1,721,195 research outputs found

    Letter: Ida M. Tarbell to Frank Sullivan, July 13, 1931

    No full text
    The article of Frank Sullivan that is referred to in this letter is on file. Sullivan, Frank. My Diary, The New Yorker, July 11, 193

    Letter: Ida M. Tarbell to Frank Sullivan, July 13, 1931

    No full text
    The article of Frank Sullivan that is referred to in this letter is on file. Sullivan, Frank. My Diary, The New Yorker, July 11, 193

    Final transcript of AFL-CIO oral history interview with Irving Brown by Frank Sullivan, October 1979

    No full text
    This is the final transcript of AFL-CIO oral history interview with Irving Brown by Frank Sullivan, October 1979. Includes photocopy of article written by Irving Brown entitled "American Policies in the Third World: Lessons Learned from Vietnam" from Labor and International Affairs, Volume II. For complete collection information, visit the full finding aid at http://hdl.handle.net/1903.1/4247

    Frank Sullivan, Jr.

    No full text
    Frank Sullivan, Jr., was born in South Bend, Indiana. A graduate of Dartmouth College (A.B., 1972) in New Hampshire, Sullivan returned to Indiana to serve as a caucus assistant in the Indiana House of Representatives. He then traveled to Washington, D. C., where he served as a legislative assistant to Representatives Edward Roush (1974) and John Brademas (1974-1979). He returned to Indiana again to attend the Indiana University School of Law, receiving his J. D. in 1982. Sullivan joined the firm of Barnes and Thornburg, in Indianapolis, where he practiced corporate and securities law for the next seven years. In 1989 Governor Evan Bayh appointed Sullivan Indiana State Budget Director, a position he would hold until his appointment as the governor’s fiscal policy adviser in 1992. On November 1, 1993, Bayh appointed Sullivan the 102nd justice of the Indiana Supreme Court. In addition to his duties on the court, Sullivan has served as Chair of the American Bar Association’s Appellate Judges Conference, and as Chair of the ABA Judicial Clerkship Program. Sullivan has also been the Chair, “and principle steward,” of the state of Indiana’s Judicial Technology and Automation Committee, a committee that was formed to “provide leadership and governance regarding the use of technology in Indiana Courts.” Always looking for new challenges, Sullivan received a master’s of law degree from the University of Virginia in 2001 and in 2007 began teaching a course on the legal aspects of government finance at the Indiana University McKinney School of Law. Throughout his term on the court Sullivan spoke at public forums and wrote articles on legal issues in scholarly and bar related publications. Sullivan retired from the bench in 2012 and became Professor of Practice at the McKinney School of Law. Sullivan is currently a member of the Maurer School of Law\u27s Board of Visitors.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/notablealumni/1037/thumbnail.jp

    Frank Sullivan, Jr.

    No full text
    Frank Sullivan, Jr., was born in South Bend, Indiana. A graduate of Dartmouth College (A.B., 1972) in New Hampshire, Sullivan returned to Indiana to serve as a caucus assistant in the Indiana House of Representatives. He then traveled to Washington, D. C., where he served as a legislative assistant to Representatives Edward Roush (1974) and John Brademas (1974-1979). He returned to Indiana again to attend the Indiana University School of Law, receiving his J. D. in 1982. Sullivan joined the firm of Barnes and Thornburg, in Indianapolis, where he practiced corporate and securities law for the next seven years. In 1989 Governor Evan Bayh appointed Sullivan Indiana State Budget Director, a position he would hold until his appointment as the governor’s fiscal policy adviser in 1992. On November 1, 1993, Bayh appointed Sullivan the 102nd justice of the Indiana Supreme Court. In addition to his duties on the court, Sullivan has served as Chair of the American Bar Association’s Appellate Judges Conference, and as Chair of the ABA Judicial Clerkship Program. Sullivan has also been the Chair, “and principle steward,” of the state of Indiana’s Judicial Technology and Automation Committee, a committee that was formed to “provide leadership and governance regarding the use of technology in Indiana Courts.” Always looking for new challenges, Sullivan received a master’s of law degree from the University of Virginia in 2001 and in 2007 began teaching a course on the legal aspects of government finance at the Indiana University McKinney School of Law. Throughout his term on the court Sullivan spoke at public forums and wrote articles on legal issues in scholarly and bar related publications. Sullivan retired from the bench in 2012 and became Professor of Practice at the McKinney School of Law. Sullivan is currently a member of the Maurer School of Law\u27s Board of Visitors.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/notablealumni/1037/thumbnail.jp

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore