28 research outputs found
Supplemental material for Relationship between preoperative patient-reported outcomes and hospital length of stay: a prospective cohort study of general surgery patients in Vancouver, Canada
No full textSupplemental Material for Relationship between preoperative patient-reported outcomes and hospital length of stay: a prospective cohort study of general surgery patients in Vancouver, Canada by Jason Sutherland, Guiping Liu, Trafford Crump, Matthew Bair and Ahmer Karimuddin in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy</p
Supplemental Material Case mix-based changes in health status: A prospective study of elective surgery patients in Vancouver, Canada
No full textSupplemental Material for Case mix-based changes in health status: A prospective study of elective surgery patients in Vancouver, Canada by Jason M Sutherland, R Trafford Crump, Ahmer A Karimuddin, Guiping Liu, Kevin Wing, Arif Janjua and Kathryn Isaac in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy</p
THE HISTORY OF THE KING'S JURISDICTION AND THE RIGHT OF THE KING'S AUTHORITY IN JUDGING (An Interpretation of the Origins of Civil and Criminal Cases)
No full textJudiciary in the Airlangga era was held by the king himself, and corporal punishment was only imposed by the king and on robbers and thieves. However, it also becomes a reality, justice in ancient times was also carried out by certain officials. In fact, in royal territorial law units, the head of the unit also carries out the judiciary based on customary law. Some of the results of research by Dutch experts on the existence of a separation of the judiciary during the kingdom era in Indonesia, such as the pradata court and the unified court. Pradata cases were tried or decided by the king himself while unified cases were tried by royal officials. Therefore, the author wants to examine why the king's court is different from the court of certain officials within the kingdom. So based on the results of this study, the Pradata case is a case that endangers the crown, security, and order of the kingdom, for example creating riots in the kingdom, committing murder, persecution, robbery, and others. Whereas Padu cases are cases concerning individual people's interests, for example, disputes between communities that cannot be reconciled amicably, then cases like these are tried by royal officials. The reason for distinguishing the king's court from the official court is because the cases handled by the king's court are urgent and threaten the stability and integrity of the kingdom so that the handling must be strictly enforced by the king himself. While the judiciary officials handle cases of community disputes and these cases do not threaten the existence of the kingdom, so the handling is less urgent so they are left to the officials
Penyaluran Zakat Kepada Pelajar Pondok Pesantren dalam Perspektif Fiqh Syafi’iyyah
No full textZakat is a certain type of property whose owner is required to distribute it to the mustahiq who have been determined by syara'. The determination of mustahiq or groups who are entitled to receive zakat has been determined in the Qur'an, namely faqir, poor, 'amil, mu'allaf, mukatab (slave), gharim, sabilillah, and ibn sabil. The phenomenon that occurs in some communities, especially in Aceh, is that zakat is also distributed to Islamic boarding school students or santri, while these students are not included in the group entitled to receive zakat as mentioned above. From this phenomenon, the author wants to know further the views of Syafi'iyyah fiqh regarding the distribution of zakat to students or students. This research is a qualitative research that is phenomenological in nature, in analyzing the data the researcher uses content analysis techniques. The results of the study show that Islamic boarding school students or santri can receive zakat if they are included in people who are entitled to receive zakat such as the indigent or poor. Because basically the student of knowledge is not entitled to receive zakat on behalf of the student of knowledge, but it is permissible to accept it if the claimant of knowledge is included in the mustahiq zakat. The seeker of knowledge cannot be categorized into sabilillah because sabilillah in syafi'iyah fiqh are people who take up arms in war because they defend Allah's religion
Wait lists and adult general surgery: is there a socioeconomic dimension in Canada?
No full textAbstract Background Little is known about whether patients’ socioeconomic status influences their access to elective general surgery in Canada. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between socioeconomic status and wait times for elective general surgery. Methods Analysis of prospectively recruited participants’ data. The setting was six hospitals in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, a geographically defined region that includes Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Participants had elective general surgery between October 2013 and April 2017, community dwelling, aged 19 years or older and could complete survey forms. The outcome measure was wait time, defined as the number of weeks between being registered for elective general surgery and surgery date. Results One thousand three hundred twenty elective general surgery participants were included in the study. The response rate among eligible patients was 53%. Regression analyses found no statistically significant association between patients’ wait time with SES, adjusting for health status, cancer status, surgical priority level, comorbidity burden and demographic characteristics. Participants with proven or suspected cancer status had shorter waits relative to participants waiting for surgery for benign conditions. Participants with at least one comorbidity tended to experience shorter waits of approximately 5 weeks (p < 0.01). Pre-operative pain or depression/anxiety were not associated with shorter wait times. Conclusions Although this study found no relationship between SES and surgical wait time for elective general surgeries in the study hospitals, patients in lower SES categories reported worse health when assigned to the surgical queue
Standardisasi Nafkah Istri: Studi Perbandingan Mazhab Maliki dan Mazhab Syafi’i
No full textThe standard of living for the wife that is obliged to be provided by the husband is not clearly defined in the Koran and the hadiths, thus requiring the scholars to perform ijtihad in determining the size of the wife's income. The results of the ulama's ijtihad regarding the size of the wife's income will differ along with the different methods of ijtihad and the argument used, so that it becomes ambiguous (obscure) for the community to understand the actual size of the living according to the opinion of certain schools of thought. Based on the description of the problem, it is necessary to have an in-depth study of the standardization of the wife's income, which the author limits according to the Maliki and Shafi'i school. In this study the authors used a qualitative research method with a normative approach. The results of the research of the Maliki school of wife's income were not determined by a certain size, but the wife's obligation to support her was according to the husband's income level and the level of the wife's needs, so the Maliki school did not see the wife's obligation to support the husband's rich or poor. While the Shafi'i school determines the level of the wife's income with two classifications, food and clothing are determined according to the husband's class of income, while the residence or house is determined according to the wife's family stratum and the wife's eligibility to live in. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the standardization of the wife's income is determined according to the ijtihad of different scholars according to the ijtihad method used.Standar nafkah istri yang wajib diberikan suami tidak ditentukan secara jelas dalam Alquran dan hadis, sehingga mengharuskan para ulama untuk berijtihad dalam menentukan ukuran nafkah istri tersebut. Hasil ijtihad para ulama tentang ukuran nafkah istri akan berbeda seiring dengan berbedanya metode ijtihad dan dalil yang digunakan, sehingga menjadi ambigu (kekaburan) bagi masyarakat untuk memahami ukuran nafkah yang sebenarnya menurut pendapat mazhab tertentu. Berdasarkan deskripsi permasalahan tersebut perlu ada sebuah kajian yang mendalam tentang standardisasi nafkah istri yang penulis batasi menurut mazhab Maliki dan Syafi’i. Dalam kajian ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum (comparative approach). Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa dalam mazhab Maliki nafkah istri tidak ditentukan ukuran tertentu namun kewajiban nafkah istri tersebut menurut kadar penghasilan suami dan kadar kebutuhan istri, jadi mazhab Maliki tidak melihat kewajiban nafkah istri tersebut kepada kaya atau miskinnya suami. Sementara mazhab Syafi‘i menentukan kadar nafkah istri dengan dua klasifikasi, untuk makanan dan pakaian ditentukan menurut kelas perhasilan suami, sementara untuk tempat tinggal atau rumah ditentukan sesuai dengan strata keluarga istri dan kelayakan istri untuk menetap di dalamnya. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa standardisasi nafkah istri ditentukan menurut ijtihad para ulama yang berbeda sesuai dengan metode ijtihad yang digunakan
Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) using item response theory reveals limitations and suggests revisions
No full textPsychometric validation of the Stoma-QOL questionnaire in a Canadian cross-sectional sample of colostomy and ileostomy patients
No full textEffects of radiation and surgery on function and quality of life (QOL) in rectal cancer patients
No full text
