data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
Aisne: Cours de l'Aisne depuis la limite du département des Ardennes jusqu'à l'embouchure de la Vesle, carte de Marcilly (1834)
No full textCe plan présente le cours de l'Aisne depuis la limite du département des Ardennes jusqu'à l'embouchure de la Vesle. C'est un plan courbe, qui suit le cours de l'Aisne.
La carte a été réalisée en 1834 par Marcilly, ingénieur en chef à Soissons.
Cette carte présente un projet de canal de canal latéral entre Neuchâtel et le passage du bac de Condé-sur-Aisne.
Le canal et les ouvrages qui s'y rapportent sont représentés en rouge.
Cette carte est élaborée selon le « genre fini », qui apporte un grand soin aux détails et à la couleur, qui doit être transparente et s’approcher le plus possible de la nature. Le tracé est minutieux et appliqué et l’on distingue même les ombres des arbres.
Le canal latéral à l'Aisne a ouvert en 1841, sur une longueur de 51,5 km.
Rasters GeoTIFF :
EAT_Aisne_Ardennes_Vesle_Marcilly_1834_1.tif
EAT_Aisne_Ardennes_Vesle_Marcilly_1834_2.tif
EAT_Aisne_Ardennes_Vesle_Marcilly_1834_3.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10049/1/8.
Numérisation en 2015. Géoréférencement en 2015 par Juliette AUDET. Métadonnées par Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en juin 2015.</p
Data and Rcodes for studying natality of social mammals bred in zoos during COVID-19 lockdowns
No full textThe data set was used for the article "No baby boom of social mammals in European zoos consecutive to COVID-19 lockdowns " published as a pre-print in bioRXiv (doi: 10.1101/2025.03.05.641480v1).
The data set consists of 9 distinct elements:
- The first element labelled "1.Summed_data_per_country.csv" is a table in .csv format (Excel software) summarising the yearly number of births (recorded in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021), the number of births recorded in the births observation time windows [2018-2020] and [2020-2022], life history traits and management in a breeding programme for each of the 34 studied species.
- The second element labelled "2.Species_data.csv" is a table in .csv format (Excel software) corresponding to the database of life history traits and whether managed in a breeding programme for each of the 34 studied species.
- The third element labelled "3.Births_data.csv" is a table in .csv format (Excel software) corresponding to an extract of the database of births that was used for the analyes. In this extract, the database is restricted to the first 21 raws because of confidentiality [All raw data used for this study (Species360 Data Use Approval Number 83970) cannot be publicly shared, as Species360 is the custodian (not the owner) of their members’ data. Raw data are accessible through Research Request applications (form available at https://conservation.species360.org/data-sharing/)].
- The fourth element labelled "4.covid-19_responses_2022-08-25" is a table in .csv format (Excel software) corresponding to the database of responses to COVID-19 in European countries that was used for the analyses.
- The fifth element labelled "5.Data_Lockdowns.r" is a code in .r format (R software) corresponding to the script used to generate the database of zoo closure periods used in the analyses.
- The sixth element labelled "6.Analysis_byYears.r " is a code in .r format (R software) corresponding to the script used to compare the number of births across years.
- The seventh element labelled "7.Analysis_byWindowsObservation.r" is a code in .r format (R software) corresponding to the script used to analyse number of births in periods following the lockdowns and corresponding to any conception during closure (from 2020 to 2022), as compared with the same periods in the two previous years (2018 and 2019).
- The eigth element labelled "8.PowerTest.r" is a code in .r format (R software) corresponding to the script used to perform the power tests.
- The ninth element labelled "readme.txt" is a text in .txt format with further explanations regarding the files, notably the variables of the databases
Shapefiles de la Zone atelier Environnementale Rurale Argonne
No full textShapefiles de la ZARG et de ses sites ateliers (2025-01-01
Data and Analysis of "Lost in Wilderness" survey
No full textThe data set consists of five distinct elements. The first element is a text in .docx format (Word software) corresponding to the four translations of the online survey ('Lost in Wilderness') associated with the article by Zeller et al. (2025) published in People and Nature. The second element is a table in .csv format (Excel software) corresponding to the database associated with this article. The third element is a table in .csv format (Excel software) corresponding to the classification of the animals used in the survey associated with this article. The fourth element is a code in .RMD format (R and R-studio softwares) corresponding to the script used to analyze the database. The fifth element is a text in .txt format with further explanations regarding the files, notably the variables of the database
Original floral, life-history and reproductive trait data for 364 angiosperm species
No full textOriginal data used in the analyses of the manuscript "An angiosperm-wide perspective on reproductive strategies and floral traits". Life-history (in particular floral) and reproductive system traits were gathered in the PROTEUS database, of which this data file was output on 11 December 2025. Data are identical to those used in the analyses (21 November 2024)
Replication data for: Fig 10.7, Bottom, UPDs, clan type vs litter size, 16 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: UPDs, clan size, clan type, litter size
File name = Fig 10.7, Bottom, UPDs, clan type vs litter size, 16 Dec 2025
OLDFile name = UPDs, Clansize and Clantype vs Fem ARS, 30 Sept 2021
I started this file from File name = UPDs, Clansize vs FEM ARS, 10 Sept 2021
I will RE-ORDER the file by ASCENDING CLANSIZE--to make it easier to assign clantypes
On 29-30 Sept 2021, I check data for Clansize and Clantype TWO TIMES. Other data checked TWO TIMES EARLIER. See below.
Clansize = clan size = Number of adults and yearlings living in same territory
Clantype = Clan type. See immediately below.
Clantype = 0 = No-male clan
Clantype = 1 = One-male clan
Clantype = 0.5 = Half-male clan
Clantype = 2 = Multi-male clan
Correction on 28 Sept 2021: BB8 (J81) in 1998. Littsize and Yearling now missing data. BB8 killed by dog on 03 April 1998.
Correction on 29 Sept 2021: 74 (O7) in 1999 . Clan size now 5 (was 4)
Correction on 29 Sept 2021: 91 (O87) in 2001. Clansize now 3 (was missing data), Clantype now 1 (was missing data)
Correction on 29 Sept 2021: 56A (T97) in 2001. Clansize now 3 (was missing data), Clantype now 1 (was missing data)
Correction on 29 Sept 2021: Info added for Clansize and Clantype for Unknown#5 in 2001
Correction on 29 Sept 2021: Info added for Clansize and Clantype for 56A (T97) in 2001
Correction on 30 Sept 2021: Littsize of 5 added for HRS (C65) in 1998 (was missing data)
No info on yearlings for HRS (C65) in 1998, because HRS died from plague in late June 1998.
Littsize = litter size at weaning
Yearlings = number of offspring that survived for >=9 months after weaning
Marchwt = body mass in March or early April before weaning
Maywt = body mass in May or early June at time of first juvenile emergences
OLD File name = UPDs, Clansize vs FEM ARS, 10 Sept 2021
I started this file from File name = UPDs, FEMS, ARS, with Mincops, 30 May 2021
On 10 Sept 2021, I carefully check clansizes. Because there is no evidence that clan
size affects any aspect of UPD female ARS, I have not checked clan sizes a second time.
Littersize = liter size at weaning
Yearling = number of emergent juveniles that survived for >=9 months.
Mother's age = mother's age in years
Much of this file comes from SYSTAT file = Utahpart.sys,
which was checked TWO TIMES for Hoogland 2013 (J Mammal)
File name = UPDs, FEMS, ARS, with Mincops, 30 May 2021
Females that were known to give birth sometimes were classified as either tiny
or TDF in May or June. So, information on Partur for this file might be unreliable
unless the condition was either lac, MDF, or LDF.
Tiny or TDF = tiny teats, or Tiny, and flat
Partur = parturition. Partur 1 = DID give birth. Partur = 0 did NOT give birth.
29 May 2021: The following variables have been checked TWO TIMES:
UPD, Eartag, Marchwt, Maywt, Mothage, Final age, Littsize, Yearling, Maxcop, Mincop
Still to check: Partur. I probably will NOT double check this variable--because often hard to quantify
Marchwt and Maywt were checked TWO TIMES with weights in Eartag summary sheets, all of
which were checked ONE TIME ONLY
For some UPDs in 2005, I have added an "x" to the eartag number--
to avoid confusion with UPDs in early years that had the same eartag number.
Duplicate eartags might have occurred with the following letters: A, C, F, H,
Consider using THIS DATASET for completed analyses such as body mass vs litter size,
body mass vs wean, body mass vs parturition, and so forth
I will revise certain cases after getting information about maternites and
paternities from microsats via Steve Keller
If an estrous female and a sexually active male went to bed TOGETHER AT THE SAME TIME, I scored that
as a definite cop. If they woke up together but did not go to bed together, I scored
that as a possible cop under Maxcop, but NOT as a cop under Min cop. If they went
to bed together at DIFFERENT TIMES, I scored that as s a possible cop under Maxcop, but NOT as a cop under Mincop.
I score a 2-min BD as a good cop. I do NOT score BDs of 0.5 min or 1 min as good cops.
However, I score every ABOVEGROUND COP as a good cop--even if for only 30 sec
1st of 2 cops = 1 = data from first cop only for double-estrous females. I will EXCLUDE these cases
(N = 3) from analyses of ARS and LRS. I will INCLUDE these data for examination of polyandry
When a male and an female woke up together on the day after the female's estrus but did NOT
go to bed together at the same approximate time, I wonder how often they copulated…
Note on 14 June: I must add 6SBS (P51) from 1999--No litter, No yearlings..NO CHANGE YET
Note on 16 June 2021: Note change for 96 (R23) 2003. Yearlings now 5 instead of 2.
So, two changes for this file as of 16 June 2021.
This file is also in Folder for chapter on Polyandry.
I have NOT done the stats for this file for polyandry vs ARS of UPD females. I will wait until I analyze
stats for littsize and yearlings--to verify that information is correct.
For this file, changes to 6SBS (P51) in 1995 made on 09 Sept 2021
For this file, changes for 96 (R23) made earlier
No data on clan sizes and clan types in 1995, my first year of research with UPDs at
Horse Corral Colony at Bryce Canyon National Park. I did not start research until May 1995.
These data used for Figure 10.1 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 05 Feb 2025.
For longterm storage, this file also called Fig 10.1, UPDs, Clansize, clantype, by year, 11 Feb 2025
This file also contains some variables unrelated to clansize and clantype.
These data used for Fig 10.7 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 12 Feb 2025.
Unk = Unknown Imm = Immigrant
No-male clan had no resident sexually mature male in May
Half-male clan shared a single sexually mature male in May with another clan
One-male clan had a single resident sexually mature male in May
Multi-male clan had >=2 sexually mature males in May
For more information about clan types, see Chapter 10 of Hoogland 2025
Litter size = litter size at first juvenile emergence = number of weanlings
Yearlings = number of weanlings that survived for >=9 months after first juvenile emergence
"Maternities from microsats" were determined from microsat data from Steve Keller and Regina Trott
Unk = Unknown
Clan size = number of adults and yearlings living in the same clan territory
Final age = oldest age known or estimated for individual GPD
TDF Tiny Dry Flat nipples = no parturition or abortion very soon after copulation
SDF = Small Dry Flat nipples = probable parturition, but abortion soon after copulation
MDF = Medium Dry Flat nipples = no weaning, but parturition occurred and loss of preweaned offspring
---probably about 2-3 weeks after copulation
LAC = lactating = female that weaned a litter
Microsat = microsatellite
est = estimated
disapp = disappeared
File name = Fig 10.7, Bottom, UPDs, clan type vs litter size, 16 Dec 2025
bec = because msats = microsats Imm = immigrant wt = weight = body mass
OR = Original Resident = UPD with no eartag in first year of research in 1995
This file contains information on some additional variables that I do not use for Fig 10.7 (e.g., Maxcop, Mincop, 1st of 2 cops)
Partur = parturition
File name = Fig 10.7, Bottom, UPDs, clan type vs litter size, 16 Dec 202
Replication data for: Fig 5.6, Visual and vocal conspicuousness, BTPDs vs WTPDs, 17 Oct 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: black-tails vs white-tails, territorial calls per hour, visible prairie dogs
File name = Fig 5.6, Visual and vocal conspicuousness, black-tails vs white-tails, 17 Oct 2025
Numbers in this file are means + standard error (SEM)
Numbers above each SEM line indicate number of counts and number of wards examined
over several days after first emergences of juveniles from their natal burrow entrances
Counts include information from both adults and yearlings of both species.
Sometimes I made >1 count from the same ward on the same day. If so, then counts
were always separated by >=15 minutes
I assumed counts from the same ward on the same or different days were independent.
More details of methods for both counts are in Hoogland 1977, 1979a (superscripts 1281 and 128
Replication data for: Fig 7.2, Focal and scan samples for individual GPDs, Date = 05 Nov 2025 Re
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Gunnison's prairie dogs, focal samples for male-32 and female-BS
Filename = Fig 7.2, Focal and scan samples for individual GPDs, Date = 05 Nov 2025
These data come directly from Ian Hirschler, probably in early May 2015
FPA = Information from single FOCAL sample per day
IPA =mean of several instantaneous SCAN samples on single day, with one IPA per day.
Dog = GPD marker in 2014
Date = Date of FPA or IPA
I have not altered these data from Ian Hirschler in any way.
I used these data for GPD-male 32 in Fig 7.2 (N = 32 focal samples) and for GPD-female BS in Fig 7.2 of Hoogland 2026 (N = 21 focal samples)
I also used these data for GPD-male 03 in Fig 7.2 (N = 31 days of scan samples) and for GPD-female RSBB in Fig 7.2 of Hoogland 2026 (N = 29 days of scan samples)
Note that the data in this file is for overall mean PROPORTIONS. To convert to overall mean PERCENTAGES
for Figs 7.1 and 7.2, I multiple proportions by 100.
Ian checked all these data TWO TIMES before publication of Hirschler et al. 2016, for which the citation is
Hirschler, I. M., J. L. Gedert, J. Major, T. Townsend, J. L. Hoogland. 2016. What is the best way to estimate vigilance?
What is the best way to estimate vigilance? A comparison of two methods for Gunnison’s
prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni). Animal Behaviour 121: 117-122.
Filename = Fig 7.2, Focal and scan samples for individual GPDs, Date = 05 Nov 2025
Note that the data in this file are PROPORTIONS. To convert proportions to PERCENTAGES
for Figs 7.1 and 7.2, I multiplied proportions by 100
Replication data for: Fig 8.14, Bottom, Submergers vs nonsubmergers, GPDs, 21 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: alarm calls, submergers vs nonsubmergers, GPDs
Filename = Fig 8.14, Bottom, Submergers vs nonsubmergers, GPDs, 21 Nov 2025
OLD file name = GPDs, Submerge, 23 Sept 2019
These numbers checked TWO TIMES at creation of old file name
194/1290 of GPD submergers = 15.04% DID give alarm call in response to experimental badger
1096/1290 of GPD submergers = 84.96% did NOT give alarm call in response to experimental badger
947/2872 of GPD NON-submergers = 32.97% DID give alarm call in response to experimental badgers
1925/2872 of GPD NON-submergers = 67.03% DID NOT give alarm call in response to experimental badgers
Data in this file represents SUMMATION OF GPD DATA FROM ALL YEARS
Variable = Frequency = number of observations of calling or non-calling for
GPDs that did and did not submerge during experiments with the moving stuffed badger
Submerger = 1 = prairie dog DID submerge
Submerger = 2 = prairie dog did NOT submerge
Alarm call = 1 = prairie dog DID give alarm call
Alarm call = 2 = prairie dog did NOT give alarm call
For statistical analysis, I did a 2x2 chi-square test
These data used for Fig 8.14, Bottom, in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 03 June 2025.
I considered data from the same prairie dog in different years to be independent.
Counts for this file come from study of alarm call raw data sheets.
Filename = Fig 8.14, Bottom, Submergers vs nonsubmergers, GPDs, 21 Nov 2025
I considered data from the same prairie dog
on the same day and on different days and in different years to be independent
Seine: Le quai de l'Archevêché à Paris, carte de Devilliers (1811)
No full textPlan du quai de l'Archevêché, actuelle île de la Cité.
Carte de B. L. Devilliers (1811).
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Seine_Quai_De_L_Archeveche_Devilliers_1811.tiff
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/51.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p