1,721,123 research outputs found
O legado conceitual da Teoria Histórico-Cultural no pensamento de Carl Ratner: entrevista ao laboratório de Psicologia Histórico-Cultural da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Get PDFO presente texto representa o trabalho de formação de protagonistas na Psicologia Histórico-Cultural. Este protagonismo se inicia com a formação de alunos do curso de Psicologia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá que participam do Laboratório de Psicologia Histórico-Cultural, um projeto de ensino e extensão, em que os professores coordenadores mobilizam ações formativas para os futuros profissionais. Com fundamentos no materialismo histórico-dialético, é proporcionado aos alunos processos de autogestão e desenvolvimento de ações em que a prática-teórica metodológica se faz presente. Nesse caminho, uma das ações que se sobressai é a administração do legado de conhecimentos produzidos por diferentes autores consagrados na Psicologia Histórico-Cultural mediante a produção de entrevistas sobre os caminhos produtivos desses autores. Este texto apresenta o resultado do trabalho teórico e conceitual produzido pelo prof. Carl Ratner, durante entrevista produzida e gerida pelos alunos do laboratório. Pretende-se, dessa forma, manter viva a produção e a memória desses grandes pensadores da teoria
Against the Luxury of Misunderstanding. Revisiting the Debate between Carl Ratner and Barbara Zielke on an Interview with Kenneth J. Gergen and his Theory of Social Constructionism
No full textIn our contribution we revisit the debate in FQS between Carl RATNER and Kenneth J. GERGEN—the latter also represented by Barbara ZIELKE. First we discuss the hidden premises of each position. Second we give a short introduction to both authors' versions of psychology that consequently result from these premises. In doing this their fundamental thinking about anthropology and human nature in general will arise, and the reader will understand why the debate is so emotional. In summing up, we propose an integrated kind of science that is characterized by a productive dialogue between the positions.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs060217
Contra el lujo de la confusión.Retomando el debate entre Carl Ratner y Barbara Zielke sobre una entrevista con Kenneth J. Gergen y su Teoría del Construccionismo Social
No full textCarl RATNERs und Kenneth J. GERGENs Debatte in Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS), letzterer vorwiegend vertreten durch Barbara ZIELKE, wird im vorliegenden Beitrag revisited. Ausgehend von der Diskussion der unausgesprochenen Prämissen beider Ansätze werden die jeweiligen Psychologien vorgestellt. Diese ergeben sich konsequent aus den bereits freigelegten Prämissen und zwangsläufig aus der inhärenten Fundamentalanthropologie. Im Anschluss daran wird ein integratives Wissenschaftsverständnis vorgeschlagen, welches über die emotional geführte und bisher weitgehend auf Anschuldigungen beruhende Debatte hinausgeht. Es wird für einen produktiven Dialog der durch GERGEN und RATNER vertretenen Wissenschaftsauffassungen plädiert und gleichzeitig skizziert, wie ein solcher gelingen kann. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602175In our contribution we revisit the debate in FQS between Carl RATNER and Kenneth J. GERGEN—the latter also represented by Barbara ZIELKE. First we discuss the hidden premises of each position. Second we give a short introduction to both authors' versions of psychology that consequently result from these premises. In doing this their fundamental thinking about anthropology and human nature in general will arise, and the reader will understand why the debate is so emotional. In summing up, we propose an integrated kind of science that is characterized by a productive dialogue between the positions. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602175En nuestra contribución retomamos el debate FQS entre Carl RATNER y Kenneth J. GERGEN – este último también representado por Barbara ZIELKE. Primero discutimos las premisas ocultas de cada posición. En segundo lugar, aportamos una pequeña introducción a las versiones de ambos autores sobre la psicología que, consecuentemente, resultan de esas premisas. Al hacer esto, surgirán sus pensamientos fundamentales acerca de la antropología y la naturaleza humana en general, y el lector comprenderá por qué el debate es tan emocional. En resumen, proponemos una forma integrada de ciencia que se caracteriza por un diálogo productivo entre las posiciones.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs060217
Walking tour: turismo, cultura e educação
Get PDFDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro Tecnológico. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção.Apresenta um olhar propondo o uso do Walking Tour (WT) como forma de preservação da história e do patrimônio de uma cidade, inserindo-o como uma ferramenta de motivação, consciência e conhecimento, em escolas, associações e grupos organizados, podendo dessa maneira estimular a identidade entre cidadão e cidade. O uso do WT como instrumento pedagógico aparece no trabalho como um eficaz recurso educacional do professor para despertar no aluno a curiosidade necessária acerca de sua cultura e sua cidade. O trabalho propõe ao mesmo tempo a utilização do WT no turismo cultural como argumento ao guia de turismo e como forma de gerar trabalho, divisas e melhorias para a economia local
Plädoyer gegen den Luxus des Missverstehens. Zur Debatte zwischen Carl Ratner und Barbara Zielke um den Sozialen Konstruktionismus Kenneth J. Gergens
No full textCarl RATNERs und Kenneth J. GERGENs Debatte in Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS), letzterer vorwiegend vertreten durch Barbara ZIELKE, wird im vorliegenden Beitrag revisited. Ausgehend von der Diskussion der unausgesprochenen Prämissen beider Ansätze werden die jeweiligen Psychologien vorgestellt. Diese ergeben sich konsequent aus den bereits freigelegten Prämissen und zwangsläufig aus der inhärenten Fundamentalanthropologie. Im Anschluss daran wird ein integratives Wissenschaftsverständnis vorgeschlagen, welches über die emotional geführte und bisher weitgehend auf Anschuldigungen beruhende Debatte hinausgeht. Es wird für einen produktiven Dialog der durch GERGEN und RATNER vertretenen Wissenschaftsauffassungen plädiert und gleichzeitig skizziert, wie ein solcher gelingen kann.In our contribution we revisit the debate in FQS between Carl RATNER and Kenneth J. GERGEN—the latter also represented by Barbara ZIELKE. First we discuss the hidden premises of each position. Second we give a short introduction to both authors' versions of psychology that consequently result from these premises. In doing this their fundamental thinking about anthropology and human nature in general will arise, and the reader will understand why the debate is so emotional. In summing up, we propose an integrated kind of science that is characterized by a productive dialogue between the positions.En nuestra contribución retomamos el debate FQS entre Carl RATNER y Kenneth J. GERGEN – este último también representado por Barbara ZIELKE. Primero discutimos las premisas ocultas de cada posición. En segundo lugar, aportamos una pequeña introducción a las versiones de ambos autores sobre la psicología que, consecuentemente, resultan de esas premisas. Al hacer esto, surgirán sus pensamientos fundamentales acerca de la antropología y la naturaleza humana en general, y el lector comprenderá por qué el debate es tan emocional. En resumen, proponemos una forma integrada de ciencia que se caracteriza por un diálogo productivo entre las posiciones
Mostly Music: Feb. 23, 2006
Get PDFCarl Ratner, Lori Simshttps://neiudc.neiu.edu/mostlymusic/1097/thumbnail.jp
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Mostly Music: Mar. 28, 2004
Get PDFCarl Ratner, Matthew Agnew, Jane Kenas-Hellerhttps://neiudc.neiu.edu/mostlymusic/1070/thumbnail.jp
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
