1,722,624 research outputs found

    Anderson, Colin N, 42147

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/368485Surname: ANDERSON Given Name(s) or Initials: COLIN N Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 42147 Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 47534178530 Item: [2016.0049.00815] "Anderson, Colin N, 42147

    P. Cloché, La civilisation athénienne (Collection Colin, n° 98), 1927

    No full text
    Mathieu Georges. P. Cloché, La civilisation athénienne (Collection Colin, n° 98), 1927. In: Revue des Études Anciennes. Tome 30, 1928, n°2. p. 165

    P. Cloché, La civilisation athénienne (Collection Colin, n° 98), 1927

    No full text
    Mathieu Georges. P. Cloché, La civilisation athénienne (Collection Colin, n° 98), 1927. In: Revue des Études Anciennes. Tome 30, 1928, n°2. p. 165

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Collaborative performance-making in context

    No full text
    ‘Collaboration in the arts’, according to historian Charles Green (2001: x), became ‘a crucial element in the transition from modernist to postmodernist art’ and it continues to be a key component of creative processes in Western arts contexts. Although performative art forms can be seen to have an inherent collaborative aspect, it is only recently that an emphasis has been placed on problematizing processes of co-labouring in the disciplines of the performing arts. The recognition and exploration of creativity as ‘social’ and frequently ‘an explicitly collaborative endeavour’ has opened new avenues for research across diverse disciplines in the early twenty-first century (Littleton and Miell, 2004: 1). With specific reference to the performing arts, Kathryn Syssoyeva (2013: 2) similarly suggests that scholarly interest in ‘collective creation’ has only recently gathered pace. This collection of writing contributes to this growing area of scholarly interest in its examination of the role and place of collaboration in contemporary performance-making. Critically evaluating issues around the politics and ethics of collaborative work, it foregrounds the notion of creativity in performance as ‘social’, presenting an analysis of both the social and cultural conditions and the artistic processes that shape contemporary collaboration
    corecore