1,721,309 research outputs found

    Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive Class I resin composite restorations

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 23478.PDF (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access

    <b>Mechanical properties of laminated bamboo lumber N-finity according to ISO 23478-2022</b>

    No full text
    This research used the new ISO 23478-2022 standard as a reference for the calculation of mechanical properties of N-finity, and to understand the failure modes in compression. Previous studies have investigated the mechanical properties of laminated bamboo lumber (LBL), however no study has evaluated the mechanical properties of LBL according to the recently published ISO 23478-2022. The compression testing programme in parallel and perpendicular-to-grain directions were conducted. The measured elastic stiffness properties and compressive strengths show anisotropy with higher compressive strength and stiffness parallel-to-grain direction as compared to those at the transversal directions. The observed failure modes at the parallel-to-grain direction exhibited a mixed mode failure, whereas perpendicular-to-grain directions exhibited failure with longitudinal splitting with crack propagation rupture. This finding can be quantified using Hills failure criterion principle to define the failure criterion and to estimate the Hill’s yield failure ratios.</p

    &#27721;&#35821;&#27700;&#24179;&#32771;&#35797;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#19982;&#32440;&#31508;&#32771;&#35797;&#21644;&#29616;&#22330;&#26426;&#32771;&#25104;&#32489;&#27604;&#36739;&#30740;&#31350; ——&#20197;&#21360;&#23612;&#27863;&#27700;&#32771;&#28857;&#20026;&#20363;

    Get PDF
    &#26032;&#20896;&#32954;&#28814;&#30123;&#24773;&#26399;&#38388;&#65292;&#27721;&#32771;&#22269;&#38469;&#23454;&#34892;HSK &#23621;&#23478;&#32593;&#32476;&#32771;&#35797;&#12290;2020 &#24180;5 &#26376;&#65292;&#21360;&#23612;&#27863;&#27700;HSK&#32771;&#28857;&#20063;&#24320;&#22987;&#20030;&#21150;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#12290;&#30446;&#21069;&#26377;&#20851;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#30340;&#30740;&#31350;&#36824;&#38750;&#24120;&#23569;&#65292;&#32780;&#32771;&#34385;&#21040;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#30340;&#20449;&#24230;&#65292;&#38656;&#35201;&#30740;&#31350;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#30340;&#25104;&#32489;&#65292;&#23588;&#20854;&#26159;&#19982;&#32440;&#31508;&#32771;&#35797;&#25104;&#32489;&#30340;&#27604;&#36739;&#12290;&#22240;&#20026;&#32440;&#31508;&#32771;&#35797;&#21644;&#29616;&#22330;&#26426;&#32771;&#24471;&#20998;&#20063;&#20986;&#29616;&#24046;&#24322;&#29616;&#35937;&#65292;&#22522;&#20110;&#19977;&#32773;&#26159;&#30446;&#21069;&#37319;&#29992;&#30340;&#32771;&#35797;&#24418;&#24335;&#65292;&#26412;&#30740;&#31350;&#23545;&#27863;&#27700;&#32771;&#28857;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#21644;&#32440;&#31508;&#32771;&#35797;&#20197;&#21450;&#29616;&#22330;&#26426;&#32771;&#25104;&#32489;&#36827;&#34892;&#27604;&#36739;&#12290;&#32479;&#35745;&#32467;&#26524;&#34920;&#31034;&#65292;HSK&#65288;&#19968;&#32423;&#65289;&#33267;&#65288;&#19977;&#32423;&#65289;&#32440;&#31508;&#32771;&#35797;&#21644;&#29616;&#22330;&#26426;&#32771;&#25104;&#32489;&#22522;&#26412;&#39640;&#20110;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#12290;&#30456;&#21453;&#65292;HSK&#65288;&#22235;&#32423;&#65289;&#33267;&#65288;&#20845;&#32423;&#65289;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#25104;&#32489;&#22522;&#26412;&#39640;&#20110;&#32440;&#31508;&#32771;&#35797;&#21644;&#29616;&#22330;&#26426;&#32771;&#12290;&#23621;&#23478;&#32771;&#35797;&#20449;&#24230;&#21463;&#20960;&#20010;&#22240;&#32032;&#30340;&#24433;&#21709;&#65292;&#21363;&#32771;&#35797;&#22320;&#28857;&#12289;&#32771;&#29983;&#32676;&#20307;&#12289;&#30417;&#25511;&#25928;&#21147;&#20197;&#21450;&#32771;&#35797;&#29615;&#22659;&#12290

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Characterizing the Rigidly Rotating Magnetosphere Stars HD 345439 and HD 23478

    Get PDF
    The SDSS III APOGEE survey recently identified two new σ Ori E type candidates, HD 345439 and HD 23478, which are a rare subset of rapidly rotating massive stars whose large (kGauss) magnetic fields confine circumstellar material around these systems. Our analysis of multi-epoch photometric observations of HD 345439 from the Kilodegree Extremely Little Telescope, Wide Angle Search for Planets, and ASAS surveys reveals the presence of a ~0.7701 day period in each data set, suggesting the system is among the faster known σ Ori E analogs. We also see clear evidence that the strength of Hα, H i Brackett series lines, and He i lines also vary on a ~0.7701 day period from our analysis of multi-epoch, multi-wavelength spectroscopic monitoring of the system from the APO 3.5 m telescope. We trace the evolution of select emission line profiles in the system, and observe coherent line profile variability in both optical and infrared H i lines, as expected for rigidly rotating magnetosphere stars. We also analyze the evolution of the H i Br-11 line strength and line profile in multi-epoch observations of HD 23478 from the SDSS-III APOGEE instrument. The observed periodic behavior is consistent with that recently reported by Sikora and collaborators in optical spectra

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore