1,721,256 research outputs found

    Intuizione e calcolo nella progettazione dell strutture. E - SCHEMATIZZAZIONE E CALCOLO DEGLI ELEMENTI STRUTTURALI (Cerone M e Giorgi V coll)

    No full text
    E - SCHEMATIZZAZIONE E CALCOLO DEGLI ELEMENTI STRUTTURALI (Cerone M e Giorgi V coll) 110 tavole 48x34

    La natura degli accordi di ristrutturazione del debito: la notte della Cassazione e il «nuovo ordine» delle procedure concorsuali.

    No full text
    Nel contributo si esamina criticamente il recente orientamento della giurisprudenza di legittimità volto a riconoscere la natura di "istituto concorsuale" o addirittura "procedura concorsuale" agli accordi di ristrutturazione del debito, evidenziandone l'infondatezza

    ABOUT THE GEORGIAN TITULATURE OF GIORGI V THE BRILLIANT

    No full text
    https://geohistory.humanities.tsu.ge/ge/procedings/83-shromebi/178-shromebi-19.htmlWe have very little information about Giorgi the Brilliant, and what we have, they do not record the full Georgian title of the king. In the document of Giorgi V that has reached us, unfortunately, the full title of the king is not written. Only the last phrase of the title is recorded. If we take into account the titles of the kings of the united Georgia, it is clear that the beginning of the titles would be – “By the will of God, the king of the Abkhazians, Kartvelians, Ranians, Kakhetian and Armenians, Sharvansha and Shahansha.” Another point to be considered is that from the end of the 14th century another formulation appears in the title of the Bagrations – the owner of Likht-Imer and Likht-Amer and the unifier of both kingdoms. For the first time such a title is confirmed in the 1393 charter of Giorgi VII. Then similar formula can be found already in the charters of 1413, 1419, 1420 and 1441 of Alexander I. The question arises, when should the formula – owner of Likht-Imer and Likht-Amer appear? Only after the unity of the divided kingdom was restored, and it happened during the reign of Giorgi the Brilliant. Theoretically, the title – “owner of Likht-Imer and Likht-Amer” could be accepted for the first time by: Giorgi V the Brilliant, David IX, Bagrat V or even Giorgi VII. Why was it necessary to introduce this title? The traditional titulature no longer reflected reality (for several centuries there were no more Abkhazian, Kartvelian, Ranian and Kakhetian kingdoms) and to some extent reflected “frozen reality”. They needed a title that reflected the reality of that era and would be understandable to everyone. “Owener Licht-Imer and Licht-Amer” was a formula, which reflected this situation. In our opinion, the full Georgian title of Giorgi the Brilliant could have been – the king of Abkhazians, Kartvelians, Ranians, Kakhetians and Armenians, Sharvansha and Shahansha, the unifier of Likht-Imer and Likht-Amer, the ruler of all the East and West

    Epidemiological features and prognostic parameters of multiple primary melanomas in CDKN2A-mutations patients

    No full text
    The occurrence of multiple primary melanomas(MPM) is quite rare with an estimated incidence ranging from 0.2% to 8.6%(Buljan M et al.2010). However, the risk of developing a primary melanoma is increased in patients with a history of a previous melanoma compared with the general population (De Giorgi et al.,2012). Between 6 and 14% of MPM cases occur in individuals with a family history of disease (Ang CG et al.1998), suggesting a genetic component in the pathogenesis of MPM. Germline mutations in the CDKN2A gene have been widely reported as the most common cause of inherited susceptibility to melanoma (Palmieri G et al., 2009). In the literature,CDKN2A germline mutations have been identified in less than 2% of single primary melanoma cases, 8 to 12% of sporadic MPM cases and 47% of MPM patients with familial melanoma (De Giorgi V et al.,2014;Puig S et al.,2005). This article is protected by copyrigh

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore