien rawat inap COVID19 di RS X adalah usia lanjut (> 60 tahun), jenis kelamin laki-laki, tingkat pendidikan perguruan tinggi, tingkat keparahan dengan gejala sedang, memiliki penyakit penyerta, lama rawat, status keluar dengan sembuh, Dokter Penanggung Jawab Pasien (DPJP) adalah spesialis paru dan kolaborasi dokter > 3 dokter
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
