University of Arts in Belgrade
Digital Repository of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of BelgradeNot a member yet
4571 research outputs found
Sort by
Engaging with precarity: the fatiguing job seeking journey of an early career anthropologist
No full textBased on personal experience, this paper shows how shifting and precarious conditions in
the labour market impact early career researchers. In particular, it focuses on how visa regimes,
citizenship and class difference, and access to “safety nets”, together with structural conditions,
impact academic opportunities and daily life differently in Western and Eastern Europe, and how
they impose mobility
Pravna ideologija i zajednička dobra: zbog čega pravnici zaostaju?
No full textThe last quarter of a century has featured a surge in interest and studies
on the commons, spearheaded, of course, by the efforts of Elinor Ostrom.
These efforts have problematized the once well-established paradigm
of the tragedy of the commons most clearly described by Garrett Hardin
in 1968. One could say that the commons, thus, have become a fundamental
field of study in most social sciences. This is not the case in the field of
legal scholarship (with one noticeable exception that I will discuss later),
which leads me to the overarching issue of this essay, namely the difficult
relationship between jurists and the commons. The phrase “difficult
relationship” does not refer to an explicit antagonism, but to something
even worse: complete indifference and a scandalous lack of knowledge.
While my main purpose is to try to explain this sorry state of affairs, I
also hope to make a more general point on the nature of law and legal
change. In this sense, the commons can be considered a case-study in
legal theory. The main issue of this paper is to tackle following subquestions.
What is the status of commons in the Western European legal
discourse? Why do most legal scholars pay such a poor attention to the
growing literature on the commons in other disciplines? What factors
contribute to this peculiar case of cultural deafness? What promise of
improvement does the future hold?U poslednjih četvrt veka bili smo svedoci rasta interesovanja i istraživanja zajedničkih dobara koje je predvodila Elinor Ostrom. Ovi napori su doveli u pitanje prethodno ustanovljenu paradigmu tragedije zajedničkih dobara koja je najbolje izražena u radu Gareta Hardina iz 1968. godine. Moglo bi se reći da su u međuvremenu zajednička dobra postala sfera istraživanja od fundamentalne važnosti u društvenim naukama. To nije bio slučaj kada je reč o pravnoj misli (uzimajući u obzir da postoji jedan izuzetak koji će biti analiziran kasnije) i to je tema ovog eseja, naime, složeni odnos između zajedničkih dobara i pravnika. Izraz „složeni odnos“ ne treba da upućuje na otvoren antagonizam, već na nešto još gore: potpunu ravnodušnost i skandalozan nedostatak znanja. Iako je moj glavni cilj da ovde objasnim dato stanje stvari, namera mi je da takođe iznesem opštiju tvrdnju o prirodi prava i pravne promene. U tom smislu zajednička dobra se mogu uzeti kao studija slučaja u pravnoj teoriji. Ovaj članak će razmotriti sledeća potpitanja. Koji status zajednička dobra imaju u zapadno-evropskom pravnom diskursu? Zbog čega većina pravnih mislilaca obraća tako malo pažnje na rastuću literaturu o zajedničkim dobrima? Koji faktori su na delu u ovom čudnom slučaju kulturnog slepila? Da li postoje razlozi da u budućnosti dođe do promene u tom pogledu
Elizabeth S. Goodstein, Georg Simmel and the Disciplinary Imaginary, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2017.
No full text
Jelena Ćeriman, Irena Fiket i Krisztina Rácz (ur.), Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica, IFDT i CELAP, Beograd, 2018.
No full textSlučaj transhumanizma: mogućnost primene Ničeove etike i kritike morala danas
No full textTranshumanism, the movement that promotes radical enhancement by
non-traditional means based in scientific and technological advances,
has contributed to contemporary interest in Nietzsche’s philosophy. In
this paper, we are going to claim that transhumanists’ references to
Nietzsche’s philosophy are unfounded. Moreover, we will make a few
remarks about Nietzsche’s ethical doctrine in order to show that his
conception of enhancement, contrary to transhumanist conceptions,
relies on traditional means, such as upbringing and education. Although
Nietzsche’s positive ethical doctrines cannot be used to justify
transhumanist goals, his critique of morality can be used as a critique of
the transhumanist conceptions of human enhancement.Transhumanizam, pokret koji se zalaže za radikalno poboljšanje sredstvima koja su rezultat naučnog i tehnološkog napretka, doprineo je interesovanju za Ničeovu filozofiju danas. U ovom radu navešćemo razloge na osnovu kojih ćemo sugerisati da su ta pozivanja na Ničeovu filozofiju neosnovana. Pri tom ćemo izložiti nekoliko teza o Ničeovom etičkom učenju kako bismo pokazali da se njegovo shvatanje poboljšanja, za razliku od transhumanističkih, oslanja na tradicinalna sredstva kao što su vaspitanje i obrazovanje. Iako se Ničeova pozitivna etička učenja ne mogu primeniti u opravdanju transhumanističkih ciljeva, njegova kritika morala može se upotrebiti u kritici transhumanističkih koncepcija poboljšanja čoveka
“Eternal Ballet” In Plato’s Cave
No full textDie Präsentation versucht, die Frage nach dem Verhältnis von Denken
und Realität im gegenwärtigen technisch-technologischen entstehenden
Vergehen. Verborgen damit sind alle grundlegenden philosophischen
Fragen verbunden, und vor allem die Frage nach der Möglichkeit, „von“
oder „jenseits“ der entstehenden-vergehenden Realität zu denken. Die
zeitgenössische Debatte kehrt damit zum transzendental-immanenten
Charakter der Meinung zurück, die trotz der neu entstandenen/vergangenen
Situation, als Frage möglicher Begründung des philosophischen Wissens
man mit seinen traditionellen Formen und Leistungsweisen vergleichen
kann. Das Feld dieses Tanzes ist eine neue „Höhlenwand“, die in ihrer
kraftvollen Darbietung die Technik und die Technologie inszenieren.This exposition attempts to explore the question of the relationship between thinking and reality in the current technico-technological disappearance-in-appearance. All fundamental philosophical questions are covertly related with it, and above all the question of the possibility of thinking “from” or “beyond” the reality which appears/disappears. The contemporary debate thus returns to the transcendent-immanent character of the thought which, as a question of possible justification of philosophical knowledge, can be compared with its traditional forms and modes of execution in spite of the new situation in its (dis)appearance. The field of this dance is a new “cave wall” that stages technics and technology in their powerful performance
Benjamin Moffitt, The Global Rise of Populism. Performance, Political Style, and Representation, Palo Alto, Stanford University Press, 2016
No full textPravda za životinje
No full text"Nagrada 'Nikola Milošević' - najbolјa knjiga iz oblasti teorije književnosti i umetnosti, estetike i filozofije za 2008. godinu"