1,720,965 research outputs found
LIMITASI INFORMASI PUBLIK YANG DIKECUALIKAN TERHADAP PENGANUGERAHAN TANDA KEHORMATAN BINTANG JASA BAGI TERDUGA PELANGGAR HAM
Full text linkThe development of public information disclosure disputes in the realm of the State Administrative Court has been polemic. Relaxation in interpreting exempted information is not clearly specified for the awarding of the title of honorary star of merit, one of which is in Decision Number: 541/G/KI/2023/PTUN.JKT that Joko Widodo awarded an honorary star to Erico Guetteres who has a bad record on human rights (HAM) in 2021. The impropriety of the award through Presidential Decree Number 78 / TK / 2021 is in fact seen from the track record of his crimes in East Timor in 1999. The Ministry of State Secretariat feels that its institution as a public body has the authority to refuse the provision of information that is categorized as exempt from disclosure, one of which contains personal information based on Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning KIP. The Ministry of State Secretariat challenged the opinion of the Panel of Commissioners, which did not pay attention to the personal data of Erico Guetteres and other title recipients. The research method refers to doctrinal which examines the applicable laws and regulations as well as paradigmatic information as the times evolve. The results show that the interpretation of exempted information is not fully standardized due to too many public information rules that are definitively still sectoral. Disharmonization is related to the view of the decision to grant merit marks included in the authentic deed or the type that can be disseminated in the public, not to mention how the disclosure is whether it is only announced or only involves public participation.Praktik perkembangan sengketa keterbukaan informasi publik pada ranah Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara menuai polemik. Relaksasi menafsirkan informasi yang dikecualikan tidak dispesifikasikan secara jelas terhadap pemberian gelar tanda jasa kehormatan bintang jasa utama, salah satunya pada Putusan Nomor: 541/G/KI/2023/PTUN.JKT bahwa Joko Widodo menyerahkan tanda kehormatan kepada Erico Guetteres yang memiliki catatan buruk terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) tahun 2021 lalu. Ketidakwajaran pemberian melalui Keprres Nomor 78/TK/Tahun 2021ini senyatanya dilihat dari rekam jejak atas kejahatannya di Timor Timur tahun 1999 silam. Kemensetneg merasa bahwa lembaganya sebagai badan publik berwenang menolak atas pemberian informasi yang kategorinya dikecualikan untuk dibuka, antara lain salah satunya berisikan informasi pribadi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang KIP. Kemensetneg menentang pendapat Majelis Komisioner yang sama sekali tidak memperhatikan data pribadi Erico Guetteres serta penerima gelar lainnya. Metode penelitian mengacu pada doktrinal yang menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta paradigmatik informasi sebagaimana perkembangan zaman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan penafsiran informasi dikecualikan tidak terstandardisasi secara utuh diakibatkan oleh terlalu banyaknya aturan informasi publik yang secara definitif masih bersifat sektoral. Disharmonisasi terkait pandangan keputusan pemberian tanda jasa masuk dalam akta otentik atau jenis yang dapat disebarkan dalam publik, tak terkecuali bagaimana keterbukaannya apakah hanya diumumkan atau hanya melibatkan partisipasi masyarakat
Redesain Konsep Konsultasi Pembentukan PKPU Dalam Menindaklanjuti Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
No full textThe research aims to identify problems in the implementation of consultation as part of the mechanism of regulation formation between KPU and DPR and the government, especially in following up the Constitutional Court\u27s decision. The research begins by first describing the dynamics of the consultation process and its results, which are passive and tend to be formalistic after the conclusion of the RDP forum is no longer binding based on the Constitutional Court Decision 92/PUU-XIV/2016. This research uses a doctrinal method that refers to the laws and regulations related to the consultation process of the KPU together with the DPR and the government in the formation of regulations. The research aims to identify problems normatively and connect them with legal facts obtained. The research uses analytic-explanatory typology by describing the existing problems to further find the causality (cause-and-effect) of a problem. The results showed that the implementation of the RDP forum was passive and did not even pay attention to the correction of substantive errors such as in PKPU related to the requirements for former convicts to run for office. This phenomenon should be an evaluative study in the legal validity and technical procedures of the RDP forum, which turns out that there is a disharmonization of consultation provisions between the Pilkada Law and the Election Law with the MD3 Law
Hybrid Restorative Justice: Optimizing Cessation Of Prosecution The Case Theft Through Restorative Judicial House
Full text linkThe existence of restorative justice certainly brings a new paradigm in settlement of criminal cases, with the settlement of cases solely out of court. Restorative justice-based law enforcement is manifested in all law enforcement agencies, especially the Prosecutor's Office, in prosecuting cases based on the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of the Year 2020 concerning the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. The amount required to prosecute restoratives can be applied to the crime of theft as the highest case in Indonesia. This happened because Indonesia's disrupted economy after the Covid-19 pandemic created a moral crisis with drastic theft crimes. Meanwhile, it was recently discovered that establishing a restorative justice house in each jurisdiction of the attorney general's office was found to optimize the resolution of all legal problems by screening cases that go to court, socializing the law to residents, and being able to develop local wisdom. Involving local traditional leaders to emphasize deliberation is also another important thing wich must be exereised. This research uses normative legal research methods through applicable laws and regulations and literature study. The legislative approach is sourced from primary data and literature studies. Then in analyzing the problem, the author uses a descriptive analysis approach by applying the deductive method, namely, concluding a general discussion into a specific statement. Of course, the restorative justice house guarantees legal certainty and is an adequate facility in its implementation. Moreover, the Attorney General's Office has also formed a Quick Response Task Force to maximize the role of the restorative justice house by providing input on cases that deserve to be resolved through restorative justice, one of which is the crime of theft, which is happening
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Political Corruption: Rise of Social Aid Politicization by Government in Grassroots Campaign 2024 Elections
Full text linkThe cruciality of 2024 General Election is inseparable from complex shift in democratic landscape as a structural-economic direction of state life. Competition between pairs candidates through their respective electoral political strategies is main focus of the community, one of which is Social Assistance (Bansos) which is often target of electoral commodities at grassroots base. President through his track record is also indicated by politicization Social Assistance by going to several regions to provide indirect support during the 2024 Election, as well as several ministers who further strengthen the indication of political corruption. This research uses a normative method that refers to conceptualization of political corruption and Law 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. The results showed that the identification of political corruption during the election period begins by looking at the policy formulation process which is often manipulated and looking for gray areas, such as the Election Law limiting Bawaslu to only take action against Paslon participants or teams who have registered with the KPU, and the absence of restrictions on the provision of Social Assistance. The discovery of the track record of politicization of social assistance by the government should be suspected during the campaign period ahead of the 2024 Election vote and become an evaluative tool for the government, both from the distribution method to the prohibition in certain moments. We can no longer prevent practices that have occurred, so what is expected is an ideal improvement recommendation for future elections.Krusialitas Pemilu 2024 tidak terlepas dari pergeseran lanskap demokrasi yang kompleks sebagai arah struktural-ekonomi kehidupan bernegara. Persaingan antar paslon melalui strategi politik elektoral masing-masing menjadi sorotan utama masyarakat, salah satunya Bantuan Sosial (Bansos) yang kerap menjadi sasaran komoditas elektoral di basis akar rumput. Presiden melalui rekam jejaknya juga terindikasi melakukan politisasi Bansos dengan turun ke beberapa daerah untuk memberikan dukungan secara tidak langsung pada saat Pemilu 2024, serta beberapa menteri yang semakin menguatkan indikasi korupsi politik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif yang mengacu pada konseptualisasi korupsi politik dan UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa identifikasi korupsi politik pada masa pemilu diawali dengan melihat proses perumusan kebijakan yang seringkali dimanipulasi dan mencari area abu-abu, seperti UU Pemilu yang membatasi Bawaslu hanya dapat menindak Paslon atau timses yang sudah mendaftar ke KPU, dan tidak adanya pembatasan pemberian Bansos. Terungkapnya rekam jejak politisasi bansos oleh pemerintah patut dicurigai pada masa kampanye jelang pemungutan suara Pemilu 2024 dan menjadi alat evaluasi bagi pemerintah, baik dari cara penyaluran hingga pelarangan di momen-momen tertentu. Kita tidak bisa lagi mencegah praktik yang sudah terjadi, sehingga yang diharapkan adalah rekomendasi perbaikan yang ideal untuk pemilu-pemilu selanjutnya
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Implementation of Litigation Mediation in Resolving Medical Negligence Disputes Between Patients and Health Workers
Full text linkNegligence in current medical disputes has not yet obtained legal settlement efforts for both parties, either between the patient, the medical staff, or the hospital. Efforts to resolve medical disputes can be done through two methods: litigation and non-litigation mediation. Determining a dispute resolution model with alternative efforts will minimize doctors' worries as well as stimulate medical personnel to improve the health system and existing errors will become an evaluation of health services later, especially also preventing doctors, patients and other parties from being confronted until a court decision actually damages a person's reputation. doctor. Apart from that, it is also an effort to relieve patient conflict, making it possible for patients undergoing treatment to receive reasonable compensation. Medical disputes should emphasize settlement through the ADR route because it not only provides benefits for both parties but also obtains legal guarantees from each party in court in Indonesia. Because when compared to dispute resolution outside the court, litigation mediation offers more integrative offers because it does not require high costs, takes a long time, and does not incline any party by upholding a win-win solution. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and literature study approach and uses descriptive analysis by applying a deductive method. The results of the study show the effectiveness of the implementation of litigation mediation and penal mediation reform in the criminal law system in Indonesia
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
