Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Not a member yet
292 research outputs found
Sort by
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING(PBL) DAN LEARNING CYCLE 5E DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI DI-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO
Get PDFAbstract: The research aims to know: 1) which learning model is better achievement LC 5E with scientific appraoach, PBL, or direct learning models : 2) the learning autonomy category giving a better achievement among the high, medium, and low level of learning autonomy; 3) the learning autonomy which yields a better achievement of each learning model ; and 4) learning model which yields a better achievement of each learning autonomy category. The type of the research is a quasi-experimental research. The research is carried out in Sukoharjo regency. The populations of research are all 10th students of in Sukoharjo regency in which school based curriculum applied in the academic year of 2014-2015. The sampling technique uses Stratified Cluster Random Sampling. The data collecting techniques use documents, questionnaires, and tests. The data analysis technique uses two-way variant analysis with unequal cells. The research concludes that; 1) the LC 5E learning model with scientific approach gives a better achievement in mathematics learning; 2) the students with high learning autonomy get better mathematics scores. The indicator is the average scores of students with high learning autonomy are better than those with low or medium level; 3) In each learning model, the students with high learning autonomy get better achievements than those with medium or low as well learning autonomy in general,whereas in high learning autonomy category, the LC 5E learning with scientific approach shows a better math achievement than PBL; and 4) For the classification of learning autonomy between the high level and the medium one, learning model LC 5E with scientific approach shows better achievement mathematics learning than the one with PBL or direct learning, whereas, the low learning autonomy has no different achivement LC 5E with scientific approach, PBL or the direct one.Keywords: Mathematics Learning Achievement, Learning Autonomy, Learning Mode
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DAN PAIRS CHECK DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015
Get PDFAbstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the knowledge and skill aspect viewed from adversity quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) with scientific approach, Pairs Check (PC) with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. This research was a quasi-experimental research. The population of the research was all of the eighth grade students of the State Junior High School in Sukoharjo. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics knowledge aspect test, mathematics skill aspect test and adversity quotient questionnaire. Technique of analyzing data that used was unbalanced two ways multivariat analysis of variance. From the research, it can be concluded that: (1) learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, (2) students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (3) on each learning model, students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (4) on each adversity quotient, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach.Keywords: cooperative learning model, NHT, PC, classical learning, scientific approach, knowledge aspect, skill aspect
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINKING ALOUD PAIR PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI SURAKARTA
Get PDFAbstract: The objectives of research were to find out: 1) which one is better learning achievement, scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, or scientific classical, 2) which one is better learning achievement, students with high, medium, or low AQ, 3) in each learning models, which one is better learning achievement, students with high, medium, or low AQ, 4) in each AQ level, which one is better learning achievement, scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, or scientific classical. This research was the quasi experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Surakarta. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that used were achievement test and Adversity Quotient (AQ) questionare. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the unbalanced two-way ANOVA. The results of this research were as follows. 1) Scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific TAPPS and scientific classical, while scientific TAPPS had better learning achievement than scientific classical. 2) The students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium and low AQ, while the students with medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. 3) In scientific NHT, the students with high, medium, and low AQ had the same learning achievement. In scientific TAPPS, the students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium AQ, while the students with high and medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. In scientific classical, the students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium and low AQ, while the students with medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. 4) At the students with high AQ, scientific NHT and scientific classical had the same learning achievement with scientific TAPPS, while scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific classical. At the students with medium AQ, scientific NHT had the same learning achievement with scientific TAPPS, while scientific NHT and scientific TAPPS had better learning achievement than scientific classical. At the student with low AQ, scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific TAPPS and scientific classical, while scientific TAPPS had the same learning achievement with scientific classical.Keywords: scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, scientific classical, Adversity Quotient (AQ), Achievemen
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN CONCEPT MAPS PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015
Get PDFusing PBL with concept maps (CM), PBL, or classical learning, (2) which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, student with high, medium, or low emotional intelligence (EI) types, (3) which one is more effective for each learning model, student with high, medium, or low EI types, (4) which one is more effective for each EI type of students, using PBL with CM, PBL, or classical learning. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in Sukoharjo Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample was 282 students. The data collection technique was the document that was national test in elementary school for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement test for mathematics student achievement data, and questionnaire of EI. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) Mathematics achievement using PBL with CM is better than using PBL or classical learning. Likewise, mathematics achievement using PBL is as same as using classical learning. (2) Students with high EI have mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low EI. Likewise, students with medium and low EI have the same as mathematics achievement. (3) For each learning model, students with high EI have mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low EI. Likewise, students with medium and low EI have the same as mathematics achievement. (4) For each EI type of students, mathematics achievement using PBL with CM is better than using PBL or classical learning. Likewise, mathematics achievement using PBL is as same as using classical learning.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, concept maps, and emotional intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI RELASI DAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VIII DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model toward learning outcomes in mathematics viewed from the reasoning ability. The learning models of this research were cooperative learning model of the GI with scientific, the cooperative learning model of the TPS with scientific, and the classical learning with scientific.This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 280 students. The instruments used to gather the data were test of learning outcomes in mathematics and test of reasoning ability. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The students instructed with GI with scientific had a better learning outcomes in mathematics than those instructed TPS with scientific and those instructed the classical learning with scientific. Furthermore, the students instructed TPS with scientific had a better learning outcomes in mathematics than those instructed the classical learning model with scientific. 2) The learning outcomes in mathematics of the students with the high and moderate reasoning ability had a better than that of the students with the low reasoning ability. In addition, the students with the high reasoning ability had the same learning outcomes in mathematics as the students with the moderate reasoning ability. 3) On model of the GI with scientific, the students with the high and low reasoning ability had the same learning outcomes in mathematics as the students with the moderate reasoning ability. Moreover, the students with the high reasoning ability had a better learning outcomes in mathematics than those the students with the low reasoning ability. On model of the TPS with scientific and the classical learning with scientific results in the same learning outcomes in each of reasoning ability. 4) The students with the high reasoning ability, GI with scientific and the classical learning with scientific results in the same learning outcomes in mathematics as TPS with scientific. Furthermore, GI with scientific results in a better learning outcomes in mathematics than the classical learning with scientific. The students with the moderate and low reasoning ability had the same learning outcomes in each of learning model.Keywords: GI with scientific, TPS with scientific, learning outcomes, reasoning ability
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI KESIAPAN BELAJAR DAN GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS XI IPA SMA N 3 SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The purposes of this research were: (1) knowing the characteristics of the misconception, and (2) knowing the causes of the misconception of the XI grade students in the academic year of 2013/2014 in equation of circle and equation of tangent line of a circle viewed from the student’s readiness and style of learning. Qualitative research was applied in this research. The subject of the research are students of the eleven grade of SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta. The source of data was taken from informants (students), documentation (questionnaire), and test. Data collection was taken by using interview, diagnostic test, and questionnaire. Data validity used the source of triangulation. Data analysis used Miles and Huberman’s concept that are data collection, data reduction, presenting the data, and drawing the conclusion. The result of the research showed as follows: (1) students who are ready to learn and have the synthetic thinking style in understanding the locus of a point on the circle and determining the equation of tangent line of a circle, experience a misconception of theoretical concept. Meanwhile, in determining the circle equation, the students who are ready to learn with synthetic thinking style, don’t have any misconception. (2) Students who are ready to study and have analytic thinking style in determining the equation of circle (determining the center point and the radius) experience a misconception in co relational concept. In understanding the locus of a point on the circle and determining the equation of tangent of line, students who are ready to study with analytical thinking style, experience a misconception in theoretical concept. (3) Students who are not ready to learn with synthetic thinking style experience a misconception in determining the equation of a circle (determining the center point and the radius), the misconception is in co relational and theoretical concept. In determining the equation of tangent line of a circle, students who are not ready with synthetic thinking style experience misconception of theoretical concept. While in understanding the locus of a point on the circle, generally students who not ready to learn with synthetic thinking style do not experience misconception. (4) Students who are not ready to learn with analytical thinking style experience misconception in determining the equation of circle (determining the center point and radius), namely the misconception of co relational and theoretical concepts. In determining the locus of a point on the circle, students who are not ready to learn with the analytical thinking style experience misconception of theoretical concept. (5) In general the cause of misconception for the students is the difficulty of the students to classify the form of the equation of the circle and the equation of tangent line of a circle.Keywords: misconception, readiness to learn, thinking styl
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD DENGAN AUTOGRAPH DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PERCAYA DIRI DAN KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP DI KABUPATEN MAGETAN TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014
Get PDFAbstract: The aim of this study was to determine and compare cooperative learning model of STAD by AutoGraph and STAD viewed of self-confidence and creativity. This study was a quasi experimental research with 2x2x2 factorial design. The population of this study was all students of junior high school in Magetan Regency in academic year 2012/2013. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random technique. The total of sample was 172 students, with details of 86 students for first experiment class and 86 students for second experiment class. The instruments used to collect data were test of prior knowledge in mathematics, self-confidence questionnaire, creativity questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The balance test of students prior knowledge in mathematics data used t-test and concluded that two of experimental classes have balance prior knowledge in mathematics. The testing of hypothesis used three-way analysis of variance with unballanced cell. The testing of hypothesis concluded as follows. (1) The students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by AutoGraph type have same mathematics achievement than students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type. (2) The students who have high self-confidence have better mathematics achievement than students who have low self-confidence. (3) Students who have high creativity have better mathematics achievement than students who have low creativity. (4) There was an interaction between learning model and self-confidence toward mathematics achievement. The students taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by AutoGraph type and who have high self-confidence have better mathematics achievement than the students who have low self-confidence. (5) There was no an interaction between learning model and creativity toward mathematics achievement. (6) There was no an interaction between self-confidence and creativity toward mathematics achievement. (7) There was an interaction between learning model, self-confidence and creativity toward mathematics achievement. The students taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type and who have low self-confidence and high creativity have better mathematics achievement than the students who have low creativity.Keyword: STAD by Autograph, STAD, Self-Confidence, Creativity, Mathematics Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP KELAS VIII DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR
Get PDF Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the learning style. The learning models compared were Numbered Heads Together, Problem Based Learning, and classical with saintific approach (NHT, PBL, Classical). This research was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3×3. The population of this research was all of students in second grade of Junior High Schools of Karanganyar regency in academic year 2014/2015. The samples of the research consisted of 245 students and were gathered through stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments consisted of pre test, test of learning achievement and learning style questionnaire. Hypotheses testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the results of hypotheses testing, it were concluded as follows. 1) NHT and PBL learning models gave the same mathematics achievement. Both learning models give a better mathematics learning achievement than classical model. 2) Students with visual and auditory learning style have better mathematics achievement than students with kinesthetic ones. On the other hand, students with visual and auditory learning style have equal mathematics learning achievement. 3) On all learning models, cooperative learning NHT type, problem based learning, and classical models, students with visual learning style have an equal mathematics learning achievement with auditory. Both learning style have a better mathematics learning achievement than kinesthetic ones, (4) On all visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style, cooperative learning with NHT type gives an equal mathematics learning achievement with PBL. Both learning models give a better mathematics learning achievement than classical model.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Problem Based Learning, learning style, Scientific Mathematics learning achievemen
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM POSING DAN PROBLEM SOLVING DENGAN PENDEKATAN PMR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO
Get PDFAbstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models with realistic mathematic education (RME) approach on learning achievement and mathematical communication ability viewed from student creativity. The learning models compared were Problem Posing (PP), Problem Solving (PS) and direct learning models. This research used a quasi-experimental research. The population were the seventh grade students of junior high school in Sukoharjo. The samples of this research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The proposed hypothesis of this research was analyzed by using the two way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows: (1) model of PP learning and model of PS learning with RME approach result the same achievement, but model of PP learning with RME approach results in a better mathematical communication ability than model of PS learning with RME. Model of PP learning and model of PS learning with RME approach result in better achievement and mathematical communication ability than direct learning model. (2) the students with the high creativity have better achievement and mathematical communication ability than those with the moderate or low creativity, but the students with the moderate and low creativity have the same achievement and mathematical communication ability. (3) in each creativities of students, model of PP learning and model of PS learning with RME approach result in better achievement and mathematical communication ability than direct learning model. Model of PP learning and model of PP learning with RME approach result the same achievement, but model of PP learning with RME approach results in a better mathematical communication ability than model of PS learning with RME. (4) in each learning models, the students with high creativity have better achievement and mathematical communication ability than those with medium and low creativity, and the students with moderate and low creativity have the same achievement and mathematical communication ability.Keywords: PP Learning, PS Learning, RME Approach, Direct Learning, Mathematical Communication Ability, Achievement, and Creativity of students
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRAN BELAJAR
Get PDFAbstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one gives better mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD), model Problem Based Learning (PBL), or model classical with scientific approach; (2) which one has better mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or low of self regulated learning; (3) for each learning model, which one has better mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or lowof self regulated learning; (4) For each category of self regulated learning, which one gives better mathematics achievement, STAD, PBL, or classical with scientific approach. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Surakarta City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMP N 2 Surakarta, SMP N 15 Surakarta and SMP N 24 Surakarta. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self regulated learning questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova. The conclusion were as follows. (1) PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than STAD with scientific approach, and STAD with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach have the same mathematics achievement. (2) Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have medium and low self regulated learning and students who have medium self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning (3) For STAD and PBL with scientific approach, students who have high and medium self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning. Students who have medium and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students who have high, medium, and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have high self regulated learning, STAD with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement with PBL and classical with scientific approach but PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For students who have medium and low self regulated learning, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Student Team Achievment Division (STAD), Problem Based Learning (PBL), classical, scientific approach, self regulated learning (SRL