1,720,957 research outputs found
Biblioteche e bibliotecari nel Wikiproject Covid-19: authority control, contenuti di qualità e linked open data
Full text linkStarting from the observation of the reaffirmed centrality that Wikipedia and its sister projects assumed during the Coronavirus pandemic and the lockdown, the article presents the Wikiproject Covid-19, in its dual articulation in Wikipedia and Wikidata. In particular, it analyzes the key role of librarians participating in the project, that they assume thanks to their knowledge in the LIS field and in the standardized description of resources through metadata. After a short international review, the paper reports the specific case of the University Library Center of the University of Salerno, where some librarians have actively contributed to the Wikidata Wikiproject Covid-19. Starting from the technical background acquired with participation in initiatives such as Wikicite or international campaigns such as “#1lib1ref” and from previous experiments, through the combined use of various tools and the creation of a rigorous workflow, the librarians have come to process and integrate thousands of data from Wikidata into quality biomedical databases in a relatively short time. The workflow focused mainly on three activities: the insertion of external unique identifiers for authors and scientific journals, the qualification of the items through the addition of bibliographic references and the subject cataloguing of the scientific articles relating to SARSCoV- 2 and the related world pandemic. Lastly the essay highlights the limits and the critical issues of the semantic web, of the open collaborative projects and of the specific method used, with some considerations on the librarian’s new centrality in the context of open data and on the need to participate in these projects in the in the area of Digital Humanities.Partendo dalla constatazione della riaffermata centralità che Wikipedia e i progetti fratelli hanno assunto durante la pandemia da coronavirus e il relativo lockdown, il contributo presenta il Wikiproject Covid-19, nella sua duplice articolazione in Wikipedia e in Wikidata. In particolare, si analizza il ruolo chiave della professionalità dei bibliotecari aderenti al progetto, che essi ricoprono grazie alle loro conoscenze in campo LIS e nella descrizione standardizzata delle risorse attraverso i metadati. Dopo una breve rassegna internazionale, si riporta il caso specifico del Centro bibliotecario di ateneo dell’Università degli studi di Salerno, dove alcune bibliotecarie hanno contribuito attivamente al Wikidata Wikiproject Covid-19. Partendo dal background tecnico acquisito con la partecipazione a iniziative come Wikicite o a campagne internazionali come “#1lib1ref” e dalle sperimentazioni pregresse, attraverso l’impiego combinato di vari tool e l’ideazione di un rigoroso flusso di lavoro, le bibliotecarie sono arrivate a processare e integrare in Wikidata migliaia di dati provenienti da database di qualità di ambito biomedico in un tempo relativamente breve. Il workflowsi è concentrato principalmente su tre attività: l’inserimento di identificatori univoci esterni ad autori e riviste scientifiche, la qualificazione degli item attraverso l’aggiunta di riferimenti bibliografici e la soggettazione degli articoli scientifici relativi al SARS-CoV-2 e alla relativa pandemia mondiale. Il saggio si conclude con l’evidenziazione di limiti e criticità del web semantico, dei progetti collaborativi aperti e del metodo specifico utilizzato, insieme a considerazioni sulla nuova centralità del bibliotecario nell’ambito degli open data e sulla necessità della partecipazione a tali progetti nell’ambito delle digital humanities
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
