1,741,982 research outputs found
The unfaithful’s «flight» to another love (Aristoph. Eccl. 895-899)
No full textThe author traces echoes from Sappho —fragments 121 and 130 V.— in Aristophanes’ Ecclesiazusae 895-899.No disponible
Grammar [899]
No full textGrammar.
This manuscript is now IO Islamic B10 in the India Office collections.
[metadata: Otto Loth, A Catalogue of the Arabic Manuscripts in the Library of the India Office, (volume 1), no. 899 here with further notations and hyperlinks].
899.
B 10. Size 11 in. by 7 in.; foll. 209. Five lines in a page.
A concise Grammar, entitled (fol.5v.) لبّ الالباب فى علم الاعراب . The author of it is not mentioned, but, according to the beginning, it appears to be identical with the work mentioned in Ḥ. Kh. v. 306, no. ١١۰۷٣. Ḥ. Kh. ascribes it first to Tâj al-dîn Isfrâ’inî, but quotes subsequently the contradictory statement of a commentary, in which the author is named SHAMS AL-DÎN ‘ABD AL-MUN’IM B. MUḤAMMAD BARKUMÎNÎ. The latter statement is more probable, as Ḥ. Kh. evidently confounds the present treatise with Isfarânî’s اللباب , before mentioned (no. 894). This would appear from his general description of the latter work ( و هو كتاب وجيز الخ , p. 303) , which in fact is taken from the preface of the present treatise. 1 The author of it cannot be later than the eighth century.
He dedicates his work to a Wazîr (صاحب ديوان الممالك ) , named Sham al-dîn. No other copy known.
The preface begins: الحمد لله الموجد من العدم ׳ المستأثر بالقدم ׳ و الصلوة .... و بعد فلمّا رايتُ بمصداقِ اتحافُ الملوك احدى الدولتين أن أُتحفَ حضرةً هى خيرةُ الجنان الخ , and the treatise commences (fol. 6): اللفظ الموضوع لمعنى مفرد هو الكلمة او مركّبٍ فيه الاسناد و هو الحكم المفيد باحد جزئيه على الآخر الكلام الخ.
Boldly written, with vowel-points added. Copious marginal notes. Dated A.H. 784.
Bîj. Libr., A.H. 1034.
Cat. 235, iv.
1 Hence arose the incongruities noticed by Flügel, Hdss. Wien, i. 173, note 4
Resolución Rectoral Nº 899/2013. Designar docente regular como profesor adjunto con dedicación parcial.
No full textFil: Rector (R). Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Río Negro, ArgentinaResolución Rectoral Nº 899/2013. Designar docente regular como profesor adjunto con dedicación parcial en un todo de acuerdo con el dictamen producido por el Jurado que entendió en el concurso de referencia ALV29 de la Sede Alto Valle y Valle Medio, para el área Biología, orientación Parasitología, a partir del 1º de febrero de 2014 y hasta el 31 de enero de 2018
Ice rafted debris count of sediment core PS69/899-2
No full textIce rafted debris count from sediment cores PS69/899-2, located in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean, covering the past 150,000 years, based on the age model described in Fripiat et al. (doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.983936)
Diatom bound nitrogen isotopes of sediment core PS69/899-2TC
No full textDiatom-bound nitrogen isotopes (d15N-db) from the trigger core PS69/899-2TC, located in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean. This proxy reflects past variations in the degree of nitrate consumption in surface waters of the Southern Ocean
Diatom species composition of sediment core PS69/899-2
No full textDiatom species composition from sediment cores PS69/899-2, located in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean, covering the past 150,000 years, based on the age model described in Fripiat et al. (doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.983936)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
