1,721,015 research outputs found

    Levi e l'analogia

    No full text
    Chimico e scrittore: lo sapevamo bene. Etologo e antropologo: ne sapevamo poco. I mestieri di Primo Levi sembrano così moltiplicarsi: felicemente e rigorosamente. E se considerati con una certa attenzione appaniono molto meno mestieri del prevedibile

    Pasolini

    No full text
    Uno studio complessivo sugli specifici rapporti intertestuali (e in senso lato culturali) tra l'opera di Pier Paolo Pasolini e quella di Goffredo Parise

    Gay

    No full text

    Distribution of Cataract Types in the Italian-American Case-control Study and at Surgery in the Parma Area

    No full text
    Purpose: To compare the distribution of cataract types at surgery with the distribution detected in an ophthalmology clinic-based case-control study in the same geographic area (Parma, Italy). Methods: The distribution of cataract type assessed according to the Lens Opacities Classification System I in 284 consecutive patients 45 years of age or older, who were admitted for cataract surgery to the Institute of Ophthalmology in Parma during 1994, was compared with the distribution assessed in 1008 participants in the Italian-American case-control study of age-related cataract in the Parma metropolitan area from 1987 to 1989. Results: Analysis of cataract distribution indicates in the surgical group, compared with the case-control population, a significant increase of nuclear (N) and posterior subcapsular (PSC) opacities (any), a reduction of pure forms of cortical and N cataracts, and a marked increase of mixed types of opacities with a simultaneous N and PSC component. Conclusion: Although cortical opacities are probably the most prevalent type of age-related lens change in the general population of Parma metropolitan area, the type of cataract most frequently responsible for the decision of patients to undergo cataract surgery is a mixed type of opacity with an N-PSC component

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore