Jurnal Filsafat
Not a member yet
668 research outputs found
Sort by
EPISTEMOLOGI AL-FARABI: GAGASANNYA TENTANG DAYA-DAYA MANUSIA
The philosophy of al-Farabi is a review and commentary on the philosophical works written by Greek Philosophers. Al- Farabi’s thought exposes new nuance that is brought to the tradition of Islamic treasure. Al-Farabi carries both philosophy and religion discourses, primarily in matching the philosophy of language to the religion that was polarized into language terminologies. Religion is viewed as expression of philosophical truth in the popular language that uses art, logic, rhetoric, and poetry. Al-Farabi put rhetoric and poetry into the integral-part of philosophy. Poetry has ability in creating imagination (khayali) as a description of empirical data. The power of imagination is put into logic. This is an unusual construction of logic. By the power of imagination, al-Farabi confirmed the prophetic truth. Prophet is not only the owner of intellectual capability as philosopher has, but he has the high power of imagination; prophet is capable to formulate concrete formulation from abstract conceptions that is easily understood and accepted by society and his followers
REFLEKSI KRITIS ATAS METODE BERFILSAFAT DAMARDJATI SUPADJAR
The strength-ness of Damardjati Supadjar philosophical thought method is: unique, operational, and testified. Unique consist in that his thought are special and different from the other philosophers. The meaning of operational is applicable by one who ready to experience it. Testable has a meaning that someone who doing with the method, necessarily acknowledge that the method effective enough to developing the new consciousness. The weakness of the method are: style of the forwarding of ideas which sometime too vulgar (look-likes porno) and to the indigent beginner difficult to catch the substance of ideas, so that they impress the ideas less systematic. The contribution of Damardjati Supadjar method for the developing of philosophy, specially for Indonesian philosophy is to be able to offer the pattern of typical patterned thinking and attitude, representing result of cultural local genius of Java, Nusantara, Islam, And world culture
Notonagoro sebagai Homo Significans atas Ideologi Pancasila
Pancasila—as a representament, interpretant and object—facing a dillematic problem in connection to ideal and a utopiavalues that desired by the founding fathers and undesired activitiesin the real life. Pancasila—as an icon, index and symbol that oughtto give oportunity for other interpretation, so we do not fall into amonolitic interpretation that makes Pancasila become a trivialthing, as in New Era. The power of Pancasila does not lay at themeaning that gave by political elite all, but it depends on allcommunity involvement to belong to Pancasila as a glorioustreasure of Indonesian nation that open to spirit and developmentof the age. Notonagoro is a Pancasila homo significandum for hisattempt to reinterprate national ideology philosophically. He hasused substanstialistical analyzis with refer to the principle words ofeach principles (God, man, one, people, and justice) was anintelligent attempt to placed Pancasila in the abstract, general anduniversal meaning. His concept of Pancasila—abstract, general anduniversal—described the triadic of representament, object andinterpretant
GLOBALISASI DARI PERSPEKTIF KRITIS
By the end of the twentieth century the meaning of globalization were contested in every where. Not only in the economic or political debate, but it is also in the media. There are two major questions about globalization. Is that unavoided process or just an ideological project from the owner of social power in the world? Critical perspective said that world order not only as a product from the relations between one’s states to the others but also product from the relations between social powers in the world. Include at this point are material, ideological, and institutional power. And the world order formed by the configuration of it. So, in the critical perspective, globalization isn’t a natural or given reality, because any dominant actor in this project. And this actor uses their social power to directing where the globalization goes on. Unfortunatelly, no one’s (states) try to struggle from this condition. They just keep silent in this hegemonic process. The last question is how to solve this problem? And Antonio Gramsci said that war of position and war of maneuver are the ways to solve this problem
Perdebatan Seputar Theo, Cosmos, dan Anthropos dalam Filsafat Islam
Discussion of the Theo, Cosmos, and Antrophos are things thatvery interesting and always actuals in the long time and in tile wheres. The discussion of them were not held by Moslem ansich, but also Non Moslem. This paper reflects of that Theo, Cosmos, and Antrophos perspektif Phylosophy of Islamic. In other word, this paper explains some opinions of the Moslems phylosophys to Theo, Cosmos,ana Antrophos. The Moslems persons were taKen their opinions are: AI-Kindi, AI-Farabi, Ibnu Sina, and Ibnu Rusyd
PROGRAM RISET ILMIAH IMRE LAKATOS
The topic of this paper is related to the methodological thought of a philosopher Imre Lacatos. The methodological problem is a core problem in the area of philosophy of science. Science philosopher’s discourse shows the methodology of science as one of the scientific procedures in gaining the truth, but in fact, it caused the emergence of methodological mainstream; mono-methodology and pluri-methodology. Imre Lacatos’ tried to mediate the discourse of two fortifications by means of scientific research program. Some ideas developed by Lacatos’ in its relation to the scientific research programs are; first, Lacatos propose a sum of mathematics knowledge which is based on the heuristics idea, second, Lacatos’ criticism to Popper’s falsifiable concept, third, Lacatos’ effort in looking for a harmonious method that provides a sum of rational scientific progress, appropriately keeps its consistency with the historical fact, fourth, Lacatos’ connect the research program to scientists who protect the core of theory from falsification effort, fifth, a research program is qualified as progressive if it is signed by stunning novel facts and as deteriorative if the program is not directed to the new fact, sixth, the hard-core is determining characteristic of program, it is a general theory of hypotheses which is employed as a foundation of developed program, seventh, the negative heuristic of hard-core program is detailed program which states the basic assumption of program, eighth, the positive heuristic of hard-core program is an outline which indicates how the research program can be developed under additional assumption of new phenomenon clarification
Komunikasi, Legitimasi, dan Mediasi: Kritik atas Hegemoni Pemaknaan dalam Ruang Publik
The shoping of modern society tends to refuse my theological legitimation. This pattern leads the society face serious problems because every domain in human life hasdeveloped in autonomous basic legitimation. There is no systemwhich organizes rules to knowledge, science, ethics, politics, andlaws. Mass media as free market of ideologiea is a power whichdominates the significance of public sphere. This paper concernsin discussive the problem of communication as mediation ofmeaning in modern society. Based on an analysis ofcommunication aspects in modern society, we draw the prospectiveconclusion on which to build the future.
WELFARE STATE: LUMPUH SEKALIGUS MELUMPUHKAN
Welfare state on traditional or modern form still remain some weakness. On traditional form, welfare state’s emerge high burden on state budget. On the other hand, modern form of this idea was failure to finishing some classic problem— unemployment and poverty as such. This paper explores some critiques to welfare state ideas. And the most important thing is, welfare state paralysing individual’s autonomy for the sake of a reason which embodied as so called commodity: welfare
PENGANTAR
Jurnal Filsafat pada volume 16, Nomor 3, Desember 2006 ini memuat artikel-artikel dengan tema filsafat manusia. Perhatian manusia terhadap dirinya sendiri, dalam pemikiran filsafat, untuk pertama kalinya diserukan oleh Socrates, “gnoti seauton” katanya; “kenali dirimu sendiri”. Seruan Socrates ini menjadi bermakna ketika manusia asyik memperhatikan objek lain di luar dirinya (baca alam semesta); sehingga perhatian terhadap dirinya sendiri menjadi tidak memadai. Dalam konteks kekinian, ditengah kekaguman terhadap hal-hal di luar diri manusia (baca harta benda material, jabatan, ilmu, isme-isme, dan lain-lain), perhatian terhadap diri manusia menjadi penting. Akibat yang akan segera muncul ketika kekaguman dan perhatian yang berlebihan terhadap hal-hal di luar manusia melebihi perhatian terhadap diri manusia adalah semakin ter-alienasi-nya manusia dari dirinya sendiri. Ini berarti manusia menjadi “mandul” segala potensi tidak akan pernah aktual. Akhirnya, mudah-mudahan tema-tema tentang manusia dalam artikel-artikel Jurnal Filsafat ini mengingatkan kita untuk selalu sadar dir