1,720,960 research outputs found

    The relative endogenous expression levels of the IFNAR2 isoforms influence the cytostatic and pro-apoptotic effect of IFNa on pleomorphic sarcoma cells

    No full text
    Based on our previous studies where we found that IFNAR2-1, the short IFNalpha/beta receptor variant, was expressed in pleomorphic sarcoma cells, we decided to determine the relative levels of expression of IFNAR2.1 versus the longer form, named IFNAR2.2, in different pleomorphic sarcoma cells in relation to their response to interferon alpha treatment. When examining a panel of PS cells isolated from surgical specimens, we found that IFNAR2.1 prevailed in 6 out 7 lines analysed and that these generally showed cell cycle arrest and low levels of apoptosis upon IFNalpha treatment. The reverse ratio, i.e. higher constitutive levels of IFNAR2.2 than IFNAR2.1, was associated with an irreversible inhibition of cell growth and pronounced apoptosis. Impairment of tumour growth by low- and high-dose IFNalpha treatment of nude mice inoculated with PS cells expressing predominantly IFNAR2.1 further asserted the effect of the cytokine also in vivo. A proteomic analysis of 120 signalling components in growth arrested, apoptotic PS cells harbouring higher levels of IFNAR2.2 revealed engagement of the canonical Jak/Stat/ISGF3-pathway, the activation of the mitochodrial apoptotic pathway and a potentially novel mechanism of cell cycle blockade unrelated to down-regulation of cyclin A/B and their interacting/regulating kinases. Our results confirm the dominant negative role of IFNAR2.1, but also suggest that the relative endogenous levels of the two IFNalpha/beta receptor isoforms may dictate the signalling pathways triggered by the ligand, such as to cause exclusively cell cycle arrest or induce programmed cell death. This parameter may be of importance for the clinical outcome of IFNalpha treatment of PS

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore