1,720,986 research outputs found
Note: E.C. Martin to Ida M. Tarbell, April 8, 1898 and April 20, 1898
No full textHandwritten notes E.C. Martin to Ida M. Tarbell dated April 8, 1898 and April 20, 189
Note: E.C. Martin to Ida M. Tarbell, April 8, 1898 and April 20, 1898
No full textHandwritten notes E.C. Martin to Ida M. Tarbell dated April 8, 1898 and April 20, 189
Letter: H.W. Lanier to E.C. Martin with Addendum to Paul Laurence Dunbar from E.C. Martin
No full textFull text of letter on Doubleday & McClure Co. letterhead from H.W. Lanier to E.C. Martin, followed by Martin\u27s added note to Paul Laurence Dunbar:
January 13, 1900
My dear Martin:
I hope you have explained to Mr. Dunbar the reasons for our long delay in giving an answer regarding The Love of Landry. We are not yet really straightened out but I\u27ve managed to get the particular matter through at last.
As you know, under ordinary circumstances we could only report that 29,000 words is hardly enough to make a book of. But we are just starting a series of Short Novels (very nicely gotten up, bound in cloth, to be sold at socials), for which we anticipate a large sale. The first volume in the series — of course they will all be sold separately — is a story of Anthony Hope. We can\u27t pay more than 10% royalty as we are putting the price way down in order to place a whole lot of the books. Would Mr. Dunbar be willing to let us bring out The Love of Landry in the series with the understand that we shall have the first chance at his next long novel? If so, we will agree to do this and will bring the present book out this spring and see if we can\u27t do something worth while with it.
If you\u27d prefer, we will write to Mr. Dunbar direct, but I suppose this letter will be all that\u27s necessary.
Sincerely,H.W. Lanier
Martin forwarded this letter to Paul Laurence Dunbar with an additional note:
Dear Mr. Dunbar: Here is Mr. Lanier\u27s answer to me for the Doubleday & McClure Co. regarding your book. I forward it to you at once. You can confer directly with them. But if you don\u27t make a deal with them, I hope you\u27ll give us a chance at the book.
Yours truly,E.C. Martinhttps://ecommons.udayton.edu/ohc_dunbar/1600/thumbnail.jp
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
