1,720,966 research outputs found
Kultura sećanja u proznoj rumunskoj manjinskoj književnosti
Full text linkCilj ove doktorske disertacije predstavlja sagledavanje odnosa proznog stvaralaštva rumunske književnosti u Vojvodini i kulture sećanja, a samim tim i društva i identiteta, iz perspektive književne imagologije i teorija kulturnog pamćenja, te uz uvođenje drugih naučnih koncepata korisnih za tumačenje i razumevanje predložene teme.
Uz poglavlje u kome se predstavlja teorijsko-metodološki okvir rada, kao i osnovna istraživačka pitanja, u dva velika poglavlja predstavljeno je šest studija slučaja koje ilustruju socrealistički model pamćenja u knjževnosti, kao i model koji oscilira između tradicionalizma, modernizma i postmodernizma. Ovi modeli u sebi komprimuju, pre svega, prosvetiteljsku, etičku i estetsku funkciju književnosti. Analiziraju se reprezentativni prozni tekstovi, odnosno autoslike i heteroslike koje oni posreduju. Književno konstruisane slike, stereotipi i klišei se posmatraju u društveno-političkom i istorijskom kontekstu, u kontekstu žanra i književne tradicije, kao i u kontekstu samog proznog teksta. Rezultati govore o tradiciji konstruisanja pozitivnih autoslika, ali i slika u duhu „prelaznog stanja“ koje predstavljaju negativne autoslike o aspektima „nas“ koji treba da se promene. Slika o Drugom se uglavnom konstituiše kao „unutrašnji Drugi“, čijoj Drugosti može da se teži ili koja može da se odbacuje, pored etničkih, kulturno ili jezičkih Drugih. (Re)konstrukciju književnih autoslika i heteroslika prate dva potpoglavlja o recepciji književnosti o kojoj je reč, u kojima se književne istorije sagledane iz optike sećanja pokazuju kao sistemi koji doprinose formiranju i negovanju repozitorijuma kulturnog pamćenja.
Rad se zaokružuje zaključnim napomenama, kao i poglavljima vezanim za izvore, literaturu, transkripciju stranih imena i biografiju autorke.This doctoral dissertation examines relations between prose writings and cultural memory in Romanian literature in Vojvodina, as well as between society and identity. The analysis is being approached form the perspective of imagology and theories of cultural memory, which are presented in the first chapter, although other scientific concepts, useful for understanding of the proposed topic, have also been used.
The next two large chapters present six case studies illustrating socialist realism model of memory in Romanian literature in Vojvodina, and a model of memory that oscillates between traditionalism, modernism and postmodernism. These models, first of all, comprise didactic, ethical and aesthetical functions of literature. The two chapters analyse the representative prose writings, examining autoimages and heteroimages that are constructed in selected texts in Romanian literature in Vojvodina. Literary constructed images, stereotypes and clichés are analysed in the socio-political and historical context, in the context of genre and literary traditions, as well as in the context of a prose text in question. The results speak of the tradition in which the self-image can be constructed as a positive autoimage, as well as a negative autoimage that implies a certain "transition state" and represents those aspects of "us" that need to change. More than ethnic, cultural and linguistic Others, literary texts are dominated by the image of "inner Other", whose Otherness “we” long for, or we reject it. (Re)Construction of literary autoimages and heteroimages is followed by two subsections of the reception of literature in question. Literary histories viewed from the perspective of cultural memory, appear as systems that contribute to developing and nurturing repository of cultural memory.
The dissertation ends with concluding observations, and is followed by chapters related to sources, bibliography, the list of foreign names transcribed into Serbian, and author’s biography
Kultura sećanja u proznoj rumunskoj manjinskoj književnosti
No full textCilj ove doktorske disertacije predstavlja sagledavanje odnosa proznog stvaralaštva rumunske književnosti u Vojvodini i kulture sećanja, a samim tim i društva i identiteta, iz perspektive književne imagologije i teorija kulturnog pamćenja, te uz uvođenje drugih naučnih koncepata korisnih za tumačenje i razumevanje predložene teme.
Uz poglavlje u kome se predstavlja teorijsko-metodološki okvir rada, kao i osnovna istraživačka pitanja, u dva velika poglavlja predstavljeno je šest studija slučaja koje ilustruju socrealistički model pamćenja u knjževnosti, kao i model koji oscilira između tradicionalizma, modernizma i postmodernizma. Ovi modeli u sebi komprimuju, pre svega, prosvetiteljsku, etičku i estetsku funkciju književnosti. Analiziraju se reprezentativni prozni tekstovi, odnosno autoslike i heteroslike koje oni posreduju. Književno konstruisane slike, stereotipi i klišei se posmatraju u društveno-političkom i istorijskom kontekstu, u kontekstu žanra i književne tradicije, kao i u kontekstu samog proznog teksta. Rezultati govore o tradiciji konstruisanja pozitivnih autoslika, ali i slika u duhu „prelaznog stanja“ koje predstavljaju negativne autoslike o aspektima „nas“ koji treba da se promene. Slika o Drugom se uglavnom konstituiše kao „unutrašnji Drugi“, čijoj Drugosti može da se teži ili koja može da se odbacuje, pored etničkih, kulturno ili jezičkih Drugih. (Re)konstrukciju književnih autoslika i heteroslika prate dva potpoglavlja o recepciji književnosti o kojoj je reč, u kojima se književne istorije sagledane iz optike sećanja pokazuju kao sistemi koji doprinose formiranju i negovanju repozitorijuma kulturnog pamćenja.
Rad se zaokružuje zaključnim napomenama, kao i poglavljima vezanim za izvore, literaturu, transkripciju stranih imena i biografiju autorke.This doctoral dissertation examines relations between prose writings and cultural memory in Romanian literature in Vojvodina, as well as between society and identity. The analysis is being approached form the perspective of imagology and theories of cultural memory, which are presented in the first chapter, although other scientific concepts, useful for understanding of the proposed topic, have also been used.
The next two large chapters present six case studies illustrating socialist realism model of memory in Romanian literature in Vojvodina, and a model of memory that oscillates between traditionalism, modernism and postmodernism. These models, first of all, comprise didactic, ethical and aesthetical functions of literature. The two chapters analyse the representative prose writings, examining autoimages and heteroimages that are constructed in selected texts in Romanian literature in Vojvodina. Literary constructed images, stereotypes and clichés are analysed in the socio-political and historical context, in the context of genre and literary traditions, as well as in the context of a prose text in question. The results speak of the tradition in which the self-image can be constructed as a positive autoimage, as well as a negative autoimage that implies a certain "transition state" and represents those aspects of "us" that need to change. More than ethnic, cultural and linguistic Others, literary texts are dominated by the image of "inner Other", whose Otherness “we” long for, or we reject it. (Re)Construction of literary autoimages and heteroimages is followed by two subsections of the reception of literature in question. Literary histories viewed from the perspective of cultural memory, appear as systems that contribute to developing and nurturing repository of cultural memory.
The dissertation ends with concluding observations, and is followed by chapters related to sources, bibliography, the list of foreign names transcribed into Serbian, and author’s biography
Kultura sećanja u proznoj rumunskoj manjinskoj književnosti
No full textCilj ove doktorske disertacije predstavlja sagledavanje odnosa proznog stvaralaštva rumunske književnosti u Vojvodini i kulture sećanja, a samim tim i društva i identiteta, iz perspektive književne imagologije i teorija kulturnog pamćenja, te uz uvođenje drugih naučnih koncepata korisnih za tumačenje i razumevanje predložene teme. Uz poglavlje u kome se predstavlja teorijsko-metodološki okvir rada, kao i osnovna istraživačka pitanja, u dva velika poglavlja predstavljeno je šest studija slučaja koje ilustruju socrealistički model pamćenja u knjževnosti, kao i model koji oscilira između tradicionalizma, modernizma i postmodernizma. Ovi modeli u sebi komprimuju, pre svega, prosvetiteljsku, etičku i estetsku funkciju književnosti. Analiziraju se reprezentativni prozni tekstovi, odnosno autoslike i heteroslike koje oni posreduju. Književno konstruisane slike, stereotipi i klišei se posmatraju u društveno-političkom i istorijskom kontekstu, u kontekstu žanra i književne tradicije, kao i u kontekstu samog proznog teksta. Rezultati govore o tradiciji konstruisanja pozitivnih autoslika, ali i slika u duhu „prelaznog stanja“ koje predstavljaju negativne autoslike o aspektima „nas“ koji treba da se promene. Slika o Drugom se uglavnom konstituiše kao „unutrašnji Drugi“, čijoj Drugosti može da se teži ili koja može da se odbacuje, pored etničkih, kulturno ili jezičkih Drugih. (Re)konstrukciju književnih autoslika i heteroslika prate dva potpoglavlja o recepciji književnosti o kojoj je reč, u kojima se književne istorije sagledane iz optike sećanja pokazuju kao sistemi koji doprinose formiranju i negovanju repozitorijuma kulturnog pamćenja. Rad se zaokružuje zaključnim napomenama, kao i poglavljima vezanim za izvore, literaturu, transkripciju stranih imena i biografiju autorke.This doctoral dissertation examines relations between prose writings and cultural memory in Romanian literature in Vojvodina, as well as between society and identity. The analysis is being approached form the perspective of imagology and theories of cultural memory, which are presented in the first chapter, although other scientific concepts, useful for understanding of the proposed topic, have also been used. The next two large chapters present six case studies illustrating socialist realism model of memory in Romanian literature in Vojvodina, and a model of memory that oscillates between traditionalism, modernism and postmodernism. These models, first of all, comprise didactic, ethical and aesthetical functions of literature. The two chapters analyse the representative prose writings, examining autoimages and heteroimages that are constructed in selected texts in Romanian literature in Vojvodina. Literary constructed images, stereotypes and clichés are analysed in the socio-political and historical context, in the context of genre and literary traditions, as well as in the context of a prose text in question. The results speak of the tradition in which the self-image can be constructed as a positive autoimage, as well as a negative autoimage that implies a certain "transition state" and represents those aspects of "us" that need to change. More than ethnic, cultural and linguistic Others, literary texts are dominated by the image of "inner Other", whose Otherness “we” long for, or we reject it. (Re)Construction of literary autoimages and heteroimages is followed by two subsections of the reception of literature in question. Literary histories viewed from the perspective of cultural memory, appear as systems that contribute to developing and nurturing repository of cultural memory. The dissertation ends with concluding observations, and is followed by chapters related to sources, bibliography, the list of foreign names transcribed into Serbian, and author’s biography
Vulnerable and Endangered Languages in Europe
No full textThis book offers a glimpse into the mosaic of Europe’s vulnerable and endangered languages, presenting several case studies from different regions. The languages and varieties in focus are Aromanian, Banat Bulgarian, Fiuman, Irish, Ladino, Romani, Sorbian, Sámi, Štivoroto and Vlach. Each chapter explores the unique challenges faced by these vulnerable and endangered languages and their speakers, highlighting diverse social, political, environmental and economic
factors contributing to their decline. Overall, the chapters paint a complex picture of the sociolinguistic situation in Europe, showing that the causes of endangerment are multifaceted and include social, environmental, political and economic factors. The languages discussed are often deeply intertwined with the identity and culture of marginalised or minority communities. While challenges to revitalisation are significant, there is potential for action, particularly in documentation and community engagement. The editors hope this volume will inspire further research, dialogue and action to protect and promote linguistic diversity
Istraživanje sociolingvističkog pejzaža ladino jezika u savremenoj Srbiji
No full textLadino, or Judeo-Spanish, the historical language of Sephardic Jews, faces severe endangerment globally and in Serbia, where intergenerational transmission has largely ceased. This chapter examines Ladino’s sociolinguistic status in Serbia through data collected via the “Vulnerable Languages and Linguistic Varieties in Serbia” (VLingS) project. The project aimed to assess the vulnerability of several minority languages in the Serbian context and included interviews with 14 Sephardic descendants. Findings reveal a generational decline in Ladino proficiency, with Serbian emerging as the dominant language. Nevertheless, Ladino holds symbolic and cultural importance as a marker of Sephardic heritage and identity. Respondents expressed positive attitudes toward the language, associating it with cultural memory and emotional connection, despite its active use being limited to specific domains such as music, ceremonial events, and familial expressions. The study emphasises that Ladino’s future lies in its postvernacular role, where it functions as a symbolic and cultural asset rather than a vernacular for daily communication. This transition should be facilitated by digital platforms, cultural revitalisation efforts, and educational initiatives that engage younger generations and foster global connections among dispersed Sephardic communities. Ladino’s status in Serbia underscores the evolving relationship between language and identity within multilingual, diasporic communities. Its preservation requires innovative approaches involving community members, cultural organisations, linguists, policymakers, and educators. These efforts should adapt to contemporary sociolinguistic realities while honouring Ladino’s historical and cultural significance.Ladino, ili judeo-španski, istorijski jezik sefardskih Jevreja, suočava se sa ozbiljnom ugroženošću širom sveta i u Srbiji, gde je međugeneracijsko prenošenje uglavnom prestalo. Ovo poglavlje ispituje sociolingvistički status ladina u Srbiji kroz podatke prikupljene putem projekta „Ranjivi jezici i jezičke varijetete u Srbiji“ (VLingS). Cilj projekta je bio da proceni ranjivost nekoliko manjinskih jezika u srpskom kontekstu i obuhvatio je intervjue sa 14 sefardskih potomaka. Rezultati otkrivaju generacijsko nazadovanje u poznavanju ladina, pri čemu se srpski pojavljuje kao dominantan jezik. Ipak, ladino ima simbolički i kulturni značaj kao obeležje sefardskog nasleđa i identiteta. Ispitanici su izrazili pozitivne stavove prema jeziku, povezujući ga sa kulturnim pamćenjem i emocionalnom vezom, uprkos tome što je njegova aktivna upotreba ograničena na određene oblasti kao što su muzika, ceremonijalni događaji i porodični izrazi. Studija naglašava da budućnost ladina leži u njegovoj postvernakularnoj ulozi, gde funkcioniše kao simboličko i kulturno dobro, a ne kao narodni jezik za svakodnevnu komunikaciju. Ovu tranziciju treba da olakšaju digitalne platforme, napori za kulturnu revitalizaciju i obrazovne inicijative koje angažuju mlađe generacije i podstiču globalne veze među raspršenim sefardskim zajednicama. Status ladina u Srbiji naglašava evoluirajući odnos između jezika i identiteta unutar višejezičnih, dijasporskih zajednica. Njegovo očuvanje zahteva inovativne pristupe koji uključuju članove zajednice, kulturne organizacije, lingviste, kreatore politike i edukatore. Ovi napori treba da se prilagode savremenim sociolingvističkim realnostima, uz poštovanje istorijskog i kulturnog značaja ladina
When Two Roma Communities Meet: Consequences for the Vulnerability of Romani in the Belgrade Suburb of Batajnica
No full textThis chapter explores language vulnerability in two Roma
communities residing in the Belgrade suburban settlement of Batajnica:
Sremski Roma and Arli Roma. These communities settled in the area at
different times; they speak different Romani dialects and belong to different
religious denominations. Based on the responses to the sociolinguistic
VLingS Questionnaire 1.0 conducted during fieldwork in 2023, the research
focuses on several sociolinguistic aspects, such as linguistic background,
intergenerational language transmission, attitudes toward Romani, issues
of identity and language maintenance, as well as various domains of
language usage. Although characterized by many similarities—particularly
in their linguistic backgrounds and attitudes toward language—the two
communities differ in the frequency of Romani language usage across
different domains. Notably, significantly more Arli Roma use their language
when speaking to their partners, children, and neighbours, discussing topics
of social interest, and, most importantly, during prayer and in gravestone
inscriptions. In contrast, Sremski Roma report more frequent usage of
Serbian across various domains, pointing to the potential vulnerability of
Romani in this community. These findings indicate that assessments of
language vulnerability and endangerment of Romani varieties should take
into account dialectal diversity and various extralinguistic factors, providing
separate estimates for distinct varieties.Поглавље истражује рањивост језика у двема ромским заједницама у београдском приградском насељу Батајница: у заједницама Сремских Рома и Арлија. Ове две заједнице настаниле су се у Батајници у различитим временским периодима, говоре различите ромске дијалекте и припадају различитим верским деноминацијама. Истраживање се заснива на одговорима саговорника на социолингвистички упитник VLingS Questionnaire 1.0 који је у датим заједницама спроведен током теренских истраживања 2023. Студија се фокусира на неколико социолингвистичких аспеката, као што су језички профил, међугенерацијско преношење језика, ставови према ромском, питања идентитета и очувања језика, као и различити домени употребе. Иако их одликују бројне сличности, посебно у језичком профилу и ставовима према језику, ове две заједнице разликују се у фреквенци употребе језика у различитим доменима. Значајно већи број Арлија употребљава ромски језик у разговору са својим партнерима, децом, комшијама, током разговора о друштвеним питањима, и нарочито током молитве и на надгробним натписима. С друге стране, Сремски Роми наводе чешћу употребу српског језика у различитим доменима, указујући на потенцијалну рањивост ромског у овој заједници. Добијени резултати сугеришу да процене рањивости и угрожености ромских варијетета треба да узму у обзир дијалекатску разноврсност и различите ванјезичке факторе, омогућавајући одвојене процене за различите варијетете
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Dativul posesiv românesc și problemele achiziției sale la studenții din Serbia: Un studiu preliminar
No full textStarting from a comparative perspective on Romanian and Serbian grammar, this paper deals with the acquisition and use of the Romanian possessive dative by students with L1 Serbian, who study Romanian as a foreign language. Various structural and functional differences between Romanian and Serbian account for the difficulties incurredby students when it comes to correctly producing the dative external possessive in Romanian. We propose a preliminary experimental study meant to analyze the degree and role of transfer in the acquisition of the structure, as well as the developmental differences between beginner, intermediate, advanced and heritage students.Starting from a comparative perspective on Romanian and Serbian grammar, this paper deals with the acquisition and use of the Romanian possessive dative by students with L1 Serbian, who study Romanian as a foreign language. Various structural and functional differences between Romanian and Serbian account for the difficulties incurredby students when it comes to correctly producing the dative external possessive in Romanian. We propose a preliminary experimental study meant to analyze the degree and role of transfer in the acquisition of the structure, as well as the developmental differences between beginner, intermediate, advanced and heritage students
- …
