1,720,959 research outputs found
Pernyataan Bersama Antara Panitia Urusan Piutang Negara dengan Debitur dalam Kaitannya dengan Pengurusan Kredit Macet Ditinjau dari Hukum Perjanjian
No full textSetiap kredit macet yang berasal dari bank pemerintah diserahkan pengurusannya kepada Panitia Urusan Piutang Negara (PUPN) berdasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 49 Prp Tahun 1960 Tentang Panitia Urusan Piutang Negara. PUPN mem punyai kewenangan untuk melakukan pengurusan piutang negara dengan menerbitkan keputusan-keputusan hukum, salah satunya yaitu Pernyataan Bersama. Pernyataan Bersama meru pakan suatu kesepakatan atau persetujuan antara debitur atau penanggung hutang dengan Ketua PUPN yang dituangkan dalam bentuk surat yang berisikan pengakuan hutang dari debitur atau penanggung hutang dan atau penjamin hutang untuk membayar sekaligus seluruh hutangnya kepada negara. Berdasarkan latar belakang di atas perlu dibahas mengenai bagaimana pelaksanaan Pernyataan Bersama tersebut ditinjau dari Huku m Perjan jian dan meng enai k endala yang dihadapi dalam Pernyataan Bersama tersebut.
Untuk membahas permasalahan itu dilakukan penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Lokasi penelitian di kota Padang, sebagai sampel PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk Cabang Padang, PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Cabang Padang dan PT. Bank Nagari Cabang Padang. Responden ditetapkan secara random sebanyak 30 orang debitur dan informan 12 orang . Alat pengumpulan data primer adalah pedoman wawancara, kuesioner dan check list. Sedangkan data sekunder dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan. Analisis data dilakukan dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa:
1. Dalam pelaksanaan Pernyataan Bersama antara PUPN dengan debitur dalam pengurusan kredit macet berlangsung sesuai dengan asas kebebasan berkontrak dan kedudukan antara PUPN dengan debitur seimbang. Pada Pernyataan Bersama sudah ada format standarnya yang harus ditandatangani oleh debitur; sama halnya dengan perjanjian kredit pada suatu bank. Akan tetapi Pernyataan Bersama memuat pengakuan hutang dan berkekuatan hukum tetap karena Pernyataan Bersama memuat irah-irah Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa
2. Kendala-kendala yang ditemui dalam pelaksanaan Pernyataan Bersama antara PUPN dan debitur, yaitu: a) pihak debitur tidak memenuhi panggilan KP3 N untuk melaksanakan wawancara dalam rangka pelaksanaan Pernyataan Bersama; b) debitur tidak mau mengakui jumlah hutang yang telah diserahkan oleh penyerah hutang (BNI, BRI. BPD), dengan alasan hutang mereka tidak sebanyak yang tertera dalam Berkas Kasus Piutang Negara (BKPN); c) debitur meminta hutang tersebut dihitung ulang; d) debitur tidak mau menandatangani Pernyataan Bersama; e) debitur takut karena dipengaruhi atau diancam oleh pihak ketiga.Every unpaid credit from Government Bank is given to Committee of State Affair (PUPN) based on Law Number 49 Prp of 1960 about PUPN. PUPN has authority to do state credit affairs by publishing legal decisions, one of that is Mutual Agreement. Mutual Agreement is as an agreement or accord between debitor or debt warrantor with the head of PUPN which is poured in the letter form that contain debt creed or debt warrantor and/or debt guaranty to pay full all of his that to the government. Based on the above back ground, it is necessary to study about how the Mutual Agreement is viewed from Contract Law and about the obstacles that stated in the mutual agreement.
A descriptive analytical research was done to study the problems. The research location is Padang City, as samples are PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk Branch of Padang, PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia and PT. Bank Nagari Branch of Padang. There are 30 debitors as respondents were chosen by random method and 12 informants. The primary data collectors are interview direction, questionnaire and check list. Where as the secondary data where collected by literature study. The data analysis was done by the descriptive qualitative method.
The research results show that:
1. In the Mutual Agreement accomplishment between PUPN with the debitor in unpaid credit affairs is viewed from Contract Law is done suitable with freedom contract principle and the position between PUPN and the debitor is balance. There is a standard format on Mutual Agreement that must be sign by debitor, the same as credit contract at a bank. But Mutual Agreement contains debt creed and has an absolute legal power, because Mutual Agreement has an adagium With Justice Based On One Supreme God.
2. The obstacle which are found in the mutual agreement accomplishment between PUPN and debitor idest : a) the debitor side is not fulfill KP3N calling to do interview in the frame of Mutual Agreement accomplishment; b) the debitor does not creed of total debit that has be given by debit giver (BNI, BRI, BPD) with a reason that their debit is not as much as stated in the File of State Credit Case (BKPN); c) the debitor asked for recalculate the debit; d) the debitor does not want to sign the Mutual Agreement. e) the debitor fear because is influenced or threatened by the third party.5 HalamanTesis Magiste
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DENGAN KLAUSULA ARBITRASE DI MAHKAMAH AGUNG
Full text linkSettling disputes in court can be a time-consuming and exhausting process. Therefore, the availability of arbitration as an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is one of the efforts to achieve faster solutions and dispute resolutions. However, in some cases in the Supreme Court, there are disputes that contain arbitration clauses in the agreement, yet they are still submitted to court and decided by the court. This research aims to examine the disappearing in-depth study of legal certainty in dispute resolution with arbitration clauses by analyzing several verdicts. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a legislative and case approach. The research results show that in reality, even if an agreement is made with an arbitration clause, the parties still file a lawsuit in the general court on the pretext of unlawful acts and/or the involvement of third parties outside the agreemen
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
