3,172 research outputs found
Per Francesco De Sanctis.
No full textBibliographical references in "Note" (p. [45]).Commemorazione di F. De Sanctis.--Lettere inedite.--Una circolare del ministro De Sanctis.--L'offesa a Napoli.--Francesco De Sanctis e la sua seconda scuola.--Dal "Libro della scuola" [di Francesco De Sanctis].Mode of access: Internet
Benedetto Croce, Prefazione a F. De Sanctis, Le Lettere da Zurigo a Diomede Marvasi (1913).
No full textSi ripubblica la prefazione a F. De Sanctis, Lettere da Zurigo a Diomede Marvasi. 1856-1860. Pubblicate da Elisabetta Marvasi, con prefazione e note di B. Croce, Napoli, Ricciardi, 1913, pp. XIII-XVI. Non ripubblicata vivente l'autore
Sermones aurei de sanctis.
No full text222 f. ; 4º (22 cm.)Datos do pé de imp. tomados do colofón -- L. gót. (53G) ; 53-54 lín. -- Min. p. inic. -- Sin.: a-z8, A-B8, C-D6, E10 -- Texto imp. a dúas col. -- Marca tip. xil. en E10r. -- Rexistro, colofón -- Na port.: Sermones Aurei de sanctis fratris Leonardi de Utino
Il concetto corporale De Sanctis e la “concezione” dantesca
No full textThe present essay focuses on De Sanctis’ Lectures on Dante, held during his exile in Turin and Zürich, in order to show how aesthetics, politics and religion converge in his works. De Sanctis reads Dante’s journey throughout Hell, Purgatory and Paradise both as a diary and a drama, which reintroduces action, passions and a multitude of feelings in the peace and stillness that rule the kingdom of God after the final Judgment. De Sanctis tries to illustrate how Dante unifies body and concept, moving from allegories and personifications towards figures and real people, such as Beatrice, Francesca, Vanni Fucci and Ugolino. Dante’s conception of the relationship between history and eternity plays a leading role in De Sanctis’ reworking of Hegel’s Aesthetics
Hegel e De Sanctis. Scienza, arte, vita
No full textLa lettura offerta da De Sanctis sulla morte dell'arte hegelian
Recommended from our members
Francesco De Sanctis interprete del Rinascimento
No full textThe critics are fairly unanimous in recognizing that De Sanctis had an overall negative judgement of Renaissance. In this essay I propose to reconsider such a common interpretation in the light of the studies De Sanctis made during his exile in Switzerland, examining in particular the attention dedicated to the Republican Machiavelli and the influence that the widespread Swiss Republican culture had on his thought. I will also prove that De Sanctis proposes a bifocal idea of the concept of Renaissance, as it emerges in particular from his Storia della letteratura italiana, presenting an interpretative ambivalence that cannot be reduced to a mere negative evaluation. It is actually necessary to examine the re-evaluation that the author proposes of the philosophical and scientific thought of the main protagonists of modernity, and in particular of Machiavelli
De Sanctis e la storiografia letteraria italiana
No full textL'autore analizzza l'impatto della «Storia della letteratura italiana» di Francesco De Sanctis sulla storiografia italiana del xx secolo, rilevando come la linea storicistica «lineare» di De Sanctis sia stata assunta come modello storiografico di tutte le Storie letterarie successive ma come nel contempo sia stata oggetto anche di una riduzione ideologica, da Croce a Gentile, a Gramsci, con la sottolineatura degli aspetti «militanti» della sua opera. De San ctis ha concepito la sua «Storia» in funzione del processo unitario risorgimentale: soltanto Carlo Dionisotti ha criticato le ragioni storiche di tale modello proponendone acutamente uno radicalmente alternativo, di tipo geografico-storico,che recentemente ha iniziato a produrre i suoi risultati, anche a livello formativo.The author analyses the impact of the «Storia della letteratura italiana» by Francesco De Sanctis about the Italian historiography of the Twentieth century, pointing out how the his toricist line by De Sanctis has established itself as a historiographical model for the whole later literary history while, at the same time, it proposes an ideological reduction, from Croce and Gentile, to Gramsci, with the underlining of the «militant» aspects of his work. De Sanctis has conceived his «Storia» in relationship with the unitary process of the Risorgimento: only Carlo Dionisotti has criticised the historical reasons of such a model, and has aptly proposed a radical alternative one of a historical-geographical type. This alternative has recently begun to achieve results at a formative level
Case series of two different dose regimen Rituximab therapy for severe Pemphigus
No full textRituximab is a monoclonal antibody approved for treatment of adults with severe and refractory pemphigus vulgaris. Concerns about side effects and high costs of conventional doses have rised the hypothesis that low-dose rituximab regimen may be cost-effective with a better safety profile. Here we report our experience of seven patients with extensive/recalcitrant pemphigus, who either were steroid dependent, had contraindications or refused conventional treatment. Two patients received conventional rituximab (1000 mg 2 weeks apart) while five received ultra low-dose rituximab (200 mg 2 weeks apart). At 3 months, the two patients treated with high Rituximab regimen showed respectively a complete remission off therapy (CROT) and a complete remission on minimal therapy (CRMT), while among the five patients treated with ultra low-doses, three achieved CROT, one achieved CRMT and one a partial remission off therapy (PROT). All patients treated with ultra low-dose rituximab achieved complete depletion of cd19+ and cd19/45+ B lymphocytes after three months and all patients except one male manteined the zeroing after 6 months. No serious side effect was documented with low dose regimen except for a case of diziness. Our data suggest that ultra low-dose rituximab can be effective even in patients with extensive/recalcitrant pemphigus, with a lower probability of side-effects respect to higher dose regimen and may act as a steroid sparing strategy. Copyright: © 2022 Federica Giuliani, Giulio Gualdi, Paolo De Sanctis, Paolo Amerio
Benedetto Croce, Recensione agli Scritti critici di Francesco De Sanctis (1886).
No full textSi ripubblica la recensione a Francesco De Sanctis, Scritti critici, con prefazione e postille di V. Imbriani (Napoli, A. Morano, 1886), che il giovane Benedetto Croce pubblicò nel 1886 nella ''Rassegna pugliese di scienze, lettere ed arti'' (III, 1886, pp. 127-128), firmandosi con lo pseudonimo murgeriano di ''Gustave Colline''. La recensione non venne mai più ripubblicata vivente l'autore
- …
