German University of Administrative Sciences
DoPuS Dokumenten- und Publikationsserver SpeyerNot a member yet
6419 research outputs found
Sort by
(K)ein Recht auf Analog?
Dr. Botta hielt diesen Vortrag online für das Digitale Kolloquium - Netzwerk Promovierender und Habilitierender zum Digitalrecht am 13.6.2022
Die Erfahrungen aus der Corona-Pandemie haben die Ziele der Verwaltungsdigitalisierung nachhaltig verändert. Waren digitale Verfahren bislang vornehmlich als Ergänzung zur analogen Verwaltungspraxis verstanden worden, heißt es nunmehr „digital first“. Erstmalig besteht der politische Wille, einen wirklich digitalen Staat zu schaffen. Doch diese Entwick-lung bringt nicht für alle Bürger:innen nur Vorteile mit sich. Daher lässt sich fragen, ob die:der Einzelne einen grundrechtlichen Anspruch darauf hat, von einem rein digitalen Staat verschont zu bleiben
Artificial Intelligence and the law
Herr Kolain hielt diesen Vortrag am 17.06.2022 als panelist bei der Tagung "2nd Quo Vadis AI International Conference" in Athen, Griechenland
§ 33, Normsetzung und andere Formen exekutivischer Selbstprogrammierung
In dem flutenden Strom moderner Verwaltungstätigkeit braucht es Orientierung und Halt - nicht nur für die Verwaltung selbst, sondern auch für Betroffene, Mitwirkende und Außen-stehende. Diese Funktion, dem Verwaltungshandeln durch einen übergeordneten Hand-lungskompass Berechenbarkeit zu verleihen, ist die Kernaufgabe exekutivischer Selbst-programmierung
Making Choice Meaningful - Tackling Dark Patterns in Cookie and Consent Banners through European Data Privacy Law
Dark patterns steer users into taking decisions they would not have made otherwise. They are widespread in ‘cookie banners’ where they nudge or otherwise lead users into ‘consen-ting’ to intensive and controversial processing of personal data, such as online tracking and behavioural targeting. The prevalence of dark patterns in the privacy context is not only due to an enforcement deficit. It is also due to a lack of legal provisions that effectively implement the principles of privacy by design and by default. The legislator should address privacy dark patterns by ensuring meaningful choice of data subjects
Ex Officio Third Country Subsidies' Review: Similarities with and Differences to State Aid Procedure
In May 2021 the European Commission tabled a draft Third Country Subsidies Regulation which stands between trade and competition policy. This new instrument establishes a review of third country subsidies with a view to addressing the competition distortion resulting from foreign subsidies granted to undertakings economically active in the EU internal market. As the new tool complements EU State aid scrutiny with a view to foreign subsidies, the present contribution compares the general procedures and provisions of the new regulation with EU State aid law. It will be shown that despite many similarities with State aid law, considerable differences remain which can be explained by looking at the different procedural and substantive context
La sanità in Germania: il modello bismarckiano di assicurazione sociale tra passato e attualità
La selezione del personale amministrativo: Un raffronto fra Italia e Germania
Il saggio analizza le procedure di selezione utilizzate nell’ordinamento italiano e in quello tedesco, sia nell’ambito dell’accesso al pubblico impiego sia rispetto alle progressioni di carriera. L’analisi comparativa si propone di verificare se le procedure impiegate in Germania per garantire l’affermazione del «principio della selezione dei migliori», le promozioni attuate prevalentemente attingendo al personale interno e il sistema di «federalismo competitivo» rappresentino un modello da imitare, suscettibile di essere traslato nella realtà italiana. Proprio le apparenti distanze fra i due ordinamenti suggeriscono l’opportunità di descriverne e compararne le caratteristiche attraverso la scelta di «coppie dicotomiche», volte a stabilire se i contrasti immanenti alle procedure di selezione siano reali o apparenti oppure se si tratti piuttosto di percorsi diversi, orientati nella stessa direzione.The contribution explores the selection procedures used in the Italian and German legal systems, in terms of access to public employment and with regard to career promotion. The comparative analysis is aimed at verifying whether the procedures used in Germany based on the «principle of selecting the best», promotions drawing mainly on internal staff and the «competitive federalism» system are an example to imitate, suitable for implementation in Italy. The apparent distances between the two systems suggest describing and comparing their features as «dichotomous pairs» in an attempt to establish through comparison whether the differences in selection procedures are real or apparent, or rather whether they are different paths pointing in the same direction
Universities between Inter- and Renationalization: An Introduction
An inherent tension between the global and the national frame of reference defines the modern research university. This seems to be the conflicting diagnosis of two recently published volumes on the matter: In their book on The University and the Global Knowledge Society, David J. Frank and John W. Meyer (2020) link the spectacular rise of the university to its lasting claim to generate “universalized truths” (Frank & Meyer 2020). John Aubrey Douglass and others (2021), in contrast, paint a decidedly different picture. In their volume on Neo-Nationalism and Universities, Douglass and eleven co-authors trace how universities have increasingly come under pressure by a recent wave of neo-nationalism that has challenged the very idea of the global research university right to its core. In presenting these contrasting accounts, the two volumes raise a number of pressing questions for science studies and higher education research more broadly: How do recent developments of neonationalism and populism connect to the longer history of national interests in science as a tool at the hand of the state? How do such nationalist tendencies play into, or counter, the global expansion of the university? And finally, how can we secure the transnational and open idea of a university in times when the specific organizations as well as their cultural core are threatened by national governments? To engage with these questions, this Review Symposium brings together an interdisciplinary group of scholars who discuss the two
volumes and share their diverse perspectives on Universities between Inter- and Re-Nationalization