105,423 research outputs found

    Competing Ways Towards International Antitrust: the WTO versus the ICN

    No full text
    In times of globalization, trade liberalization and deregulation of specific industries, competition authorities face new challenges in order to protect national as well as international competition. With companies operating in various countries, fading market frontiers and increasing crossborder trade, new strategies must be developed in order to overcome threats to domestic markets resulting of anticompetitive behavior abroad. Even though solutions such as the “Effects Doctrine” or bilateral agreements allow – albeit imperfectly – countries to protect their domestic market, there are no laws safeguarding the global economy and international competition. Thus, the request arises to establish an international competition policy regime in order to harmonize countries’ competition laws, to reduce conflicts due to cross-border anti-competitive behavior and to support developing countries in reaching Western standards. Among several approaches, two are of significant interest: On the one hand, the World Trade Organization (WTO) could be enhanced by a board of supervision for international competition issues including a harmonized competition code for all, while on the other hand the International Competition Network (ICN) has been established to take care of global competition concerns through policy coordination [Graham 2003; Janow 2003; Budzinski 2004b]. This paper discusses whether the institutional WTO or the voluntary ICN approach represents the better path to an international competition policy regime to control private anticompetitive activities. The second part will explain the importance of an international competition policy. Subsequently, unilateral, bilateral and multilateral approaches to the prevention and solution of problems in global competition are introduced. Section 3.1 gives a short overview of the WTO’s characteristics, its structural organization and its plans to integrate an international competition policy. The organization and the framework of the ICN as well as its attempts to prevent international anticompetitive behavior is explored in section 3.2. Based on the statements made in section 2 and the facts presented in section 3, the fourth section compares the WTO approach with the ICN qualities. The discussion will be divided into the following six criteria: (i) feasibility, (ii) acceptability, (iii) efficiency, (iv) negotiation and implementation of international competition rules, (v) conflict resolution and (vi) adaptability. Conclusions follow in section 5.

    Devenir des micropolluants dans les traitements tertiaires

    No full text
    [Departement_IRSTEA]Ecotechnologies [TR1_IRSTEA]TED [Axe_IRSTEA]Co TED-SOWASTE et TED-EPURENational audienceZone humide artificielle : un outil d’épuration et de préservation du milieu Vendredi 11 octobre 2013 de 13 h 30 à 17 h LabEx COTE – Séminaire commun avec le LyRE Salle de conférence de l’ISM – Université Bordeaux 1, bât. A12, 3ème étage Est Programme : Le séminaire est animé par Hélène Budzinski (CNRS, UMR EPOC), co-directrice du LabEx COTE • 13 h 30 accueil des participants • 14 h Introduction : o Les micropolluants : enjeux pour l’épuration, Hélène Budzinski (CNRS, UMR EPOC) • Présentations : o Les traitements tertiaires disponibles : analyse comparée, Jean-Marc Choubert (Irstea – Centre de Lyon, UR MAEP) o Les zones artificielles humides, Eric Blin (Lyonnaise des eaux) o Le devenir des micropolluants o Relations nappe/rivière ou zone humide/nappe : des échanges complexes, Alain Dupuy (ENSEGID, EA Géoressources et Environnement) o Le point de vue d’une collectivité, Sabine Jeandenand (Syndicat intercommunal du Bassin d'Arcachon) o Les leviers socio-économiques • 16 h : Discussio

    Devenir des micropolluants dans les traitements tertiaires

    No full text
    [Departement_IRSTEA]Ecotechnologies [TR1_IRSTEA]TED [Axe_IRSTEA]Co TED-SOWASTE et TED-EPURENational audienceZone humide artificielle : un outil d’épuration et de préservation du milieu Vendredi 11 octobre 2013 de 13 h 30 à 17 h LabEx COTE – Séminaire commun avec le LyRE Salle de conférence de l’ISM – Université Bordeaux 1, bât. A12, 3ème étage Est Programme : Le séminaire est animé par Hélène Budzinski (CNRS, UMR EPOC), co-directrice du LabEx COTE • 13 h 30 accueil des participants • 14 h Introduction : o Les micropolluants : enjeux pour l’épuration, Hélène Budzinski (CNRS, UMR EPOC) • Présentations : o Les traitements tertiaires disponibles : analyse comparée, Jean-Marc Choubert (Irstea – Centre de Lyon, UR MAEP) o Les zones artificielles humides, Eric Blin (Lyonnaise des eaux) o Le devenir des micropolluants o Relations nappe/rivière ou zone humide/nappe : des échanges complexes, Alain Dupuy (ENSEGID, EA Géoressources et Environnement) o Le point de vue d’une collectivité, Sabine Jeandenand (Syndicat intercommunal du Bassin d'Arcachon) o Les leviers socio-économiques • 16 h : Discussio

    Devenir des micropolluants dans les traitements tertiaires

    No full text
    [Departement_IRSTEA]Ecotechnologies [TR1_IRSTEA]TED [Axe_IRSTEA]Co TED-SOWASTE et TED-EPURENational audienceZone humide artificielle : un outil d’épuration et de préservation du milieu Vendredi 11 octobre 2013 de 13 h 30 à 17 h LabEx COTE – Séminaire commun avec le LyRE Salle de conférence de l’ISM – Université Bordeaux 1, bât. A12, 3ème étage Est Programme : Le séminaire est animé par Hélène Budzinski (CNRS, UMR EPOC), co-directrice du LabEx COTE • 13 h 30 accueil des participants • 14 h Introduction : o Les micropolluants : enjeux pour l’épuration, Hélène Budzinski (CNRS, UMR EPOC) • Présentations : o Les traitements tertiaires disponibles : analyse comparée, Jean-Marc Choubert (Irstea – Centre de Lyon, UR MAEP) o Les zones artificielles humides, Eric Blin (Lyonnaise des eaux) o Le devenir des micropolluants o Relations nappe/rivière ou zone humide/nappe : des échanges complexes, Alain Dupuy (ENSEGID, EA Géoressources et Environnement) o Le point de vue d’une collectivité, Sabine Jeandenand (Syndicat intercommunal du Bassin d'Arcachon) o Les leviers socio-économiques • 16 h : Discussio

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    The construction of Karen Karnak: The multi-author-function

    No full text
    This thesis is situated within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia, and explores the mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture compared to that of a Read/Only tradition. The hypothesis of this study is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such, represents new functions and attributes, distinct from a more conventional concept of authorship, in which the roles of audience and author are more separate. Read/Write and participatory culture, as defined by this study, is focused on collaboration, and includes the influences of D.I.Y. culture, Open-Source practices and the production of text by multiple authors. Multi-authorship presents a re-thinking of several concepts which support the notion of the individual author, since the focus of multi-authorship is not on attribution and ownership of a finished text, but on the continued malleability of a text. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Alan Smithee and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, whilst concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names form an important context to this study, since primary research involves the construction of an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology and the interaction of thirty nine participants, who are invited to create a body of work under the collective pseudonym Karen Karnak. The data generated by this experiment is analysed using aspects of Michel Foucault's author-function to identify and determine power structures inherent in the WikiMedia context. The interplay of power structures, including concepts such as identity, ownership and the body of work, affect the resulting mode of authorship and contribute to the construction of Karen Karnak, suggesting further areas of research into the emerging multi-author

    The prohibition of the proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: how much economics in German merger control?

    No full text
    We review the Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel Office Germany) decision on the proposed merger between Springer and ProSiebenSat.1 from an economic point of view. In doing so, it is not our goal to analyse whether the controversial decision by the Bundeskar-tellamt has been correct or flawed from a legal point of view. Instead, we analyse whether the economic reasoning in the decision document reflects state-of-the-art economic theory on conglomerate mergers. Regarding such types of mergers, anticompetitive effects either do not occur regularly or are more often than not overcompensated by efficiency gains, so that a standard welfare perspective demands reluctance concerning antitrust interventions. This is particularly true if two-sided markets, like media markets, are involved. However, anticompe-titive conglomerate mergers are not impossible, in particular in neighbouring markets where there is some relationship between the products of the merging companies. In line with the more-economic approach in European merger control, a particular thorough line of argumen-tation, backed with particularly convincing economic evidence, is necessary to justify a pro-hibition of a conglomerate merger from an economic point of view. Against this background, we do not find the reasoning of the Bundeskartellamt entirely convincing and sufficiently strong to justify a prohibition of the proposed combination from an economic perspective. The reasons are that (i) the Bundeskartellamt fails to continuously consider consumer and customer welfare as the relevant standards, (ii) positive efficiency and welfare effects of cross-media strategies are neglected, (iii) in contrast, the competition agency sometimes ap-pears to view profitability of post-merger strategy options to be per se anticompetitive (effi-ciency offence), (iv) the incontestability of the relevant markets is not sufficiently substanti-ated, (v) inconsistencies occur regarding the symmetry of the TV advertising market duopoly versus the unique role of the BILD-Zeitung and (vi) the employment of modern economic instruments appears to be underdeveloped. Thus, we conclude that the Bundeskartellamt has not embraced the European more-economic approach in the analysed decision. However, one can discuss whether economic effects are overcompensated in this case by concerns about a reduction in diversity of opinion and threats to free speech. Similar to the Bundeskartellamt, we do not consider these concerns in our analysis. --merger control,media markets,more-economic approach,conglomerate mergers,cross-promotion

    Contribution of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Country’S H-Index

    No full text
    The aim of this study is to examine the effect of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) development on country’s scientific ranking as measured by H-index. Moreover, this study applies ICT development sub-indices including ICT Use, ICT Access and ICT skill to find the distinct effect of these sub-indices on country’s H-index. To this purpose, required data for the panel of 14 Middle East countries over the period 1995 to 2009 is collected. Findings of the current study show that ICT development increases the H-index of the sample countries. The results also indicate that ICT Use and ICT Skill sub-indices positively contribute to higher H-index but the effect of ICT access on country’s H-index is not clear
    corecore