University of Arts in Belgrade
Digital Repository of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of BelgradeNot a member yet
4571 research outputs found
Sort by
Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji
No full textČlanak se na komparativan način bavi pojmom pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. Posebna pažnja posvećena je njihovoj konfrontaciji sa psihološkim tumačenjima pa
žnje, kao i metodološkim aspektima njihovih teorija. Analizira se vitalnost, intencionalnost
i temporalnost pažnje, imajući u vidu složenu terminološku pozadinu i kod Bergson i kod
Husserla. Autor smatra da ih povezuje to što pažnju određuju kao dinamičnu unutrašnju
modifikaciju, s različitim dimenzijama sadašnjosti, prošlosti i budućnosti. Istovremeno su
uzete u obzir sličnosti i razlike u pogledu najvažnijih dilema
Towards Methodological Pluralism in Psychological Sciences
No full textAn overreliance on experimental methods in psychology comes with its problems of low context-sensitivity, ecological invalidity, and limited scope of study. A move towards interdisciplinarity and methodological pluralism, along with an increased attention to the cultural context of behavior, can give greater validity to its findings, making psychology a more robust science
"We have taken the attitude": star trek and conflict trek
No full textU ovom članku odnos masovnih medija i društvenih sukoba tematizuje se na način procenjivanja kako jedan određeni medij obrađuje aktuelne tenzije, ali i kako svojom obradom utiče na njih. Reč je o vizuelnom mediju, o televiziji i filmu, ali ne u njihovom „novinarskomˮ aspektu, već o žanru koji se i u tom mediju ostvario i tek tu stekao popularnost: o naučnoj fantastici. Na primeru serija i filmova „franšizeˮ Zvezdanih staza, prikazuje se „dijalektikaˮ uticaja konfliktne društvene zbilje na njene „fantastičneˮ (pre)adaptacije i, obrnuto, povratnog uticaja zamisli drugačijeg sveta na ovaj iz koga se zamišlja.In this article, the relationship between media and social conflicts is tematized in the following way: the authors estimate how one particular medium deals with current tensions, but also how its treatment affects them. It is about a visual medium, about television and film, but not in their ˮjournalisticˮ aspect, but about the genre that realized itself and gained popularity in this medium: science fiction. Exemplifying series and films of the “Star Trekˮ franchise, the authors display the “dialecticsˮ of the impact of a conflicting social reality on its “fantasticˮ (re)adaptations and, conversely, the reverse influence of the conception of the other world on the one it is imagined from. Primarily, the authors discuss the relationship between science fiction visions of the future and the policy pursued at the time of its creation. After presenting the interpretations that praise the critical and emancipatory potential of the product of mass culture, special attention is paid to the opposite ones that discover camouflaged affirmation or justification of the foreign policy of the United States of America it. In conclusion, the authors argue for a well-measured interpretation according to which “Star Trek“ represented benevolent moral corrective to policies of the U. S. administration, whose scope and effect nevertheless remained limited and determined by the context in which it originated
Camps as crucibles of transnational resistance and Transnational guerrillas in the 'shatter zones' of the Balkans and Eastern Front
No full textPoglavlje u knjizi "Fighters across frontiers. Transnational resistance in Europe, 1936-48
Pleasure and Afective Components of Mental States in the Ancient and Epicurean Hedonism
No full textU tekstu se analizira pojam uživanja u periodu od V – III v. pre nove ere,
odnosno razvoj i shvatanje ovog pojma od njegove prve zvanične upotrebe u filozofskim raspravama kod Kirenjana, sve do epikurejskih rasprava koje uživanju daju privilegovan status. Platonova razmišljanja o uživanju svakako nisu od suštinskog interesa u njegovim delima, ali ovde su ukratko analizirana jer mogu da doprinesu potpunijem razumevanju odnosa prema uživanju koje je tada preovladavalo. Tekst bi trebalo da nam, pored istorijske perspektive različitih tumačenja i shvatanja uživanja, ponudi i izvesnu apologiju epikurejskog razumevanja uživanja. Posebnu pomoć u tome pruža nam hipoteza prema kojoj Epikur uživanje ne shvata kao mentalno stanje, već kao afektivnu komponentu odgovarajućih mentalnih stanja.In this paper, we analyze the concept of pleasure in the period from 5th to 3rd century BC, and the development and understanding of this concept, from its officially first use in the Cyrenean philosophical discourses, up to the Epicurean discussions, which give pleasure a privileged status. Plato’s thoughts on pleasure are certainly not of any essential interest in his writings, but they are analyzed briefly here, because they may contribute to the more complete understanding of the attitude towards pleasure that was dominant in his time. This paper should yield, in addition to a historical perspective concerning the various interpretations and accounts of pleasure, a certain apology of the Epicurean account of pleasure. A hypothesis may be especially helpful, according to which Epicurus does not conceive pleasure as a mental state, but rather as an affective component of the corresponding mental state
Gamification of Education: Usage of Game Mechanics to Enhance the Learner Knowledge Adoption
No full textSocijalna ontologija: Batler preko Arent preko Lojdolt
No full textThis short contribution is written on the occasion of the book discussion of Sophie Loidolt’s Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity (2018) at the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory. It presents an attempt to read the two key notions Loidolt elaborates in her book – spaces of meaning and spaces of the public and private – from a critical perspective offered by Judith Butler’s taking up of Arendt’s work. Offering Butler’s conception of social ontology through several major points of contestation with Arendt, I argue against an all too simple reduction of her understanding of the political and normativity to poststructuralist ones.Ovaj kratak doprinos napisan je povodom diskusije o knjizi Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity Sofi Lojdolt na Institutu za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju. On predstavlja pokušaj čitanja dva ključna pojma koja Lojdolt izlaže u svojoj knjizi – prostori značenja i prostori javnog i privatnog – iz kritičke perspektive koju Džudit Batler nudi baveći se radom Arentove. Razmatrajući koncepciju socijalne ontologije Batler kroz nekoliko značajnih tačaka njene rasprave sa Arent zalagaću se protiv olake redukcije njenih shvatanja političkog i normativnog na poststrukturalistička shvatanja
Aristotelove praodluke i izazov nestajanja
No full textThe paper deals with Aristotle’s concept of corruption. First, it reconstructs Aristotle’s debate with the pre-Socratics and then it focuses on the candidates for entity that can perish: form, matter, and substance. The text argues against the widely accepted thesis according to which substance is a corruptio simpliciter without further ado. The paper intensely relies upon ancient and medieval commentators of Aristotle. Finally, special attention is devoted to the dimension of time and the problem of actuality.Ovaj rad tematizuje Aristotelov pojam nestajanja. Prvo, rekonstruiše Aristotelovu raspravu da predsokratcima, zatim se fokusira na pojedine kandidate za entitete koji mogu da nestanu: formu, materiju i supstanciju. Tekst pruža argumente protiv široko prihaćene teze da je supstancija corruptio simpliciter bez ikakvih rezervi. Rad se o velikoj meri oslanja i na antičke i srednjovekovne komentatore Aristotela. Na kraju, uzima se u obzir i dimenzija vremena, odnosno aktualnosti
Kula od slonovače i barikade: Markuze i Adorno o razdvajanju teorije od prakse
No full textThe events of 1968/69 initiated a dispute between Adorno and Marcuse over the (alleged) separation of theory and praxis. While Marcuse “stood at the barricades” Adorno sought recluse in the “ivory tower”. Marcuse and German students perceived Adorno’s move as departure from fundamental postulates of critical theory as laid down in Horkheimer’s 1937 essay. Adorno died amidst the process of clarifying his differences with Marcuse and thus the “unlimited discussions” between the two remain unfinished. This paper sets to examine how both Marcuse and Adorno remained dedicated to the unity of theory and praxis, albeit in different ways. I argue that Adorno did not separate theory and praxis; instead, he perceived the gap between critical theory and concrete historical situation. Adorno rejected simple and unreflective translation of theory into praxis. Hence his attempt to recalibrate critical theory. Marcuse’s and Adorno’s differences lie in their different evaluation of the student movement and this (mis)evaluation was context related. My second argument is that Marcuse/Adorno disagreement is partly caused by the absence of the two from the concrete historical context.Događaji iz 1968/69. su inicirali raspravu između Adorna i Markuzea oko (navodnog) odvajanja teorije od prakse. Dok je Markuze „stajao na barikadama“ Adorno je težio da se osami u „kuli od slonovače“. Markuze i nemački studenti su Adornov potez videli kao odstupanje od osnovnih postulata kritičke teorije kako ih je Horkhajmer postavio 1937. godine u svom eseju. Adorno je preminuo tokom procesa razjašnjavanja svojih neslaganja sa Markuzeom, te je „neprestana diskusija“ između njih ostala nedovršena. Ovaj rad teži da ispita kako su Markuze i Adorno ostali posvećeni jedinstvu teorije i prakse ali na drugačiji način. Tvrdiću da Adorno nije odvajao teoriju od prakse. Umesto toga on je video jaz između kritičke teorije i konkretne istorijske situacije. Adorno je odbacivao jednostavno i nerefleksivno prevođenje teorije u praksu. Dakle, Adorno je pokušao da rekalibrira kritičku teoriju. Razlike između Markuzea i Adorna leže u njihovim različitim procenjivanjima studentskog pokreta, a to (pogrešno) procenjivanje je vezano za kontekst. Moj drugi argument će biti da je rasprava između Markuzea i Adorna delimično uslovljena njihovim odsustvom iz konkretnog istorijskog konteksta
Dušan Ristić, Granice diskursa , Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing, 2018.
No full textDušan Ristić, Granice diskursa , Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing, 2018