1,740,417 research outputs found
Rhetoric [859]
No full textRhetoric.
This manuscript is now IO Islamic 364 in the India Office collections.
[metadata: Otto Loth, A Catalogue of the Arabic Manuscripts in the Library of the India Office, (volume 1), no. 859 here with further notations and hyperlinks].
859.
364. Size 101/4 in. by 53/4 in.; foll. 326. Fifteen lines in a page.
Another copy of the same work.
Plainly written; the end in different hands. Numerous notes. Defects after foll. 20, 39, and 297.
The beginning soiled.
Seal of Iḳtidâr Khân, Nuṣrat Jang, etc., on the title-page.
Cf. Stewart's Catal. 118.
[Tippu.
R. Jserstein, Coronas-Palace, Prague, Telefon: 859
No full textR. JSERSTEIN, CORONAS-PALACE, PRAGUE, TELEFON: 859
R. Jserstein, Coronas-Palace, Prague, Telefon: 859 ( -
COUN 859 Family Counseling Techniques
No full textCourse syllabus for COUN 859 Family Counseling Technique
Laborers Local Union 859 strike
No full textLaborers Local Union 859 strikehttps://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_wdsmithphotography/11935/thumbnail.jp
Laborers Local Union 859 strike
No full textLaborers Local Union 859 strikehttps://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_wdsmithphotography/11936/thumbnail.jp
Mandurama photograph collection [859] [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an8526486-859
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
