1,721,048 research outputs found

    Inventory of the Bilateral Agreements Linked to Readmission

    No full text
    The Inventory of the Bilateral Agreements Linked to Readmission was created in 2006. Since its inception, it has been updated on a monthly basis. In the parlance of the institutions of the European Union (EU), readmission refers to the expulsion of aliens who do not or longer have the right to stay on the territory of the EU. The online dataset contains more than 640 references to bilateral agreements linked to readmission (be they standard or not). Prior registration (including compliance with Terms of Use and Ethics Statement) is required to access the Inventory. The rationale for the Inventory lies in showing that the EU's readmission system has expanded while mobilizing today more than 125 countries worldwide, be they poor or rich, large or small, conflict-ridden or not, democratically organized or authoritarian. This is a powerfully inclusive system. To understand the scope of this system, it is important to analyze the drivers that have been conducive to its unprecedented geographical expansion and materialization. The analysis of such drivers lies at the intersection of various disciplines including political science, international relations, law, cognitive psychology, linguistics, and history. The field of investigation on the readmission system is huge and interdisciplinary research is much needed

    The pact on migration and asylum : turning the European territory into a non-territory?

    Full text link
    Published online: 04 March 2022Can a part of the territory of the European Union be turned into a “non-territory” where the fundamental rights of the migrants and asylum seekers to appeal and to remain in their destination country while their applications are examined, and the right for an individual assessment in line with international standards, are as it were contracted, owing to the very attributes of this “non-territory”? This article argues that the Pact on Migration and Asylum, in particular with the pre-entry screening and the new border procedures, subtly develops and consolidates policies and rules aimed at “deterritorializing” the territory of the EU while reinforcing its practices of externalization. Moreover, this unprecedented deterritorialization-externalization combination, in order to produce tangible policy results, presupposes the cooperation of third countries on expulsion and readmission, as well as more solidarity among the Member States. Having critically examined these two dimensions, the authors conclude that the new measures contained in the Pact might be conducive to the enhanced precarization of the legal positions of migrants and asylum seekers and to potential tensions with strategic third countries

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Return migrants to the Maghreb countries : reintegration and development challenges

    Full text link
    Collective Action to Support the Reintegration of Return Migrants in their Country of Origin (MIREM)This analytical report is aimed at furthering the dissemination of data analysed and collected in the framework of the MIREM Project (Return Migration to the Maghreb), or «Collective Action to Support the Reintegration of Return Migrants in their Country of Origin».The Mirem survey was made possible thanks to the financial support of the European Union and the European University Institute (EUI)

    Unbalanced Reciprocities: Cooperation on Readmission in the Euro-Mediterranean Area

    No full text
    This volume starts with a paradox. Over the last fifteen years or so, the number of bilateral readmission treaties concluded by the EU Member States with third countries has skyrocketed. This is quite extraordinary given the unbalanced reciprocities characterizing such treaties. Despite their being framed in a reciprocal context, readmission treaties incur asymmetric costs and benefits for the two contracting parties, particularly given they do not share the same interests in the removal of unauthorized aliens. With specific reference to the Euro-North African context, the authors set out to explain the cumulative factors and the overriding driving forces that have contributed to the growth and geographical expansion of the cobweb of bilateral agreements linked to readmission. They also highlight the gaps that may exist between reciprocal commitments and effective actions as well as between the drive for operability and the respect for human rights.Product of workshop No. 1 at the 9th MRM 2008Acknowledgement Abbreviations Chapter 1: Dealing with Unbalanced Reciprocities: Cooperation on Readmission and Implications, Jean-Pierre Cassarino Chapter 2: Readmission in the Relations between Italy and North African Mediterranean Countries, Paolo Cuttitta Chapter 3: Relations among Unequals? Readmission between Italy and Libya, Emanuela Paoletti Chapter 4: Italy and its Libyan Cooperation Program: Pioneer of the European Union’s Refugee Policy? Silja Klepp Bibliography Notes on contributorshttp://www.statewatch.org/news/2010/sep/eu-unbalanced-reciprocities-middle-east-institute.pd

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore