Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Not a member yet
292 research outputs found
Sort by
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENDEKATAN OPEN-ENDED PADA POKOK BAHASAN LOGARITMA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BERPIKIR DAN KREATIVITAS PESERTA DIDIK KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN GUNUNG KIDUL TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013
Get PDFAbstract:The aim of the research was to determine and comparecooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach and STAD viewed from the thinking style and the creativity of toward learners student mathematics learning achievement.This research used the quasi-experimental research method with the factorial design of 2 x 2 x 2. Its population was all of the students in Grade X of State Senior Secondary Schools in Gunungkidul in Academic Year 2012/2013.Based on the results of the data analyses, the conclusions were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended resulted in a better learning achievement than the STAD type. 2) The students with the sequential thinking style have a better learning achievement than those with the random thinking style. 3) The students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the low creativity. 4)(a) In the sequential thinking style, the students treated to the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach have the same learning achievement as those treated with the STAD type; and (b) In the random thinking style, students treated to the cooperativelearning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach have a better learning achievement than those treated with the STAD type. 5)(a) in the high creativity, the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach results in a better learning achievement than that of the STAD type; and (b) in the low creativity, the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach results in the same learning achievement as that of the STAD type. 6) (a) In the high creativity, the students with the sequential thinking style have a better learning achievement than those with the random thinking style; (b) In the low creativity, the students with the sequential thinking style have the same learning achievement as those with the random thinking style; (c) in the sequential thinking style, the students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the low creativity; and (d) In the random thinking style, the students with the high creativity have the same learning achievement as those with the low creativity. 7) In the sequential thinking style with the high creativity and the low creativity and in the random thinking style with the low creativity, the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach results in the same learning achievement as that of the STAD type,and in the random thinking style with the high creativity, the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with theopen-ended approach results in a better learning achievement than thatof the STAD type.Keywords: Learning achievement in Mathematics, STAD, open-ended, thinking style, and creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD WITH GUIDED DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ)
Get PDFAbstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one is providing better mathematics learning achievement, students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, STAD or direct learning, (2) which one is having better mathematics learning achievement, students with Adversity Quotient (AQ) climbers, students with AQ campers or students with AQ quitters, (3) at each learning model, whether there are any mathematics learning achievement difference between students with AQ climbers, students with AQ campers or students with AQ quitters, (4) at each type of Adversity Quotient (AQ), whether there are any mathematics learning achievement difference between students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, STAD or direct learning. This research was a quasi experimental research using 3x3 factorial designs. The hypotheses testing used two ways ANOVA with unbalanced cell. This research concludes that: (1) students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with Guided Discovery Learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the students taught using STAD and direct instruction, as well as students who were taught using STAD have better mathematics learning achievement than the group of students taught using direct instruction, (2) students achievement with the climbers type of AQ were better than the students with the campers and quitters type of AQ while the students with the campers type of AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than the students with the quitters type of AQ, (3) in the cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, there was no difference in learning achievement in each type of AQ, in the STAD, there was no difference in learning achievement in each type of AQ, in the direct instruction, students with climbers type of AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than students with quitters type of AQ, (4) for the students who have climbers type of AQ, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning models, for the students who have campers type of AQ, STAD with guided discovery learning produced better mathematics achievement than direct instruction, for the students who have quitters type of AQ, STAD with guided discovery learning produced better mathematics achievement than direct instruction.Keywords: STAD With Guided Discovery Learning, Adversity Quotient, Mathematics Learning Achievemen