1,725,480 research outputs found

    F. Lee Bailey speaking.

    No full text
    Inscribed: F. Lee Bailey Page 1 ; possibly defense attorney Francis Lee Baileyhttps://egrove.olemiss.edu/leslie/1224/thumbnail.jp

    62/08/01 Letter from F. Lee Bailey to Russ Sherman

    Get PDF
    F. Lee Bailey asks Russ Sherman to be his co-counsel on the Sheppard case

    Edwin F. Lee

    Get PDF
    An obituary for Methodist missionary and bishop Edwin F. Lee

    Letter from F. Lee Bailey to BVPD Chief Drenkhan with a theory about the Houks

    Get PDF
    This document is a letter sent from F. Lee Bailey to BVPD Chief Drenkhan in 1966. Bailey shares with Chief Drenkhan all that I presently know about this matter. Bailey concludes that the Houks killed Marilyn through analyzing certain facts and circumstances of the case

    Edwin F. Lee

    Get PDF
    An obituary for Methodist missionary and bishop Edwin F. Lee

    Edwin F. Lee

    Get PDF
    An obituary for Methodist missionary and bishop Edwin F. Lee

    Mrs. F. Lee

    No full text
    Headshot of Mrs. F. Lee, a fifth and sixth grade teacher at the Nashville Christian Institute in 1962.https://digitalcollections.lipscomb.edu/nci_head/1026/thumbnail.jp

    F. Lee Bailey (S2_B41_F2_025)

    No full text
    Close up of F. Lee Bailey, a criminal defense attorney in the case of Dr. Sam Sheppard, seated holding a cigarette. Bailey visited the University of Akron for 1966 Law Day

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore