33 research outputs found
Policymakers' perceptions of climate policy instruments
No full textData set title: “Policymakers' perceptions of climate policy instruments”
Project title: CLICCS – B2, WP3
Project duration: 10.2021-12.2025
Project participants: Prof. Grischa Perino, Prof. Kai-Uwe Schnapp, Dr. Johannes Jarke-Neuert, Dr. Anne Gerstenberg, Sarah Fenske, Ella Karnik Hinks
This research project was set up in order to further a better understanding of the goals, perceptions and preferences about specific climate policy instruments from those who help shape and implement them. For an extensive description of the data please refer to: 10.25592/uhhfdm.16313
Type of data: qualitative semi-structured interviews
Cases: European Union, Germany, France, Poland
Interview partners: policymakers
Timeframe: 2022-2023
Contents uploaded here:
Extensive data documentation document
Anonymized interview transcripts
Questionnaire
Codebook
Maxqda with all completed data analysi
Fantaisie Et Sonate pour le Clavecin ou Forte-Piano : dédiées À Madame Anne De Caverine à Moscva ; Oeuvre III / par Jean Guillaume Haessler
No full textFANTAISIE ET SONATE POUR LE CLAVECIN OU FORTE-PIANO : DÉDIÉES À MADAME ANNE DE CAVERINE À MOSCVA ; OEUVRE III / PAR JEAN GUILLAUME HAESSLER
Fantaisie Et Sonate pour le Clavecin ou Forte-Piano : dédiées À Madame Anne De Caverine à Moscva ; Oeuvre III / par Jean Guillaume Haessler (1)
Titelseite (1)
Fantasia (2)
Sonata (3
The role of elected politicians in donor-led social protection: Insights from Zambia
No full textElected politicians sit at the interface between the state and the citizens and play a critical role in shaping the social contract. This article presents rare insights into the participation of elected politicians in donor-led social protection policy processes in Africa. Taking the case of Zambia, it uncovers the assigned and de facto roles and perceptions of Members of Parliament (MPs) in social cash transfers policy processes. The analysis reveals the agency of MPs, despite intense efforts of donors to influence and control them. Specifically, it demonstrates that donors' advocacy and learning initiatives largely failed to influence their views and values of social justice which underpin state-society relations. Instead, MPs learned about the policy narratives of donors, enabling them to strategically employ those narratives to sustain donor relations. The article suggests that for donor-led social protection to modify state-society relations, MPs' active participation, full support, and deliberation are indispensable
Chiasmus Bibliography
No full textIntroduction
John W. Welch
In 1978, my colleagues and I completed our work on Chiasmus in Antiquity, which was published in 1981 by Gerstenberg Verlag in Hildesheim, Germany. That volume contained a bibliography generated mainly by Robert F. Smith. Over the past two decades, I have continued to collect bibliographical information on numerous books and articles that either speak about or make use of chiasmus. Those additional sources have been included here, expanding the earlier bibliography, in an effort to be as comprehensive as possible. These items are presented alphabetically by author, and again in four main categories. Brief annotations and a citation index have also been supplied.https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/1020/thumbnail.jp
Arbeitszeit in Deutschland: Länge, Lage, Flexibilität der Arbeitszeit und die Gesundheit der Beschäftigten
No full textBook review, Oliver Gerstenberg, Euroconstitutionalism and Its Discontents
No full textWhile discussing several issues, the book chooses as its main theme the role courts – specifically, those beyond the state – and judicial review have acquired in contemporary constitutionalism. To address the criticism concerning judicial imperialism, made by political constitutionalists against national experiences as well as against the CJEU and the ECtHR, the author highlights the positive features of the «democratic experimentalist conception» of constitutional adjudication. In G.’s words, «constitutional dialogue occurs around and through processes of judicial interpretation. Without claiming for themselves the final word, courts can exert a more indirect – forum-creative and agenda setting – role in the process of an ongoing clarification of the meaning of a right. In exerting this role, courts rely less on a pre-existing consensus, but a potential consensus is sufficient: courts can induce debate and deliberation that leads to consensus» (p. viii). An example is the ECJ and ECtHR case law, which is considered «able to constructively re-open and re-politicize controversies that are blocked at the national level, or which cannot be resolved at the domestic level» (pp. ix-x). Conclusively, G. registers the emergence of a Euroconstitutionalism beyond the state, which also fulfils «the project of radical (or deep) democracy
