University of Arts in Belgrade
Digital Repository of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of BelgradeNot a member yet
4571 research outputs found
Sort by
Audijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverena
No full textThe right of audience, in common law, is the right of a lawyer to represent a client in a court. Royalty, the Pope and some Presidents grant audi-ences. What does the power to grant an audience consist in? And what does it mean to demand an audience (with)? Through a reading of the way in which the vocabulary of theatre, acting and audience is involved in the generation of a theory of state by Hobbes and Rousseau, this paper looks to reopen these questions as a political resource for us to re-imagine and refigure our ways of being together. Through readings of Hobbes and Rousseau, it looks at the ways in which the performance of politics creates the public, the representative and the sovereign and the ways these figures interact. It proposes an alternative role for theatre as places of affective learning and a civic ethics of playfulness, in which the auto-institution of the state as an imagined collectivity is fully assumed.Pravo na saslušanje (audijenciju), u običajnom pravu, jeste pravo advokata da zastupa klijenta na sudu. Kralj, Papa i neki predsednici primaju u audijenciju. U čemu se sastoji moć primanja u audijenciju (to grant an audience)? I šta znači zahtevati audijenciju? Čitanjem načina na koji je vokabular pozoriša, glume i audijencije (publike) uključen u proizvodnju teorije države kod Hobsa i Rusoa ovaj rad propituje pitanje političkih resursa koji nam pomažu da iznova promislimo načine bivanja zajedno. Preko Hobsa i Rusoa, ovaj tekst ispituje na koji način performiranje politike stvara javnost, predstavnika i suverena, te na koji način ove figure interaguju. Predlaže se alternativna uloga za pozorište kao mesto afek-tivnog učenja i građanske etike razigranosti u kojoj se autoinstitucija države kao zamišljenog zajedništva obuhvata u celosti
Soviet-Yugoslav reconciliation as a basic for understanding Tito's role in Hungarian revolution of 1956.
No full textThis paper analyzes Soviet-Yugoslav relations in the context of the first
major crisis between the two countries that started in 1948. The focus
is on the period after Stalin’s death, which was followed by a period of
detente and reconciliation. This process was not without tensions because
the interests of the two countries were in opposition to one another. While
the Soviet leader, Nikita Khrushchev, wanted to return Yugoslavia to the
Soviet sphere of influence, Tito considered Yugoslav independence won
during the conflict with Stalin as his foreign policy priority. Due to these
circumstances, the Hungarian rebellion in the autumn of 1956 against the
Soviet occupation was the catalyst for further development of relations
between Yugoslavia and the USSR, and these relations are a necessary
frame of reference for understanding the politics of Yugoslavia during this
Hungarian crisis
Victims, media coverage and social context
No full textMedijsko prikazivanje žrtava nasilja, trauma, bolesti, siromaštva i katastrofa u globalnim okvirima zauzima značajan deo javnog informisanja i utiče na identitet svih aktera, aktivnih i pasivnih. Medijsko prikazivanje oblikuje razmišljanje i rasuđivanje na grupnom nivou, a uticaj tog prikazivanja doseže do solidarnosti u zajednici koja je kao nemonetarna forma društvenih interakcija pozicionirana na izvoru društvenog kapitala. Društveni kontekst medijskog izveštavanja o žrtvama oblikovan je kapacitetom društvenog sistema da žrtvu prepozna, prizna, osnaži i zaštiti. Kao aspekt tog kapaciteta, medijsko izveštavanje o žrtvama predstavlja indikator vidljivosti viktimizacije. Autorke u radu razmatraju prirodu fenomena medijskog izveštavanja o različitim oblicima viktimizacije i etičkim aspektima izveštavanja o žrtvama, sa ciljem da generišu doprinos kritičkoj analizi medijske prezentacije žrtava čiju svrhu određuje to što društveni akteri koriste društvenu organizaciju kako bi ostvarivali svoje interese.Media coverage of human suffering caused by trauma, illness, poverty and disasters worldwide takes up a significant part of media coverage and affects the identity of all actors, both active and passive. Media presentation shapes our thinking and reasoning at the group level, and has far reached impact. The social context of media reporting on victims is shaped by the capacity of the social system to recognize, acknowledge, strengthen and protect the victim. As an aspect of this capacity, media coverage of victims is an indicator of the victimization visibility. Authors discuss the nature of the media reporting as a phenomenon appearing in various forms as per given sources of victimization, and the ethical aspects of media presentation on victims in order to provide an analytic contribution that could be used to direct it in future
Transformacija kriminalnih organizacija kroz društveni konstrukt socijalnog banditizma
No full textBanditizam se konceptualno razume kao kršenje društvenih normi što zajednica odbacuje kao nedvosmisleno štetno i nastoji da eliminiše. Socijalni banditizam je fenomen čiji je pojam širi jer obuhvata i političku i ideološku dimenziju, a usmeren je na obezbeđivanje zaštite socijalnih interesa u najširem smislu tog izraza.
U izrazito podeljenim društvima u kojima postoje velike razlike teže je razdvojiti nasilni i organizovani kriminal od pobune, pogotovo što se ona često finansira kroz kriminalne aktivnosti. Takođe, nasilni kriminal ima tendenciju da opravdava svoje postupke pozivanjem na etničke, verske i klasne podele.
Određujući različite uzroke nastanka ovih fenomena u procesima diferencijacije, konfliktima, specifičnom okruženju i adaptaciji pripadnika društva van standardnih društvenih tokova, autorke u radu razmatraju određene analogije ovih fenomena. Cilj ovog rada je potpunije razumevanje bande kao kriminalnog fenomena koje se zasniva na određenju kompleksnog odnosa između pojedinaca, dinamike kolektivnog ponašanja i procesa društvenih promena.The concept of banditism can be determined as a form of breaking social norms, a way of harming society that triggers social reaction towards its elimination. Social banditism is a wider phenomenon, stretching over political and ideological spheres and it can be determined as an irregular form of securing protection of social interests in the broadest sense.
In extremely divided societies it can be difficult to separate violent, organised crime and rebellion because rebellion is often financed with criminal activities. Additionally, violent crime has a tendency to justify its actions by insisting on ethnic, religious and class divisions.
Authors of the article are examining certain analogies among the phenomena discussed here by determining processes of differentiation, conflicts, specific surrounding and adaptation of the society members. The aim of this paper is to contribute to a deeper understanding of gang as a criminal phenomenon that is rooted in complex relation between individuals, dynamics of collective behavior and process of social changes
Izvinjenje i praštanje kao mehanizmi otpornosti i kao faktor u restorativnom procesu
No full textRelaciju između individualnog i društvenog nivoa otpornosti moguće je sagledavati i kroz izvinjenje i praštanje kao faktora u iniciranju i oblikovanju restorativnog procesa. Razmatranje ključnih komponenti procesa izvinjenja i praštanja omogućava uvid u odnos između moralne i pravne utemeljenosti izvinjenja, u perspektivi interakcija između moralnih vrednosti koje dominiraju u zajednici i njenog pravnog sistema. Analizirajući proces izvinjenja i praštanja u okvirima individualne, socijalne i pravne komunikacije, autorke pronalaze argumente koji ukazuju na značaj ovog procesa za razvijanje otpornosti u okviru društvene i pravne prakse oslonjene na principe restorativne pravde. Cilj rada je da sugeriše da je na moralu zasnovana individualna otpornost jedan od faktora socijalne kompetencije.The relationship between the individual and social level of resilience can also be viewed via apology and forgiveness as a factor in the initiation and design of the restorative process. Reviewing the key components of the apology and forgiveness process provides an insight into the relationship between the moral and legal basis of apology, as outlined by the perspective of the interaction between moral values that dominate in the society and its legal system. Analyzing the process of apology and forgiveness in the framework of individual, social and legal communication, the authors find arguments that point to the significance of this process for developing resistance within the framework of social and legal practice relying on the principles of restorative justice. The aim of the paper is to suggest that individual resistance based on morality is one of the factors of social competence
Mедијска зависност: стари и нови медији
No full textTwo aspects of technologically driven civilization are evident:
availability of new media and interactivity. This study examines media
addiction on three levels: purpose of use, medium of choice and online
application utilized. Media addiction increases with those who use media
for fun as opposed to individuals who use media for information;
level of media addiction is higher with users of new media as opposed
to users of old media; more interactive and less practical online applications
such as social networks and chat are more addictive. When
looking into nature of new and old media it is possible to conclude that
media addiction may be related to number of senses grabbed by media
and media features, such as live broadcasting and interactivity. This
brings us to conclusion that future of media may be in employment of
additional human senses in its use
Classification of media addiction
No full textAppearance of social networks opened new realms of life simulation, potentially boosting media addictions. Because of appearance and widespread use of new media, there is a need to explore potential hazards of such activities, one of them being media addiction. In that way it may be significant to examine relationship of media addiction and stressful situations. This general issue relates to quality of life. Research results show stressful situations coming from family, workplace, education and moral and ethical norms are strongly linked to media addiction. Also, family as liberating agent has been found to correlate with decrease in levels of media addiction
Socijalne patologije, pogrešni pravci razvoja i heteronomija društvenog: društvena teorija i negativna strana priznanja
No full textThe aim of this paper is to explore a tension between two concepts
designed to expose social discomforts in Axel Honneth’s mature work, namely
social pathologies and anomie. Particular emphasis will be given to how they
contribute or obstruct Honneth’s apprehension of social tensions. In the first
session of this exposition I will show that Honneth’s interpretation of social
pathologies is based on a conception of society as an organic whole (I). While
this interpretation represents a slight change regarding Honneth’s understanding
of social pathologies in Das Recht der Freiheit, it does not change the fact that in
his work subsequent to that book the concept of false developments has not
been properly theorized. Accordingly, social discomforts related to deviations
from expected patterns of a normative reconstruction remain largely ignored.
This calls for a perspective more fully able to grasp the heteronomy of social life
(II). As a result, in Honneth’s mature work there seems to be a tension between
the aims of a normative reconstruction and those of social critique, mainly due
to an inability of the author to combine both elements of his social theory. In its
final section (III), the paper will address that tension in order to critically contribute
to Honneth’s attempt to link normative reconstruction, social analysis and criticism.Cilj ovog rada je da se istraži određena napetost između dve koncepcije koje služe za analizu društvenih napetosti u zrelim radovima Aksela Honeta, naime društvenih patologija i anomije. Naročita pažnja je posvećena pitanju kako ove koncepcije pospešuju odnosno ograničavaju Honetovo razumevanje društvenih
napetosti. U prvom delu rada pokazujem da Honetova interpretacija socijalnih
patologija počiva na koncepciji društva kao organske celine (I). Iako ova interpretacija predstavlja određenu promenu u Honetovom shvatanju socijalnih patologija u odnosu na Pravo slobode, to ne utiče na činjenicu da u radovima koji
nastaju nakon ove knjige koncepcija pogrešnih pravaca društvenog razvoja nije
adekvatno teorizovana. Shodno tome, društveni problemi koji se sastoje u odstupanjima u odnosu na očekivane obrasce normativne rekonstrukcije ostaju
neprimećeni. Ova činjenica upućuje na neophodnost perspektive koja bi mogla
u potpunosti da shvati heteronomiju društvenog života (II). Usled svega navedenog, u Honetovim zrelim radovima postoji napetost između ciljeva normativne rekonstrukcije i društvene kritike, uglavnom zbog toga što Honet ne uspeva da kombinuje oba aspekta svoje društvene teorije. U finalnom odeljku (III), rad razmatra ovu napetost sa ciljem da se da kritički doprinos Honetovom pokušaju da poveže normativnu rekonstrukciju, društvenu analizu i kritiku
Psihički život slobode: socijalna patologija i njeni simptomi
No full textThis paper discusses the relationship between Axel Honneth’s intersubjective theory of recognition and his political theory of democratic ethical life by addressing the potentials and difficulties attached to the notion of social pathology. Taking into account the diverse uses of this concept throughout Honneth’s oeuvre, it focuses initially on two of its formulations: first, the more recent discussions presented in “The Diseases of Society”, some of which can be read in continuity with arguments presented in
Freedom’s Right ; second, an implicit conception of social pathology that can be found in Struggle for Recognition. These formulations involve contrastingly different premises with regard to phenomenological, methodological, social-ontological and etiological matters. I argue that such differences can be better grasped if one bears in mind two
distinctive ways of understanding the fundamental intuition at the basis of the
notion of social pathology: either as an analogy or as a homology. By disclosing
the actual or potential discrepancies between both conceptions, the aim is to
outline the grounds on which they could be brought together within the framework
of a comprehensive concept. With this purpose, I then critically examine a third
conception of social pathology which was first presented in Suffering from
Indeterminacy and later developed, with some restrictions, in Freedom’s Right.
Finally, a definition of social pathology is suggested which can bring together
the different contributions of each conception while avoiding their pitfalls.U ovom radu se razmatra odnos između intersubjektivne teorije priznanja Aksela
Honeta i njegove političke teorije demokratskog etičkog života, pre svega tako
što se analiziraju potencijali i teškoće vezane za koncepciju socijalne patologije.
Uzimajući u obzir različita značenja koncepcije u Honetovom delu, rad se na početku fokusira na dve formulacije: prvo, na skorašnju raspravu u „Bolestima dru
štva“, koja se delimično može tumačiti i kao nastavak argumentacije iz Prava slobode; i drugo, na implicitnu koncepciju socijalne patologije koja se može pronaći u Borbi za priznanje. Ove dve formulacije se u potpunosti razlikuju u pogledu svojih fenomenoloških, metodoloških, socijalno-ontoloških I etioloških premisa. Smatram da te razlike mogu bolje da se razumeju ako imamo u vidu dva različita shvatanja fundamentalne intuicije koja leži u osnovi pojma socijalne patologije: razumevanje u formi analogije odnosno homologije. Kroz eksplikaciju nekih od realnih ili potencijalnih diskrepancija između ove dve koncepcije, cilj rada je da se ponudi jedna preliminarna osnova za povezivanje ove dve varijante u okviru jedne sveobuhvatne koncepcije pojma socijalne patologije. U svetlu svega navedenog, rad na kraju kritički razmatra treću koncepciju koja je predstavljena u
Patnji neodređenosti i kasnije razvijena, uz određena ograničenja, u Pravu slobode. Konačno, predložena je jedna definicija socijalne patologije koja može da spoji različite doprinose svake koncepcije, ujedno izbegavajući njihove zamke