Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Not a member yet
292 research outputs found
Sort by
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN PROBING-PROMPTING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model toward learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the mathematics anxiety. The learning models of this research were cooperative learning model of the GI with Scientific Approach, the cooperative learning model of the Probing-Prompting with Scientific Approach, and classical learning model with Scientific Approach. This was a quasi-experimental study with 3×3 factorical design. The study population was all eighth grade students of state junior high school in Karanganyar District. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling method. The sample consisted of 280 students with 95 students in the first experimental class, 93 students in the second experimental class, and 92 students in the control class. Instruments used to colled data were mathematics achievement test and the student’s mathematics anxiety questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: 1) GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach gave better achievement than probing-prompting with scientific approach and classical learning model with scientific approach while probing-prompting and classical learning model with scientific approach gave same achievement, 2) the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, and the students with moderate mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with high mathematics anxiety, 3) in all categories of student’s mathematics anxiety, GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach, Probing-Prompting cooperative learning model with scientific approach, and classical learning model with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, 4) in the GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach and Probing-Prompting cooperative learning model with scientific approach, the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, and the students with moderate mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with high mathematics anxiety. In the classical learning model with scientific approach, the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, while the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety had the same achievement.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Probing-Prompting, Classical Instruction, Scientific Approach, Mathematics Anxiety, Learning Achievement in Mathematics
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE, NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KONSEP DIRI
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student self concept. The learning model compared were Think Pair Share, Numbered Heads Together dan Problem Based Learning with saintific approach (TPS-S, NHT-S and PBL-S). This research was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3×3. The population of this research was all of students in grade VII of State Islam Junior High Schools of Magetan regency in academic year 2014/2015. The samples of the research consisted of 243 students and were gathered through stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments consisted of the test of learning achievement and self concept questionnaire. Hypotheses testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the results of hypotheses testing, it was concluded as follows. 1) Students with the cooperative learning model of the TPS-S, NHT-S and PBL-S learning model had the same mathematics achievement. 2) Students with high self concept had better mathematics achievement than students with medium and low self concept, students with medium self concept and low self concept have the same mathematics achievement. 3a) On the TPS-S learning model, students with high self concept had better mathematics achievement than students with low self concept, students with high self concept and medium self concept have the same mathematics achievement, students with medium self concept and low self concept have the same mathematics achievement. 3b) On the NHT-S and the PBL-S learning models, students mathematics achievement on each self concept categories had the same mathematics achievement. 4) On the each students self concept categories, students achievement on each learning model types had the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Problem Based Learning (PBL), Scientific Approach and Self Concept
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIVEMENT DIVISIONS DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN KETRAMPILAN KOMPUTASI MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of the Problem Based Learning (PBL), Teams Assisted Individualization (TAI), and Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) with the scientific approach viewed from students Adversity Quotient (AQ). The results of the research were as follows. (1) Students who were subjected to the PBL have a better understanding of concepts than students with the TAI while students were subjected to TAI have the same understanding of concepts as students who with STAD (2) Students who were subjected to the PBL have the same computing skills as students with the TAI, and TAI have the same computing skills as students with STAD, but students who were subjected to the PBL have better computing skills than students with STAD. (3) Students with high AQ have better conceptual understanding than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (4) Students with high AQ has better computing skills than students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have the same computing skills as low AQ. (5) In each of the learning model, students with high AQ have a better understanding of concepts than students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better understanding of concepts than low AQ. (6) In each of the learning model, students who have high AQ have better computing skills than students who have medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have the same computing skills equally as students who have low AQ. (7) In each AQ, students were subjected to the PBL have better understanding of concepts than students who were subjected to the TAI while students who were subjected to TAI have the same understanding of concept as with students who were subjected to the STAD. (8) In each AQ, students with the PBL have the same computing skills as students with TAI, students with TAI have the same computation skills as students of STAD, but students who were subjected to the PBL has the computing skills has better than students with STAD.Keywords : Learning model of PBL, TAI, STAD, scientific approach, Adversity Quotient (AQ), conceptual understanding, computation skill
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SURVEY, QUESTION, READ, RECITE, REVIEW (SQ3R) DAN SURVEY, QUESTION, READ, REFLECT, RECITE, REVIEW (SQ4R) DITINJAU DARI JENIS KELAMIN DAN GAYA BELAJAR
Get PDFAbstract: The aims of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from gender and the student learning styles. The learning models compared were SQ3R, SQ4R, and direct instruction. This was a quasi experimental research using 3x2x3 factorial designs. The hypotheses testing used three ways ANOVA with unbalance cell. This research concludes that: (1) SQ4R learning provided better mathematics learning achievement than SQ3R and direct instruction, while direct instruction provided better mathematics learning achievement than SQ3R; (2) girls had better mathematics learning achievement than boys; (3) the students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style, there was no difference in mathematics learning achievement; (4a) boys taught with SQ4R had better mathematics learning achievement than SQ3R and direct instruction, boys taught with SQ3R had mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instruction; (4b) girls taught with SQ4R and direct instruction had better mathematics learning achievement than SQ3R. Girls taught with SQ4R had mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instruction; (5a) the students with visual learning style who were taught SQ4R had better mathematics learning achievement than SQ3R. the students with visual learning style who were taught SQ4R had mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instruction, while students with visual learning style who were taught SQ3R provided mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instruction; (5b) the students with auditory learning style who were taught SQ4R had better mathematics learning achievement than SQ3R and direct instruction. Students with auditory learning style who were taught SQ3R had mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instruction; (5c) the students with kinesthetic learning style who were taught SQ4R had better mathematics learning achievement than SQ3R. Students with kinesthetic learning style who were taught SQ3R had mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instruction. Students with kinesthetic learning style who were taught SQ4R had mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instruction; (6) in the model of learning SQ3R, SQ4R, and direct instruction, not only boys but also girls with visual learning style had mathematics learning achievement as good as they with auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles.Keywords: SQ3R, SQ4R, Gender, Learning Style, Mathematics Learning Achievemen
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DAN TEAMS ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the student learning style. The learning models compared were TAPPS, TAI and classical with scientific approach. This research used the quasi experimental method. The population was the students of junior high school in Surakarta regency on academic year 2014/2015. The tecnique of taking sample was stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample was 291 students. The instruments used were examination test and learning styles test. The proposed hypothesis were analyzed using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions were as follows. 1) TAPPS with scientific approach have better mathematics achievement than TAI and classical with scientific approach, TAI and classical with scientific approach have the same achievement. 2) auditory students have better mathematics achievement than visual and kinesthetic students, visual and kinesthetic students have the same achievement. 3) In TAPPS with scientific approach, auditory students have better achievement than visual students, kinesthetic studentshave the same achievement as visual and auditory students. In TAI with scientific approach, auditory students have better achievement than visual and kinesthetic students, visual and kinesthetic students have the same achievement. In classical with scientific approach, auditory students have the same achievement as visual and kinesthetic students, visual students have better achievement than kinesthetic students. 4) In visual students, TAPPS with scientific approach have the same achievement as TAI and classical with scientific approach, classical with scientific approach have better achievement than TAI with scientific approach. In auditorial students, TAPPS and TAI with scientific approach have the same achievement, TAPPS and TAI with scientific approach have better achievement than classical with scientific approach. In kinesthetic students, TAI with scientific approach have the same achievement as TAPPS and classical with scientific approach, TAPPS with scientific approach have better achievement than classical with scientific approach.Key words: TAPPS, TAI, classical, scientific approach, learning styles, achievement of learning
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which one learning model that provide better mathematics learning achievement, TGT learning model, TPS learning model, or direct learning model, (2) which one category logical matematical intelligence of students that giving better mathematics learning achievement, high, medium, or low, (3) in each category logical matematical intelligence which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TGT learning model TPS learning model, or direct learning model. (4) in each learning models which one providing better mathematics learning achievement category self confidence high, medium, or low. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Junior High Schools in Surakarta Regency in the school year of 2015/2016. Population of this research was all VII graders of Junior High School of Surakarta. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 291 students: 96 students for experiment I class, 97 for experiment II class and 98 for control class. The instruments used for the data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the hypotheses, the results of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) The use of TGT resulted better achievement than that of TPS and direct learning model, the use of TPS resulted better achievement than that of direct learning model. (2) The students’ achievement who have high logical mathematical intelligence was better than those who have middle or low logical mathematical intelligence, and students who have middle logical mathematical intelligence were better than those who have low logical mathematic intelligence.Keywords: TGT,TPS, Direct Learning, and Logical Mathematical Intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DAN LEARNING CELL PADA ASPEK PENGETAHUAN DAN KETERAMPILAN SISWA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects in mathematics viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were NHT, Learning Cell and classical model with scientific approach. This research used the quasi experimental research method. This population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Pacitan regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 261 students, divided into three groups, namely: 88 students in Experimental Group 1, 86 students in Experimental Group 2, and 87 students in Control Group. The instruments of the research include test of learning achievement of the knowledge aspect, test of learning achievement of the skill aspect, and questionnaire of emotional quotient. The technique of analyze data used the two-way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: (1) the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than the classical learning model with scientific approach, and the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (2) the students with the high emotional quotient had a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than those with the moderate and low emotional quotient, and the students with the moderate and low emotional quotient had the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (3) in each learning model with scientific approach, the students with the high emotional quotient had a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than those with the moderate and low emotional quotient, and the students with the moderate and low emotional quotient had the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (4) in each of the emotional quotient, the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than the classical model with scientific approach, and the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects.Keywords: NHT, learning cell, classical, scientific approach, emotional quotient, knowledge, skill
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA SMP DI KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2014/2015
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of research were to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model of Numbered Heads Together (NHT) or Think Pair Share (TPS) type or clasical learning model. (2) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or low self-directed learning. (3) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model of Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Think Pair Share (TPS) type or clasical learning model, in each of self-directed learning. (4) which one better mathematics achievement among students who have high, medium, or low self-directed learning, on each learning models. This research was quasi experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Surakarta City. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 273 students: 96 students for the experiment I, 93 students for experiment II and 84 students for experiment III. The instruments used for collecting data were mathematics learning achievement test and student learning style questionnaire. Testing of hypothesis used unbalanced two-ways analysis of variance using significance level of α = 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, the conclusions were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of NHT type have better mathematics achievement than students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type and classical learning model. On the other side, students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type produced the same mathematics achievement as using classical learning model. (2) Students with high self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low self-directed learning, while students with medium self-directed learning produced the same mathematics achievement as with low self-directed learning. (3) In aech category high, medium and low self-directed learning, students who taught by cooperative learning model of NHT type have better mathematics achievement than students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type and classical learning model. On the other side, students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type have better mathematics achievement than classical learning model. (4) On each model of learning, cooperative learning model of NHT type, TPS type and classical learning model, students with high self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low self-directed learning, while students with medium self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with low self-directed learning.Keywords: Cooperative Learning of NHT, TPS, Self-Directed Learning, Mathematics Achievement
Analisis Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 pada Materi Pokok Peluang Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta
Get PDFAbstract: The aims of research was to describe the teacher understanding of 2013 curriculum-based learning process and assessment, learning process and assessment based on the 2013 curriculum in main subject of probability in classroom X SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta. This research used the qualitative method with the case study approach, by deeply studying the learning activities so as to describe the learning process taking place in the mathematics learning, especially the material of probability. The subject of research was mathematics teacher of the tenth grade of SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta with the criterion of having attended the training about 2013 curriculum. The data in this study were: (i) teacher’s understanding of the learning and assessment process based on 2013 curriculum (ii) mathematics learning process that imparting knowledge, attitudes, and skills with scientific approach (iii) the assessment process of knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Step analysis of the data in the study carried out in three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and withdrawal conclusion. The results of this study are as follows. (i) The learning process in curriculum 2013 was centered on the students, and the teacher merely functions as a facilitator. In addition, the learning process was not the only aspect of the knowledge imparted to students but the learning process in 2013 curriculum inculcate attitudes and skills aspects as well. According to teacher, assessment process using the aspects of knowledge, it can be a matter of testing and instrument description, aspects of attitude by observing and instrument in the form of sheets of observations, as well as aspects of skills with the practice tests or portfolios and instrument in the form of a rubric. (ii) Observed activities carried out by asking the students to listen to the explanation given by the teachers. The questioning activities carried out by asking questions to the students related to the material being studied. Information gathering activities that occur are students reading books and worksheets to answer the question or questions given by teacher. In this information gathering activities of teachers instill active attitude to the students. Inform process activities occur that students use information obtained from books and worksheets to answer the questions given by the teacher. On inform process activities, teachers inculcate cooperation and responsibility to the students. Communicated activities carried out by asking students to write the results of group discussions in class. (iii) Knowledge assessment process conducted by giving a quiz to the student at the end of learning and the instrument that is used in the form of a description. The attitude assessment process was carried out during the learning process. Teachers assess students attitudes to the observation technique. Skills assessment process were carried out during the learning process. Teachers assess students skills when communicating with the activities of the students and see the results of the discussion by looking at the results of the quiz given to students.Keywords : mathematics learning process, scientific approach, assessment process, curriculum 201
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAMS ASSITED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL DITINJAUDARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from students learning creativity. The learning models compared were TAI with contextual approach, NHT with contextual approach, and direct instruction with contextual approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Gemolong subdistrict. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMPN 1 Gemolong, SMPN 2 Gemolong, and SMP Muh 9 Gemolong. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and creativity questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TAI with contextual approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with contextual approach, TAI with contextual approach gives better mathematics achievement than direct instruction with contextual approach, NHT and direct instruction with contextual approach have the same mathematics achievement. (2) For students with high and medium learning creativity have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high and medium learning creativity was better than students who have low learning creativity. (3) For students who have high learning creativity, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have medium learning creativity, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement. (5) For students who have low learning creativity, TAI and NHT with contextual approach gives the same mathematics achievement. NHT and direct instruction with contextual approach gives the same mathematics achievement. TAI with contextual approach gives better mathematics achievement than direct instruction with contextual approach.Keywords: TAI, NHT, contextual approach, learning achievement, learning creativity