1,720,987 research outputs found
Vickermann-Ribémont Gabriele, Adam et Ève et la pensée des Lumières entre fondement du droit et questionnement du mythe, Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal, coll. « Mythographies et sociétés », Clermont-Ferrand, 2014, 198 p.
No full textFormé de neuf contributions qui résultent de la collaboration d’historiens, de littéraires, de philosophes et de linguistes, l’ouvrage, ainsi que l’indique son titre, s’attache à étudier la diffusion et l’exploitation du mythe fondateur d’Adam et Ève au siècle des Lumières. L’enjeu de la confrontation au récit adamique est clairement indiqué dans la savante introduction de Gabriele Vickermann-Ribémont, qui signale le conflit au xviiie siècle « entre, d’une part, une adhésion entière et littér..
Entre Ancrage Juridique et Tradition Littéraire: <i>La Pupille</i> de Fagan et Les Tuteurs de Molière
No full text
Entre ancrage juridique et tradition littéraire : « La Pupille » de Fagan et les tuteurs de Molière
Get PDFThe best-known comedy written by Eighteenth-century minor dramatic author Fagan, The Pupille (1734), is to be understood against the background of the matrimonial law of the French Ancien Regime. The royal law article called « rapt de séduction », which inspired much of the contemporary literary production,
gives full authority to parents or guardians, as opposed to the Catholic doctrine privileging free consent of parties. La Pupille plays a particular role in this context because the comedy does not ridicule either parents or guardians, and works out a marriage against their will; on the contrary, Fagan’s guardian is most comprehensive and will therefore prepare the final surprise
L’Anecdote entre historiette et emblème ou comment réécrire la vie d’un poète
No full textInternational audienc
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
