1,720,959 research outputs found
Modèle bayésien semi-paramétrique, applications en positionnement de dose
No full textPhase I clinical trials is an area in which statisticians have much to contribute. For over 30 years, this field has benefited from increasing interest on the part of statisticians and clinicians alike and several methods have been proposed to manage the sequential inclusion of patients to a study. The main purpose is to evaluate the occurrence of dose limiting toxicities for a selected group of patients with, typically, life threatening disease. The goal is to maximize the potential for therapeutic success in a situation where toxic side effects are inevitable and increase with increasing dose. From a range of given doses, we aim to determine the dose with a rate of toxicity as close as possible to some threshold chosen by the investigators. This dose is called the MTD (maximum tolerated dose). The standard situation is where we have a finite range of doses ordered with respect to the probability of toxicity at each dose. In this thesis we introduce a very general approach to modeling the problem - SPM (semi-parametric methods) - and these include a large class of methods. The viewpoint of SPM allows us to see things in, arguably, more relevant terms and to provide answers to questions such as asymptotic behavior. What kind of behavior should we be aiming for? For instance, can we consistently estimate the MTD? How, and under which conditions? Different parametrizations of SPM are considered and studied theoretically and via simulations. The obtained performances are comparable, and often better, to those of currently established methods. We extend the findings to the case of partial ordering in which more than one drug is under study and we do not necessarily know how all drug pairs are ordered. The SPM model structure leans on a hierarchical set-up whereby certain parameters are linearly constrained. The theoretical aspects of this structure are outlined for the case of distributions with discrete support. In this setting the great majority of laws can be easily considered and this enables us to avoid over restrictive specifications than can results in poor behavior.Les Phases I sont un domaine des essais cliniques dans lequel les statisticiens ont encore beaucoup à apporter. Depuis trente ans, ce secteur bénéficie d'un intérêt croissant et de nombreuses méthodes ont été proposées pour gérer l'allocation séquentielle des doses aux patients intégrés à l'étude. Durant cette Phase, il s'agit d'évaluer la toxicité, et s'adressant à des patients gravement atteints, il s'agit de maximiser les effets curatifs du traitement dont les retours toxiques sont une conséquence. Parmi une gamme de doses, on cherche à déterminer celle dont la probabilité de toxicité est la plus proche d'un seuil souhaité et fixé par les praticiens cliniques. Cette dose est appelée la MTD (maximum tolerated dose). La situation canonique dans laquelle sont introduites la plupart des méthodes consiste en une gamme de doses finie et ordonnée par probabilité de toxicité croissante. Dans cette thèse, on introduit une modélisation très générale du problème, la SPM (semi-parametric methods), qui recouvre une large classe de méthodes. Cela permet d'aborder des questions transversales aux Phases I. Quels sont les différents comportements asymptotiques souhaitables? La MTD peut-elle être localisée? Comment et dans quelles circonstances? Différentes paramétrisations de la SPM sont proposées et testées par simulations. Les performances obtenues sont comparables, voir supérieures à celles des méthodes les plus éprouvées. Les résultats théoriques sont étendus au cas spécifique de l'ordre partiel. La modélisation de la SPM repose sur un traitement hiérarchique inférentiel de modèles satisfaisant des contraintes linéaires de paramètres inconnus. Les aspects théoriques de cette structure sont décrits dans le cas de lois à supports discrets. Dans cette circonstance, de vastes ensembles de lois peuvent aisément être considérés, cela permettant d'éviter les cas de mauvaises spécifications
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Early-Phase Oncology Trials: Why So Many Designs?
No full textInternational audienceThe past 30 years have seen a considerable effort on the part of statisticians to improve the design and accuracy of early-phase oncology trials. Some of this effort has been rewarded via successful implementation in actual trials, yet it would be fair to say that among clinicians, there remains some reluctance to fully embrace more efficient model-based approaches. One reason for such reticence is the difficulty in understanding exactly what is being offered by more modern designs. Although it is generally accepted that these designs offer improvements over the old standard 3 + 3 design, a new question has then to be addressed: How should we decide among the new proposals which one is the best for our purpose? In this study, we recall 15 designs that are currently proposed and in use. We show that among these 15 designs, many are operationally identical. These 15 designs reduce to three broad classes of designs. This review helps summarize their properties and differences and highlights that certain designs require ad hoc modifications to ensure satisfactory performance
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
The role of minimal sets in dose finding studies
No full textIn view of the impossibility theorem of Azriel et al., the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), as currently defined in Phase I and Phase I/II trials, cannot be consistently estimated without making some very strong parametric assumptions. Experimentation carried out at a single dose will fail to provide a consistent estimator of the MTD. We require that information be obtained on a subset of the doses which we describe as the ‘minimal set’. We provide a definition of this set and study its role in semiparametric inference concerning the MTD. Focusing inference on the minimal set, and only indirectly on the MTD, has important consequences. Among these is consistency of estimators for both the minimal set and the MTD, in completely general conditions. Even when the goal is only to estimate the MTD, we do no worse, and often better than other methods and without making any sacrifice in terms of safety for the patient. © 2018, © American Statistical Association and Taylor & Francis 2018
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
