data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
Data for the article: "Restoring the common hamster’s farmland habitat - how crop associations might benefit Cricetus cricetus hibernation and reproduction"
Monitoring of common hamsters during hibernation and reproduction, year 2021-2022. Data includes body temperatures and mass monitoring, genetics, reproductive outputs
Replication data for: Fig 8.14, top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, UPDs, 21 Nov 2025
FILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: alarm calls, closest vs farther away, UPDs
Filename: Fig 8.14, top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, UPDs, 21 Nov 2025
OLD Filename: UPDs, Alarm calls, closest vs farther from badger, 10 April 2019
436/1876 of closest UPDs = 23.24% DID give alarm call
1440/1876 of closest UPDs = 76.76% DID NOT give alarm call
763/2575 farther UPDs = 29.63% DID give alarm call
1812/2575 of farther UPDs = 70.37% DID NOT give alarm call
The summaries I provide immediately above and in Fig 8.14 for my new
book are from the SUMMATION OF DATA FROM ALL YEARS
Variable = Frequency = number of observations of calling or non-calling for
closest and not closest prairie dogs
Close prairie dog = 1 = closest to prairie dog
Close prairie dog = 2 = NOT closest to prairie dog
UPD alarm call = 1 = prairie dog DID give alarm call
UPD alarm call = 2 = prairie dog did NOT give alarm call
For statistical analysis, I did a 2x2 chi-square test
These data used for Fig 8.14, Top, in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 03 June 2025.
I considered data from the same prairie dog in different years to be independent.
Counts for this file come from study of alarm call raw data sheets.
Filename: Fig 8.14, Top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, UPDs, 21 Nov 2025
I considered data from the same prairie dog
on the same day and on different days and in different years to be independent.
I assume that I checked these data TWO TIMES, but I cannot find that assurance
Dromiciops gliroides MNHN.CG.1982.1075
This dataset includes the slices of the specimen MNHN.CG.1982.1075 from the species Dromiciops gliroides (Mammalia, Marsupiala) which have been scanned with a synchrotron at the ESFR Grenoble (ESFR Experiment LS-2427 ED19/2015) with a resolution of 6.23µm
Replication Data for: Fig 5.3, Bottom , BGUW, fleas per juvenile in May or June,13 Oct 2025
FILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: BGUW, fleas per juvenile, May-June
File name = Fig 5.3, Bottom, BGUW, fleas per weanling in May or June, 13 Oct 2025
I used these data for Fig 5.3, bottom graph, of Hoogland 2026
Numbers shown are means + one standard error (SEM)
The number above each SE line indicates the number of adult prairie dogs
examined for fleas during marking and handling (details in Hoogland 2026)
WTPD = white-tailed prairie dog BTPD = black-tailed prairie dog
GPD = Gunnison's prairie dog WTPD = white-tailed prairie dog
BGUW = black-tails, gunnisons, utahs, and white-tails
Weanling = juvenile prairie dog at first juvenile emergence
All data in this table are from weanling prairie dogs only--i.e., no data from adults.
I used only one flea-count per weanling prairie dog.
All data for flea-counts in this figure are from JUVENILE prairie dogs only--i.e., no data from juveniles.
Data from flea counts from ADULT prairie dogs are in Fig 5.3, Top and Middle Graphs
I used only one flea-count per adult prairie dog per time-period.
These data ready for longterm storage on 17 Sept 2025.
Note: these data are summaries only. Most of the raw data are in
EXCEL file = BGUW, Final flea and body masses, 14 Jan 2025.
See figures 3.5 and 3.6 for intersexual differences in flea-counts for adults and juveniles.
BTPDs
GPDs
UPDs
WTPD
Seine: Le quai Saint-Bernard à Paris, carte de Perronet (1783)
Ce plan coté et ce profil, auquel le célèbre ingénieur Jean-Rodolphe Perronet a apposé sa signature, représentent le quai Saint-Bernard (1783).
On remarque que les différentes hauteurs d'eau et les dimensions de la grève sont indiqués, sans doute dans le but de prolonger les quais.
De l'autre côté du quai, là où les aménagements sont moins récents, les bords du fleuve accueillent toutes sortes d'activités : plusieurs ports ont vocation à accueillir des bateaux transportant un certain type de marchandise (le port de la halle aux vins, le port pour l'approvisionnement du pavé de Paris...).
On remarque également un emplacement réservé aux bains, un emplacement réservé aux coches royaux (pour abreuver les chevaux ?) proche du jardin du roi, un corps de garde, etc.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Seine_Paris_Quai_Saint_Bernard_1783.tiff
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/22. Numérisation en 2014.
Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Replication data for: Fig 9.15 and 9.16, WTPDs, female kinships in home territory, 09 Dec 2025
FILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Kinships within home clan territory, WTPDs, coefficient of genetic relatedness
File name = Fig 9.15 and 9.16, WTPDs, female kinships in home territory, 09 Dec 2025
OLDFile name = WTPDs, Female kinships in home terr in 2012, 08 March 2023
Shown here are kinships among WTPD FEMALES ONLY--no data from yearling males
All kinships are based on maternal genetic relationships only--no information from paternities
For littermates, I assume FULL SIBSHIPS for all cases--i.e., I assume single paternity
when assigning maternal kinships, but I recognize that some littermate
siblings ere half siblings rather than full siblings
Half sisters are nonlittermate females of the same mother born in different years.
All data in this file have now been checked TWO TIMES on 08 March 2023
See data for Legend to Kinship Score
My last year of research with WTPDs was 2012, when I had the
best information on kinships
These data used for Figures 9.15 and 9.16 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
Kincheck = X means that I checked the kinship and the r-value.
r-value X 100 = coefficient of genetic relatedness (r) X 100 (for easier statistics)
No known kinship means no kinship, but I might not have been able to detect distant kinships
All r-values are based on maternal genetic relationships only--no information from paternities
These data are from WTPD study colony at Arapaho National Wildlife near
Walden, Colorado, in 2012 only.
No data on UPD kinships from other years.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
Note well: These kinships do NOT include data from sexually active males, which (almost)
always were from a different clan
once rem = once removed
When female WTPD had more than one common ancestor, I have depicted only the closer kinship in this EXCEL file.
For coefficients of relatedness (r) for kinships in this figure, see also Table 18.2, or Table 22.5 of Hoogland 2026.
For each species, data are shown for one year only. For WPDs, the year was May 2012.
File name = Fig 9.15 and 9.16, WTPDs, female kinships in home territory, 09 Dec 2025
WTPD study colony in 2022 had 9 clans.
r = coefficient of genetic relatednes
Shapefiles de la Zone Atelier Antarctique et Terres Australes
Shapefiles de la ZATA et de ses sites ateliers (Archipels de Crozet et Kerguelen, îles Saint-Paul et Amsterdam, Terre Adélie
Replication data for: Fig 9.8, Top, BTPDs, coterie size for same coteries over time, 04 Dec 2025
FILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: BTPDs, coterie size for same coteries over time
File name = Fig 9.8, Top, BTPDs, coterie size for same coteries over time, 04 Dec 2025
OLDfile name, BTPDs, ORDERED coterie sizes with SEMs,
I created this file from SYSTAT file = samecot.sys,
which I used to create Figure 6.6 of Hoogland 1995 (my first book).
I trust that I checked this file TWO TIMES upon creation.
Note that Figure 6.6 of Hoogland 1995 shows coterie designation in
ascending order of mean coterie size.
Column-1 = coterie designation
Column-2 = mean coterie size
Column-3 = standard error of mean
Date = 28 April 2020
Data for this file checked TWO TIMES on 28 April 2020
File name = BTPDs, ORDERED coterie sizes
These data used for Figure 9.8 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 04 Feb 2025.
File name = Fig 9.8, Top, BTPDs, coterie size for same coteries over time, 04 Dec 202
Data for osmolality and water harshness
This data shows the relationship between osmolality and season, social category, number of food plants and temperature in striped mice from South Afric
Replication data for: Fig 9.14, WTPDs, Clansize vs male ARS, 05 Dec 2025
FILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: WTPDs, clan size, male ARS
File name = Fig 9.14, WTPDs, Clansize vs male ARS, 05 Dec 2025
OLD File name = WTPDs, Male ARS vs clan size, 01 Sept 2021
I made this file by adding information about clan size to the
following file: File name =
WTPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops,babies,yrl,12 Apr 2021
Details below for WTPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops,babies,yrl,12 Apr 2021
If a WTPD male had >=2 half clans, I used the LARGER of the two half-clans
for clan size for the WTPD male.
In 2006, for example, WTPD male-R16 had one half-clan of size 2 (R16B) and one
half-clan of size 7 (R16A). For R16 for this file, I used clan size = 7
If TWO WTPD males shared the same multi-male clan, I used the same clan
size for both males. In 2011, for example, I used the same clan size of 4
for both male-19 and male-49. Multi-male clans were rare for WTPDs.
On 01-02 Sept 2021, I add info on clan sizes.
I check info on clan sizes TWO TIMES on 02 Sept 2021.
Clansize = number of adults and yearlings living in the same clan territory
Weight = male body mass just before or during the mating season
Date = 12 April 2021
OLD File name = WTPDs, Male ARS-LRS for cops,babies,yrl,12 Apr 2021
OLD File name = WTPDs, Male ARS-LR for cops, babies, yrl, 22 Mar 2021
Change made on 12 April 2021: 3 babies (not 4) for male-01 (87) in 2010
I started this file from File name = WTPDs, Male ARS and LRS for cops, 19 Dec 2020
Note, however, that now counts of babies and yearlings are accurate FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL MALE
New cases added to file since 19 Dec 2020 start with 101, end with 114
All data checked TWO TIMES on 22-23 March 2021
Since 19 Dec 2020, I have added ages for OXUn (621) in 2009, 8#2 (949)
in 2009, 2010, and 2011, and O#2 (J94) in 2012.
For this latest ages, if a male was captured in autumn (September or October), I
assumed he was about 5 months old at that point, and that he was a yearling (1-year old)
in the following spring. The logic here is that almost all male 5-month olds were still coming
aboveground in autumn. Older males (>=2 years), by contrast, were almost always
hibernating by autumn. I can only think of one >=2 year old WTPD male that we captured in autumn
Note well: All analyses are for COPULATIONS SEEN. I do nothing here with copulations INFERRED
from microsites with no behavioral observations of estrus and copulations.
Change made on 12 April 2021: 3 babies (not 4) for male-01 (87) in 2010
File name = WTPDs, Male ARS and LRS for cops, 19 Dec 2020
Date = 19 Dec 2020
This file is IDENTICAL to file = WTPDs, MCs vs cops, male body mass, 18 Dec 2020
I have created this identical file so that I can keep it with other ARS files
Weanlings sired = Number of emergent juveniles weaned by females with whom male copulated
Yearlings sired = number of yearlings produced by females with whom male copulated
Paternities were determined by Stephen Keller and Regina Trott in the following publication:
Hoogland JL, et al. 2019. Polyandry and polygyny in a social rodent: An integrative perspective
based on social organization, copulations, and genetics. Front Ecol Evol. 7.
Each male had unique eartags.
If we had data from the same male in different years, then that male might have
1, 2, 3, or even 4 "Dognumbers"
This file has now been checked TWO TIMES
Weanlings sired = emergent juveniles sired as determined from microsatellites by Stephen R. Keller and Regina Trott.
Yearling sired = yearlings sired as determined from microsatellites by Stephen R. Keller and Regina Trott
Yearling sired = yearlings sired as determined from microsatellites by Stephen R. Keller and Regina Trott
These WTPD data used for Figure 9.14 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
File name = Fig 9.14, WTPDs, Clansize vs male ARS, 05 Dec 2025
No information on WTPD clantypes in this EXCEL file