170 research outputs found
REALISME MAGIS DALAM NOVEL O KARYA EKA KURNIAWAN
Get PDFTujuan penelitian ini ialah mengetahui bentuk dari realisme magis pada novel O
dengan rumusan masalah bagaimana realisme magis dalam novel O karya Eka
Kurniawan. Metode yang digunakan ialah metode Close Reading dengan teknik
analisis isi melalui pendekatan postmodernisme. Metode close reading yang
digunakan hanya mengambil diksi-diksi dari kutipan yang membentuk realisme
magis dan tema-tema kecil, serta tema utama untuk menemukan pesan dalam
novel. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Jakarta, selama semester genap tahun
2016/2017. Penelitian ini difokuskan pada bentuk realisme magis dalam novel O.
Adapun subfokus penelitian ini ialah menganalisis realisme magis dengan lima
karakteristik yang dirumuskan oleh Wendy.B Faris. Untuk menganalisis
penelitian dibantu oleh tabel analisis lima karakteristik realisme magis dengan
kriteria analisis yang meliputi (1) irreducible element (elemen tak tereduksi), (2)
phenomenal world (dunia fenomenal), (3) unsettling doubt (keraguan yang
meresahkan), (4) merging realms (penggabungan dua dunia/wilayah) dan (5)
Disruption of time, space, and identity (gangguan waktu, ruang, dan identitas).
Berdasarkan hasil analisis menggunakan lima karakteristik realisme magis, novel
O karya Eka Kurniawan memenuhi lima karakteristik realisme magis dengan
karakteristik yang dominan adalah karakteristik phenomenal world (dunia
fenomenal). Hal ini didasari oleh permainan narasi oleh pengarang terhadap
peleburan hal fantasi dan realitas yang tidak ingin terlempar secara jauh ke dalam
sebuah realisme. Dari hasil analisis itulah terbentuk sebuah pesan secara implisit
mengenai hakikat hidup. Jadi, dapat dikatan lima karakteristik realisme magis
tersebut memiliki keterkaitan satu sama lain dalam mewujudkan bentuk dari
realisme magis pada novel yang dianalisis. (M.Y.M).
The purpose of this study is to know the form of magical realism in novel O with
the formulation of the problem is how the magical realism in the novel O by Eka
Kurniawan. The method used is the method of Close Reading with content
analysis techniques through postmodernism approach. The method of close
reading that is used only takes the dictions from the citation which forms magical
realism and small themes, as well as the main theme for finding the message in
the novel. This research was conducted in Jakarta, during the even semester of
2016/2017. This research is focused on the form of magical realism in novel O.
The subfokus of this research is to analyze the magical realism with five
characteristics formulated by Wendy.B Faris. To analyze the research is assisted
by the analysis table of the five characteristics of magical realism with the
analysis criteria that include (1) irreducible element, (2) phenomenal world, (3)
unsettling doubt, (4) merging realms, and (5) Disruption of time, space, and
identity. Based on the results of the analysis using the five characteristics of
magical realism, novel O works by Eka Kurniawan meet the five characteristics of
magical realism with the dominant characteristic is phenomenal world
characteristic. It is based on a narrative game by the author of the fusion of
fantasy and reality that does not want to be thrown into a realism. From the results
of that analysis formed an implicit message about the nature of life. Thus, the five
characteristics of magical realism are related to each other in realizing the form of
magical realism in the novel analyzed. (M.Y.M
Économie politique et Cultural studies
No full textMedia criticism in academia has long been riven by a notorious and enduring opposition between two approaches: political economy of communications and cultural studies. The hypothesis the author presents here, based on study of the limitations of the main attempts to integrate the two approaches, is that the point of contact between the two will also need to address the strategic issues raised by the neoliberalization and commodification of academia
From “Diversity” to “Discoverability”
No full textInternational audienceBased on an analysis of the scholarly literature as well as official reports commissioned by national and supranational institutions, this chapter critically examines the current semantic shifts from “Diversity” to “Discoverability” in the French-speaking world’s cultural policies. First, a genealogy of the emergence of “Diversity” shows how this notion ultimately tamed earlier critical themes such as Cultural Exceptionalism. Second, an examination of the different theoretical tools developed in order to measure diversity reveals how this notion maintains an ideal of democracy against standardization (although not always explicitly). Third, the analysis of the recent mutations in cultural policies (with the pregnancy of notions such as “consumed diversity” and “discoverability”) is linked to the rise of cultural platforms and their recommendation algorithms. Finally, a fourth part critically addresses the limits and internal theoretical and political contradictions of the propositions for cultural policy to which the category of “Discoverability” has given rise so far, especially the abandoning of issues of standardization
Industrie culturelle ou idéologie ?
No full textInternational audienceCet article propose de retracer les rapports entre production culturelle et idéologie dans la pensée adornienne au-delà du chapitre “Kulturindustrie” dans la dialectique de la raison. Il s’agit de retracer, depuis les premiers travaux sur la situation sociale de la musique et jusqu’aux développements plus tardifs de la Dialectique négative, en passant par les enquêtes américaines sur la culture de masse, les liens qu’Adorno établit entre le capitalisme comme mode de production, la réalité textuelle des productions culturelles et la construction des imaginaires et des subjectivités. Cette exploration révèle une pensée adornienne attachée à la notion marxienne de “fétichisme de la marchandise” qui a pour corollaire une interprétation des enjeux posés par la question de la valeur d’usage des marchandises qui s’éloigne de l’acception marxiste traditionnelle pour, néanmoins, mieux revenir à Marx
Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities
No full textAlthough it hasn’t much been considered as such, the Digital Humanities movements (or at least the most theoretically informed parts of it) offers a critique “from within” of the recent mutation of the higher education and research systems. This paper offers an analysis, from a Critical Theory perspective, of a key element of this critique: the theory vs. practice debate, which, in the Digital Humanities, is translated into the famous “hack” versus “yack” motto, where DHers usually call for the pre-eminence of the former over the latter. I show how this debate aims to criticize the social situation of employment in academia in the digital age and can further be interpreted with the Cultural industry theoretical concept, as a continuance of the domination of the intellectual labour (ie. yack in this case) over the manual labour (hack). Nevertheless, I argue that, pushing this debate to its very dialectical limit in the post-industrial academic labour situation, one realizes that the two terms aren’t in opposition anymore: the actual theory as well as the actual practice are below their very critical concepts in the academic labour. Therefore, I call for a reconfiguration of this debate, aiming at the rediscovering of an actual theory in the academic production, as well as a rediscovering of a praxis, the latter being outside of the scientific realm and rules: it is political
Économie politique et Cultural studies
No full textLe champ académique de la critique des médias connaît depuis longtemps une opposition célèbre et ancienne entre deux approches : l’économie politique de la communication et les cultural studies. L’hypothèse que l’auteur pose ici, après avoir étudié les limites des principales tentatives d’intégration des deux approches, est que l’articulation des deux doit aussi composer avec des enjeux stratégiques dans la libéralisation et la marchandisation du monde académique.Media criticism in academia has long been riven by a notorious and enduring opposition between two approaches: political economy of communications and cultural studies. The hypothesis the author presents here, based on study of the limitations of the main attempts to integrate the two approaches, is that the point of contact between the two will also need to address the strategic issues raised by the neoliberalization and commodification of academia.El campo académico de la crítica mediática ha experimentado durante mucho tiempo una famosa y antigua oposición entre dos enfoques: la economía política de la comunicación y los Cultural studies. La hipótesis que el autor del artículo presenta aquí, después de haber estudiado los límites de los principales intentos de integrar los dos enfoques, es que la articulación de los enfoques debe tratar cuestiones estratégicas en la liberación y mercantilización del mundo académico
Le travail intellectuel comme expérience oppositionnelle
Get PDF« Penser même est déjà un signe de résistance, un effort pour ne plus se laisser tromper. » Max Horkheimer, « L’État autoritaire » in Théorie critique. Les mouvements de contestation des dernières années ont contribué à reposer la question ancienne de la place des intellectuels dans les mobilisations sociales. Les deux dernières décennies ont ainsi été l’occasion de réinterroger le concept même d’intellectuel à travers les différents modes de l’engagement. Parmi de telles réinterrogations, bi..
- …
