105,535 research outputs found
R. R. Barbour letter to Warren G. Harding, February 14, 1921
No full textIn this letter dated February 14, 1921, R. R. Barbour writes to President-elect Warren G. Harding regarding a journalist named Frederick William Wile. Barbour urges Harding to avoid Wile, stating that he admits to engaging in English propaganda and is now on his way to St. Augustine, Florida, where Harding is.
This letter is part of the Warren G. Harding Papers (MSS 345). This collection includes correspondence, business records, and other materials documenting Harding’s business career as owner and editor-in-chief of The Daily Marion Star, as well as the various stages of his political career. A significant portion of the collection, and what’s available on Ohio Memory, highlights his 1920 presidential campaign, spanning just before publicly announcing his candidacy to handily defeating Ohio Governor James M. Cox in the election. Correspondents include both Ohio and national businessmen, political figures, and ordinary citizens writing with questions, support, congratulatory notes, and campaign advice. Some of the most interesting insights into the tumultuous political climate in the U.S., the extreme factionalism within the Republican Party in Ohio, and Harding’s campaign strategies are described in letters between Harding and his campaign manager, Harry M. Daugherty. Some of the topics addressed include women’s suffrage, Prohibition, the League of Nations, African American representation and issues, and lingering peace negotiations following World War I
William G. Barbour
No full textWilliam G. Barbour, a chip off the old block. Barbour is shown laying bricks.https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_startelegram1950s/13443/thumbnail.jp
Letter from G. W. Barbour to E. D. Keyes, 1851
No full textLetter informs Keyes that Barbour will dispense military escort for support and expresses gratitude
Letter from G. W. Barbour to M. Fillmore, 1852
No full textBarbour submits his resignation from the Office of Indian Agent to the President of the United States
Letter from Geo. Stanley to G. W. Barbour with application and license, 1851
No full textStanley of San Francisco's letter and application to Barbour for a license to trade with the Indian tribes on the San Joaquin River. Enclosed Barbour's approval in the end
Warren G. Harding letter to R. R. Barbour, February 20, 1921
No full textIn this letter dated February 20, 1921, President-elect Warren G. Harding writes to R. R. Barbour in response to his letter of February 14, in which Barbour warns Harding to avoid a journalist who writes for English propaganda. Harding notes that he does not regularly see the journalist, and thanks him for his note.
This letter is part of the Warren G. Harding Papers (MSS 345). This collection includes correspondence, business records, and other materials documenting Harding’s business career as owner and editor-in-chief of The Daily Marion Star, as well as the various stages of his political career. A significant portion of the collection, and what’s available on Ohio Memory, highlights his 1920 presidential campaign, spanning just before publicly announcing his candidacy to handily defeating Ohio Governor James M. Cox in the election. Correspondents include both Ohio and national businessmen, political figures, and ordinary citizens writing with questions, support, congratulatory notes, and campaign advice. Some of the most interesting insights into the tumultuous political climate in the U.S., the extreme factionalism within the Republican Party in Ohio, and Harding’s campaign strategies are described in letters between Harding and his campaign manager, Harry M. Daugherty. Some of the topics addressed include women’s suffrage, Prohibition, the League of Nations, African American representation and issues, and lingering peace negotiations following World War I
Letter from G. W. Barbour to Luke Lea with a treaty with 12 Indian tribes, 1851
No full textA letter to Luke Lea with a copy of a treaty made at Camp Belt, negotiated by G.W. Barbour on May 13, 1851 with 12 Indian tribes of Southern California
MEMBACA AYAT-AYAT AL-QURAN DENGAN PERSPEKTIF IAN G. BARBOUR
No full textAsbtract: This aticle aims to understand the science verses of the Quran with Ian G. Barbour perspective. To elaborate the problem, I used the qualitative research with hermeneutic analysis. There are three findings important in the research. Firstly, regarding the relation between religion and science Ian G. Barbour divided four typologies: conflict, independence, integration, and dialogue. Secondly, regarding to the Quran verses in the line with Barbour’s thought to be found that some possibilities the science explain the scientific verses of the Quran. Thirdly, with Barbour’s perspective it was found the fact that relation the Qur’an and the science were conflict, independence, and integration. Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ayat-ayat sains dengan perspektif Ian G. Barbour. Untuk menjelaskan masalah ini, saya menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan analisis hermeneutik. Adapun temuan yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah: Pertama, dalam mengemukan hubungan antara agama dan sains, Ian G. Barbour membagi ke dalam empat tipologi (konflik, independen, integrasi, dan dialog). Ia melihat bahwa keempat tipologi ini dijumpai di kalangan saintis dan agamawan. Kedua, Berkaitan dengan ayat-ayat al-Quran yang senada dengan pemikiran Ian G. Barbour memang ditemukan adanya kemungkinan sains menjelaskan ayat-ayat ilmiah dalam al-Quran. Ketiga, dengan perspektif Ian G. Barbour, ditemukan fakta bahwa relasi al-Quran dan sains berada pada tipologi konflik, independen, dan integratif. Konflik terjadi ketika sains berbicara tentang alam yang terbebas dari campur tangan Tuhan; independensi terjadi ketika berkaitan dengan teori evolusi Darwin. Namun, integrasi terjadi juga ketika sains mampu memecahkan informasi-informasi ilmiah yang disajikan al-Quran. Keywords: al-Quran, sains, dialog, integrasi, independen
Barbour, James G.
No full textMary E. Barbour - wifehttps://stars.library.ucf.edu/cfm-ch-memoranda-1938/1168/thumbnail.jp
Ciencia, filosofía del proceso y Dios en Ian G. Barbour
No full textEste artículo expone y discute el estudio realizado por lan G. Barbour en torno a la relación entre los modelos científicos y los modelos religiosos. No abarca, sin embargo, los estudios de Barbour sobre la repercusión de las nuevas tecnologías. La forma de pensar de Barbour concluye en la filosofía/teología del proceso, inspirada en Whitehead. Los problemas de interpretación de esta filosofía del proceso y ante todo el modo de entender la kénosis divina y la auto limitación real de Dios en el mundo constituyen la discusión fundamental de este artículo
- …
