HHU Journals
Not a member yet
    587 research outputs found

    Care and Empathy: On Michael Slote\u27s Sentimentalist Ethics

    No full text

    Transcendental Arguments, How-Possible Questions and the Aim of Epistemology

    No full text

    Nagel on Conceivability

    No full text
    In the sixth chapter of The View from Nowhere, Thomas Nagel aims to identify a form of idealism, to isolate the argument for it and to counter this argument. The position that Nagel takes to be idealist is that what there is must be possibly conceivable by us. In this paper, I show that Nagel has not made a convincing case against this position. I then present an alternative case. In light of this alternative case, we have reason to reject an important example that Nagel offers of a contemporary idealist, namely Donald Davidson

    Précis of THE HUMAN ANIMAL

    No full text

    Précis: The Phenomenological Mind

    No full text

    Phenomenology, Neuroscience and Impairment

    No full text

    Phenomenology as a Toolbox for Cognitive Science

    No full text

    Fisicalismo e o Mistério da Consciência Fenomenal

    No full text
    Phenomenal properties are commonly considered as a special kind of entities because of their peculiar features, such as privacy, perspectivity and necessary ownership to the individual. Such sui generis properties are not easily accommodated in a physicalist framework, since physical objects and properties do not have such features, and it is difficult to conceive any physical entity in terms of these sui generis properties. In this regard, this paper aims to: (1) deal with the difficulty to conciliate phenomenal properties and physicalism; (2) consider the solutions proposed by Michael Tye to this problem; and (3) revisit the knowledge argument in the light of Tye’s PANIC theory. I conclude this paper by comparing Tye’s proposal with the distintion between reflexive and referential content, proposed by John Perry

    Universalismo e Particularismo nas Discussões Modernas

    No full text
    In this paper I will discuss the role of national identity in the light of modern political and moral theories. My strategy here is threefold: firstly, I will present an overview of pre-modern theories of rights and duties of individuals, and then show how they fail to make sense of the notions of freedom and equality (of rights); secondly, I will introduce modern political and moral theories (more specifically, social contract theories) as an outstanding alternative to those ones, given the paradigm of values established by modern society; thirdly, I will argue against the supposed universality or objectivity of modern political and moral theories, taking into account the role of national identity

    Church’s and Gödel’s Slingshot Arguments

    No full text

    0

    full texts

    587

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    HHU Journals
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇