1,721,041 research outputs found

    Center for Reproductive Rights

    No full text
    The Center for Reproductive Rights is a global human rights organization of lawyers and advocates who can apply their expertise and experience in human rights, comparative, and constitutional law across five continents. The Center is the only global legal advocacy organization dedicated to advancing reproductive rights as fundamental human rights around the world and envisions a world where every person participates with dignity as an equal member of society, regardless of gender; where every woman is free to decide whether or when to have children and whether to get married; where access to quality reproductive health care is guaranteed; and where every woman can make these decisions free from coercion or discrimination

    On All Fronts: 2021 Annual Report

    Full text link
    The Center for Reproductive Rights uses the power of law to advance reproductive rights as fundamental human rights around the world. We envision a world where every person participates with dignity as an equal member of society, regardless of gender; where every woman is free to decide whether or when to have children and whether to get married; where access to quality reproductive health care is guaranteed; and where every woman can make these decisions free from coercion or discrimination

    Climate Justice, Environmental Justice, and Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

    Full text link
    Climate change and environmental degradation are inextricably linked to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), resulting in detrimental impacts to individuals—especially those in vulnerable or marginalized populations.This position paper from the Center for Reproductive Rights highlights the intersections between climate justice, environmental justice, and SRHR and provides examples of the ways the Center is advancing legal and policy initiatives to address and create accountability for related SRHR violations

    Gender Justice in the Americas: A Transnational Dialogue on Violence, Sexuality, Reproduction, and Human Rights University

    No full text
    On February 23-25, 2011, over 100 women\u27s rights, gender, and sexuality advocates and scholars from twenty countries in North, South, and Central America and the Caribbean gathered at the University of Miami in Miami, Florida to attend a groundbreaking convening, Gender Justice in the Americas: A Transnational Dialogue on Violence, Sexuality, Reproduction, and Human Rights. The Convening, hosted by the University of Miami School of Law Human Rights Clinic, University of Diego Portales Human Rights Center, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute, brought together key players in the region to exchange views and discuss strategies to advance gender justice in the areas of violence against women, sexual and reproductive rights, socio-economic justice and women\u27s human rights. This Post-Conference Report provides a summary of the transnational conversation that took place over the course of this three-day event

    Gender Justice in the Americas: A Transnational Dialogue on Violence, Sexuality, Reproduction, and Human Rights University

    Full text link
    On February 23-25, 2011, over 100 women\u27s rights, gender, and sexuality advocates and scholars from twenty countries in North, South, and Central America and the Caribbean gathered at the University of Miami in Miami, Florida to attend a groundbreaking convening, Gender Justice in the Americas: A Transnational Dialogue on Violence, Sexuality, Reproduction, and Human Rights. The Convening, hosted by the University of Miami School of Law Human Rights Clinic, University of Diego Portales Human Rights Center, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute, brought together key players in the region to exchange views and discuss strategies to advance gender justice in the areas of violence against women, sexual and reproductive rights, socio-economic justice and women\u27s human rights. This Post-Conference Report provides a summary of the transnational conversation that took place over the course of this three-day event

    Reporte sobre Costa Rica, enviado para consideración del Comité de los Derechos del Niño y la Niña en su 83 periodo de sesiones.

    Full text link
    En esta carta, i) se ilustra la gravedad de la violencia sexual en contra de niñas y adolescentes en el país, la falta de acceso real a la anticoncepción oral de emergencia (AOE), y a la interrupción del embarazo en estos casos; y ii) llama la atención sobre otros temas de preocupación en relación a la salud sexual y reproductiva de niñas y adolescentes, relativos a la falta de información oficial en temas de salud sexual y reproductiva, y la falta de coordinación entre las autoridades a cargo de velar por la protección de las niñas y adolescentes en el país. Finalmente, incluye una lista de recomendaciones y preguntas

    HONDURAS. Center for reproductive rights and Center for Woman Rights -Comunicado- Denuncian a Honduras ante el Comité de Derechos Humanos de la ONU por prohibición absoluta de practicar abortos en el país.

    No full text
    HONDURAS. Center for reproductive rights and Center for Woman Rights -Comunicado- Denuncian  a Honduras ante el Comité de Derechos Humanos de la ONU por prohibición absoluta de practicar abortos en Honduras.  Fuente: www.reproductiverigths.or

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore