Organic Eprints
Not a member yet
39174 research outputs found
Sort by
Empirical evidence supports neither land sparing nor land sharing as the main strategy to manage agriculture–biodiversity tradeoffs
Agricultural land-use change is a key driver of biodiversity loss. Two alternative strategies have been discussed to align biodiversity conservation with agricultural production in landscapes containing agriculture: (i) land sparing, with intensive agriculture strictly separated from natural land, and (ii) land sharing, a mosaic of low-intensity agriculture and natural elements. Sparing builds on high-yielding intensive production to provide more area for natural habitats; sharing aims to support biodiversity within agricultural landscapes by employing wildlife-friendly farming practices. A considerable body of literature addresses conceptual aspects of these strategies, but empirical evidence on how they support biodiversity is scarce. We assessed the empirical evidence by analyzing 57 peer-reviewed articles identified in a systematic literature review, of which only 17 allowed a comparison of the strategies. These 17 articles contained 27 cases of comparisons, of which 52% reported that context-specific solutions combining sharing and sparing performed best, and exclusively focusing on one strategy cannot balance the competing demands of food production and biodiversity. In 41% cases, land sparing performed best and in 7% land sharing. However, these 17 studies almost exclusively focus on specific contexts and metrics (e.g. species population density of tropical forest birds) and the other 40 studies lack important elements for a comparison, such as the assessment of agricultural production performance. The empirical basis is thus sparse and does not support statements claiming that, in general, either land sharing or land sparing strategies are unequivocally better. It rather highlights the importance of context-specific solutions for aligning agricultural production and biodiversity conservation
Des pâturages aux étables
Rencontre sectorielle avec de nombreux échanges: La 4ème Journée du Bétail Bio aura lieu fin octobre sur le domaine du FiBL Frick
«Ouvrir la voie vers l’avenir»
C’est avec cette devise que les douze postes thématiques de la Journée du Bétail Bio invitent à s’informer, parler technique et discuter. Nous en présentons quatre
Une agriculture biologique sous contrat
Le domaine Wassergut Canitz est situé dans la sensible zone de captage de l’eau potable de la ville de Leipzig. Le FiBL Allemagne y a organisé en juin 2025 les Öko-Feldtage
Policy brief - Definition of Organic Plant Breeding for registration of Organic Varieties suitable for organic production
Definition of Organic Plant Breeding for registration of Organic Varieties suitable for organic production. Illustrated by explaining different breeding strategies
Comprendere i marchi bio - Guida all’acquisto dei prodotti biologici
La presente guida tecnica offre una panoramica dei marchi bio più comuni in Svizzera. Le spiegazioni sul contesto e sulle esigenze dei diversi marchi devono servire da guida per l'acquisto di prodotti biologici
Betriebsmittelliste 2026 für den biologischen Landbau in der Schweiz
Die Betriebsmittelliste enthält alle für den biologischen Landbau in der Schweiz zugelassenen Dünger und Substrate, Pflanzenschutzmittel, Reinigungs-, Desinfektions- und Hygienemittel, Mittel gegen Parasiten sowie Futter- und Siliermittel
Märkte heute - Biowelt morgen
Dieser Vortrag gibt einen Überblick über einige der neuesten und wichtigsten Entwicklungen im Bio-Markt. Zudem zeigt er auf, welche Fragen und Themen die Bio-Welt von morgen prägen könnten
Use of genetic markers in wheat breeding for organic heterogeneous material
Describing experienced with the use of MAS in OHM breedin
Carbon and Nitrogen balances in an innovative closed composting system and the impact of feedstock on compost quality and plant growth
Paper on results from the ComFerm compost (ComCrop) on N balance and effects of compost quality on plant and soi